<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Truth Hurts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mahablog.com/2006/01/11/truth-hurts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/01/11/truth-hurts/</link>
	<description>Making the World Safe for Liberalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:48:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/01/11/truth-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-1991</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=311#comment-1991</guid>
		<description>does alito like eggplant?

The good Senator Graham from South Carolina jerks tears from Sammy &quot;The Sphincter&quot; Alito&#039;s chattel wife by apologizing for having to answer tough questions from Democrats.  So, is he a closet bigot?  His family knows.  I&#039;d lay 8-5 that over the course of their lives, his collective family has uttered &quot;moolie&quot; more than the GOP would like to know.  But, what the heck, he was otherwise raised well, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does alito like eggplant?</p>
<p>The good Senator Graham from South Carolina jerks tears from Sammy &#8220;The Sphincter&#8221; Alito&#8217;s chattel wife by apologizing for having to answer tough questions from Democrats.  So, is he a closet bigot?  His family knows.  I&#8217;d lay 8-5 that over the course of their lives, his collective family has uttered &#8220;moolie&#8221; more than the GOP would like to know.  But, what the heck, he was otherwise raised well, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alyosha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/01/11/truth-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-1990</link>
		<dc:creator>alyosha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=311#comment-1990</guid>
		<description>Freedom and restrictions thereof mean different things to righties and lefties, because righties and lefties have different views, visions actually, of morality.

Righties are obsessed with private morality, lefties with public morality. Righties care about that fetus you&#039;re carrying or who you sleep with. They could care less that we&#039;re bombing the bejesus out of some third world country, or that polar bears are dying because of global warming. You&#039;re completely free to pillage the rest of the world, but you better behave at home.

Lefties care about what we&#039;re doing on the other side of the globe, because we know it comes back to us eventually - we intrinsically understand that there is a law of karma at work. Lefties could care less about who you&#039;re sleeping with.

This is why righties can&#039;t stand socialism, they see it as restricting their freedom to operate as they will in the public domain, in one breath, and in the private it&#039;s, shudder, Godless - you can do anything you want at home. Too much freedom for them, in the private sphere.

The righties idea of morality is tribal and fear based, looking up to the alpha male for protection - our God, our Father will take care of us, if we behave. And to hell with those who aren&#039;t part of our tribe. And they project this out onto everyone, they think everyone else is out to take what they have, which they use to justify their own acts of aggression. It&#039;s all based on fear.

The lefties idea of morality is modern and rational, it attempts to understand the whole world as a system, that what we do over here eventually feeds back to us here. Not everyone in the world operates this way - there really are people who want to take what we have - but it&#039;s the only hope for a humane and peaceable world. It&#039;s based on love.

Fear constrains vision, love opens it. It comes down to what Einstein called the only important question, whether the universe is friendly or not. Righties believe it isn&#039;t, lefties believe it is.

The right believes in the power of the strong alpha male - this is what Alito&#039;s views are all about. By contrast, the left believes in the power of We the People, which was a radical idea in the 1700s, too radical for the regressive right of today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freedom and restrictions thereof mean different things to righties and lefties, because righties and lefties have different views, visions actually, of morality.</p>
<p>Righties are obsessed with private morality, lefties with public morality. Righties care about that fetus you&#8217;re carrying or who you sleep with. They could care less that we&#8217;re bombing the bejesus out of some third world country, or that polar bears are dying because of global warming. You&#8217;re completely free to pillage the rest of the world, but you better behave at home.</p>
<p>Lefties care about what we&#8217;re doing on the other side of the globe, because we know it comes back to us eventually &#8211; we intrinsically understand that there is a law of karma at work. Lefties could care less about who you&#8217;re sleeping with.</p>
<p>This is why righties can&#8217;t stand socialism, they see it as restricting their freedom to operate as they will in the public domain, in one breath, and in the private it&#8217;s, shudder, Godless &#8211; you can do anything you want at home. Too much freedom for them, in the private sphere.</p>
<p>The righties idea of morality is tribal and fear based, looking up to the alpha male for protection &#8211; our God, our Father will take care of us, if we behave. And to hell with those who aren&#8217;t part of our tribe. And they project this out onto everyone, they think everyone else is out to take what they have, which they use to justify their own acts of aggression. It&#8217;s all based on fear.</p>
<p>The lefties idea of morality is modern and rational, it attempts to understand the whole world as a system, that what we do over here eventually feeds back to us here. Not everyone in the world operates this way &#8211; there really are people who want to take what we have &#8211; but it&#8217;s the only hope for a humane and peaceable world. It&#8217;s based on love.</p>
<p>Fear constrains vision, love opens it. It comes down to what Einstein called the only important question, whether the universe is friendly or not. Righties believe it isn&#8217;t, lefties believe it is.</p>
<p>The right believes in the power of the strong alpha male &#8211; this is what Alito&#8217;s views are all about. By contrast, the left believes in the power of We the People, which was a radical idea in the 1700s, too radical for the regressive right of today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justme</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/01/11/truth-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-1981</link>
		<dc:creator>justme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=311#comment-1981</guid>
		<description>Here lies the US constitution , born Sept , 17th  1787, died  Jan, 11,2006  ,,may she rest in peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here lies the US constitution , born Sept , 17th  1787, died  Jan, 11,2006  ,,may she rest in peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justme</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/01/11/truth-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-1980</link>
		<dc:creator>justme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=311#comment-1980</guid>
		<description>I believe , maha, you are 100% correct about scalito. Every point you made has been right on the money, and if one tried one could pick many more points against him that would also be valid, but let me ask you this: Lets say for a second the senate agreed with us and refused to confirm alito,,then what?DO you think bush will nominate anyone better?Maybe worse? Are we really expecting any justice from anyone bush puts forward?

