<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh, Wait &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/03/oh-wait/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/03/oh-wait/</link>
	<description>Making the World Safe for Liberalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:14:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry Ott</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/03/oh-wait/comment-page-1/#comment-6050</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Ott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 04:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=573#comment-6050</guid>
		<description>RadioClash:  not quite &quot;on the verge&quot; for the vast majority, and absent oil-for-food money not all that 1st Worldly for even the minority of Iraqis living on the good side of Hussein. 

verge = &quot;The point beyond which an action, state, or condition is likely to begin or occur; the brink&quot; (of being a first world country?)  Perhaps we have a different take on First Worldness. 

Maybe you meant &quot;purge&quot; instead of &quot;verge&quot;;  as in, &quot;one good purge away&quot;.

Not that it&#039;s all tinsel and glitter now, but &quot;on the verge&quot; is a little &quot;over the top&quot;, don&#039;t you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RadioClash:  not quite &#8220;on the verge&#8221; for the vast majority, and absent oil-for-food money not all that 1st Worldly for even the minority of Iraqis living on the good side of Hussein. </p>
<p>verge = &#8220;The point beyond which an action, state, or condition is likely to begin or occur; the brink&#8221; (of being a first world country?)  Perhaps we have a different take on First Worldness. </p>
<p>Maybe you meant &#8220;purge&#8221; instead of &#8220;verge&#8221;;  as in, &#8220;one good purge away&#8221;.</p>
<p>Not that it&#8217;s all tinsel and glitter now, but &#8220;on the verge&#8221; is a little &#8220;over the top&#8221;, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RadioClash</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/03/oh-wait/comment-page-1/#comment-6047</link>
		<dc:creator>RadioClash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 02:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=573#comment-6047</guid>
		<description>Dennis Byrne writes:

&quot;Why is it called “rebuilding” Iraq, when it was a sorry state before the war? Shouldn’t we be talking about “building” Iraq?&quot;

You gotta be kidding me.  Iraq was on the verge of becoming a first world country, and then the US put the screws to them in 1991 and haven&#039;t let up since. Yes, they are now a &#039;sorry state&#039;, and yes we SHOULD call it &quot;rebuilding&quot;.    Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis Byrne writes:</p>
<p>&#8220;Why is it called “rebuilding” Iraq, when it was a sorry state before the war? Shouldn’t we be talking about “building” Iraq?&#8221;</p>
<p>You gotta be kidding me.  Iraq was on the verge of becoming a first world country, and then the US put the screws to them in 1991 and haven&#8217;t let up since. Yes, they are now a &#8217;sorry state&#8217;, and yes we SHOULD call it &#8220;rebuilding&#8221;.    Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swami</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/03/oh-wait/comment-page-1/#comment-6034</link>
		<dc:creator>Swami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 21:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=573#comment-6034</guid>
		<description>http://daily.greencine.com/archives/mission-accomplished.jpg

Remember the pottery barn rule?

Now Condi is laying the responsibility for Bush&#039;s failed adventure on the Iraqi&#039;s. Why don&#039;t they petition God for an answer about how to resolve the Iraqi fiasco.. after all, he was the one who told Bush to take out Saddam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://daily.greencine.com/archives/mission-accomplished.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://daily.greencine.com/archives/mission-accomplished.jpg</a></p>
<p>Remember the pottery barn rule?</p>
<p>Now Condi is laying the responsibility for Bush&#8217;s failed adventure on the Iraqi&#8217;s. Why don&#8217;t they petition God for an answer about how to resolve the Iraqi fiasco.. after all, he was the one who told Bush to take out Saddam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/03/oh-wait/comment-page-1/#comment-6027</link>
		<dc:creator>maha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 20:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=573#comment-6027</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I might be a terrorist.&lt;/i&gt;

Don&#039;t blame me. I tried to raise you right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I might be a terrorist.</i></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t blame me. I tried to raise you right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/03/oh-wait/comment-page-1/#comment-6024</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=573#comment-6024</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that if you&#039;re paying attention, the whole &quot;no good news from Iraq&quot; makes sense. You don&#039;t even have to work that hard; recently, the NBC nightly news had a segment where they did sort of a behind-the-scenes look at what it&#039;s like to be a reporter in Iraq with their correspondant who&#039;s been there since the war started. It started, &quot;You want to know why we do stories from hotel balconies and not on the streets?&quot; followed by footage of the reporters and camera crews &lt;i&gt;getting shot at&lt;/i&gt;. Reporters have to wear flak jackets and be escorted by armed guards if they even want to go outside. But things are peachy keen in Baghdad.