 I want the good guys to win here as badly as anyone but to what end?Lets face it, the republican senate would rubber stamp the grand wizard of the kkk if bush nominated &quot;it&quot; and rather then ask the grand wizzard questions they would spend their time defending the noimation.And bloggers like captain ed would trip overthemselves to say the nominee was wonderful.

 There is not going to be any justice here, whether this jack ass is installed or not, because if this one doesn&#039;t make it, Bush has a potentially WORSE one to put in his place, maybe he would nominate brownie next ,, he does a heck of a job , you know. 

 I think we should turn off the life support on our rights and freedoms , because they are dead.All we can do now is move forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe , maha, you are 100% correct about scalito. Every point you made has been right on the money, and if one tried one could pick many more points against him that would also be valid, but let me ask you this: Lets say for a second the senate agreed with us and refused to confirm alito,,then what?DO you think bush will nominate anyone better?Maybe worse? Are we really expecting any justice from anyone bush puts forward?</p>
<p> I want the good guys to win here as badly as anyone but to what end?Lets face it, the republican senate would rubber stamp the grand wizard of the kkk if bush nominated &#8220;it&#8221; and rather then ask the grand wizzard questions they would spend their time defending the noimation.And bloggers like captain ed would trip overthemselves to say the nominee was wonderful.</p>
<p> There is not going to be any justice here, whether this jack ass is installed or not, because if this one doesn&#8217;t make it, Bush has a potentially WORSE one to put in his place, maybe he would nominate brownie next ,, he does a heck of a job , you know. </p>
<p> I think we should turn off the life support on our rights and freedoms , because they are dead.All we can do now is move forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/01/11/truth-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-1979</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=311#comment-1979</guid>
		<description>The righty bloggers are full of nonsense; Schumer clearly won, because Alito was evasive and just plain didn&#039;t answer two interrelated questions (whether the Constitution provides a right to choose and whether it&#039;s okay to overturn precedent, particularly since Alito&#039;s record indicates he&#039;s not afraid to do so) but, by contrast, Alito freely answered in plain terms the easy question. The only conclusion is that Alito doesn&#039;t want us to know what his opinion on abortion is. Why else would he hedge like that? I don&#039;t see how this is a victory for Alito, it just makes him look cagey. And I think that would be equally true if Schumer was asking his opinion on what color the sky is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The righty bloggers are full of nonsense; Schumer clearly won, because Alito was evasive and just plain didn&#8217;t answer two interrelated questions (whether the Constitution provides a right to choose and whether it&#8217;s okay to overturn precedent, particularly since Alito&#8217;s record indicates he&#8217;s not afraid to do so) but, by contrast, Alito freely answered in plain terms the easy question. The only conclusion is that Alito doesn&#8217;t want us to know what his opinion on abortion is. Why else would he hedge like that? I don&#8217;t see how this is a victory for Alito, it just makes him look cagey. And I think that would be equally true if Schumer was asking his opinion on what color the sky is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/01/11/truth-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-1977</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=311#comment-1977</guid>
		<description>All good minded folk don&#039;t worry about consequences when they beleive rules and restrictions do not apply to them. They have not been touched, as you mention, by the misuse of power or the misguided good efforts of folks that feel they have the best of intentions at heart....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All good minded folk don&#8217;t worry about consequences when they beleive rules and restrictions do not apply to them. They have not been touched, as you mention, by the misuse of power or the misguided good efforts of folks that feel they have the best of intentions at heart&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