Off topic: If we&#039;re talking about security, a story hit the New York papers this morning saying that the powers that be don&#039;t think they&#039;ll be able to get the improved first-responder communication system -- something that firefighters and policemen have been clamoring for since 9/11 -- up and running until 2009. I don&#039;t understand security in New York. Ineffectual bag searches on the subway -- individuals can refuse to be searched and then re-enter the subway via another entrance -- are sucking up money and resources, but we can&#039;t get the first-responder communication system up until &lt;i&gt;8 years&lt;/i&gt; after 9/11?  This strikes me as symptomatic of our whole approach to &quot;homeland&quot; security -- the approach is backwards, perhaps aimed more at PR than actually making us safe. 

Also, I like falafel. I guess this means I might be a terrorist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that if you&#8217;re paying attention, the whole &#8220;no good news from Iraq&#8221; makes sense. You don&#8217;t even have to work that hard; recently, the NBC nightly news had a segment where they did sort of a behind-the-scenes look at what it&#8217;s like to be a reporter in Iraq with their correspondant who&#8217;s been there since the war started. It started, &#8220;You want to know why we do stories from hotel balconies and not on the streets?&#8221; followed by footage of the reporters and camera crews <i>getting shot at</i>. Reporters have to wear flak jackets and be escorted by armed guards if they even want to go outside. But things are peachy keen in Baghdad.</p>
<p>Off topic: If we&#8217;re talking about security, a story hit the New York papers this morning saying that the powers that be don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll be able to get the improved first-responder communication system &#8212; something that firefighters and policemen have been clamoring for since 9/11 &#8212; up and running until 2009. I don&#8217;t understand security in New York. Ineffectual bag searches on the subway &#8212; individuals can refuse to be searched and then re-enter the subway via another entrance &#8212; are sucking up money and resources, but we can&#8217;t get the first-responder communication system up until <i>8 years</i> after 9/11?  This strikes me as symptomatic of our whole approach to &#8220;homeland&#8221; security &#8212; the approach is backwards, perhaps aimed more at PR than actually making us safe. </p>
<p>Also, I like falafel. I guess this means I might be a terrorist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NorthOf49</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/03/oh-wait/comment-page-1/#comment-6019</link>
		<dc:creator>NorthOf49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 16:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=573#comment-6019</guid>
		<description>Again with the message &quot;thing&quot;?  Some people seem more concerned about image than substance these days (hey look, I made a straw man. I wonder where I picked that up?)  Well, if things aren&#039;t as bad as they appear, then all the bad press in the world won&#039;t make a difference.  Life in Iraq will improve for Iraqi&#039;s, and I&#039;m sure they will be thankful for that.  The Kurds seem to be happy with US efforts, but then, they&#039;ve been insulated from Saddam for more then 10-years now.  10.... years...

However, if the claim of &quot;negative press&quot; is just an effort to counter the potential damage it might have on re-election efforts in the US this year, then sadly that&#039;s how shallow appearences can be.  

Bottom line: It&#039;s time to get real. Forget the Nielsen&#039;s ratings, this is not a TV show. If things are as bad in Iraq as they say they are (and all signs points to yes), you might reap what you sow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again with the message &#8220;thing&#8221;?  Some people seem more concerned about image than substance these days (hey look, I made a straw man. I wonder where I picked that up?)  Well, if things aren&#8217;t as bad as they appear, then all the bad press in the world won&#8217;t make a difference.  Life in Iraq will improve for Iraqi&#8217;s, and I&#8217;m sure they will be thankful for that.  The Kurds seem to be happy with US efforts, but then, they&#8217;ve been insulated from Saddam for more then 10-years now.  10&#8230;. years&#8230;</p>
<p>However, if the claim of &#8220;negative press&#8221; is just an effort to counter the potential damage it might have on re-election efforts in the US this year, then sadly that&#8217;s how shallow appearences can be.  </p>
<p>Bottom line: It&#8217;s time to get real. Forget the Nielsen&#8217;s ratings, this is not a TV show. If things are as bad in Iraq as they say they are (and all signs points to yes), you might reap what you sow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raenelle</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/03/oh-wait/comment-page-1/#comment-6017</link>
		<dc:creator>Raenelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 15:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=573#comment-6017</guid>
		<description>It has to be a sign of some defect (immaturity? narcissism?) that this administration judges the world by their actions but insists that they themselves be judged for their motives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has to be a sign of some defect (immaturity? narcissism?) that this administration judges the world by their actions but insists that they themselves be judged for their motives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
