<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Amendment Confusion</title>
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/</link>
	<description>Exposing the ugly truths about the Bush Administration.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: erinyes</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6846</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6846</guid>
					<description>My elementary school principal,Sister Mary Perpetua, would never have allowed such behavior. Even though I'm quite sure she was against abortion, I'm also quite sure she would never have allowed a student to wear an anti abortion tee shirt to class. We wore uniforms, and were in school to learn, not practice politics.
How things have changed...
Debate has gone from thoughtful discussion to who can shout the loudest, and religion has turned from the prince of peace to the old Testament God of wrath.
Our president has said&quot;When I talk about war, I'm really talkin' 'bout peace&quot;.
We're on the verge of a global energy crisis, and our highways are clogged with fuel guzzling , single passenger vehicles.
America has lost its' mind</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My elementary school principal,Sister Mary Perpetua, would never have allowed such behavior. Even though I&#8217;m quite sure she was against abortion, I&#8217;m also quite sure she would never have allowed a student to wear an anti abortion tee shirt to class. We wore uniforms, and were in school to learn, not practice politics.<br />
How things have changed&#8230;<br />
Debate has gone from thoughtful discussion to who can shout the loudest, and religion has turned from the prince of peace to the old Testament God of wrath.<br />
Our president has said&#8221;When I talk about war, I&#8217;m really talkin&#8217; &#8217;bout peace&#8221;.<br />
We&#8217;re on the verge of a global energy crisis, and our highways are clogged with fuel guzzling , single passenger vehicles.<br />
America has lost its&#8217; mind
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Zeus</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6843</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 05:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6843</guid>
					<description>Most schools publish a student manual at the beginning of each school year addressing this topic (the dress code that is). I think everyone would agree that is the duty of the school to provide an environment conducive to learning.  An intimidating message such as the one worn on by this student appears to violate this premise.  Therefore, I believe the the principal was not only within his rights to ask this student to remove the shirt, it was his duty.  

In other words kid, take the freakin shirt off.  I'm the principal and you're the student.  You don't like it, you're suspended. And guess what? - when you grow up and get a job, you're boss is going to tell you what you can and cannot wear too as well as other rules you might not want to follow.

I happen to be a strong liberal - freedom of speech and all that - but c'mon.  If Mr. Harper felt so strongly about the gay rights event, maybe he should have formed his own alliance and staged an event with the opposing message.  If the school did not allow such an event, maybe that would have been the time to file his first amendment lawsuit.  He might have had a better chance of winning.  Too bad his parents didn't give him this advice - but then again - they're probably the ones that taught him his intolerance of others.

I admire the administrators at this school and wish that they had been in charge at my daughter's school in the days after Columbine.  A forum was held to address the concerns of the parents and students. I attended because my daughter had expressed nervousness about a group of students who wore trenchcoats to school every day (and continued to after the tragedy). I asked the superintendant if it was wise to allow this to continue.  I kind of figured that maybe he would take the kids' concerns into consideration since the purpose of the forum was to take the kids' concerns into consideration.  His reply - he couldn't violate their rights and their freedom to express themselves.  I suggested that maybe my daughter could wear her bikini to school.  Reply - that would be a distraction.  Go figure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Most schools publish a student manual at the beginning of each school year addressing this topic (the dress code that is). I think everyone would agree that is the duty of the school to provide an environment conducive to learning.  An intimidating message such as the one worn on by this student appears to violate this premise.  Therefore, I believe the the principal was not only within his rights to ask this student to remove the shirt, it was his duty.  </p>
	<p>In other words kid, take the freakin shirt off.  I&#8217;m the principal and you&#8217;re the student.  You don&#8217;t like it, you&#8217;re suspended. And guess what? - when you grow up and get a job, you&#8217;re boss is going to tell you what you can and cannot wear too as well as other rules you might not want to follow.</p>
	<p>I happen to be a strong liberal - freedom of speech and all that - but c&#8217;mon.  If Mr. Harper felt so strongly about the gay rights event, maybe he should have formed his own alliance and staged an event with the opposing message.  If the school did not allow such an event, maybe that would have been the time to file his first amendment lawsuit.  He might have had a better chance of winning.  Too bad his parents didn&#8217;t give him this advice - but then again - they&#8217;re probably the ones that taught him his intolerance of others.</p>
	<p>I admire the administrators at this school and wish that they had been in charge at my daughter&#8217;s school in the days after Columbine.  A forum was held to address the concerns of the parents and students. I attended because my daughter had expressed nervousness about a group of students who wore trenchcoats to school every day (and continued to after the tragedy). I asked the superintendant if it was wise to allow this to continue.  I kind of figured that maybe he would take the kids&#8217; concerns into consideration since the purpose of the forum was to take the kids&#8217; concerns into consideration.  His reply - he couldn&#8217;t violate their rights and their freedom to express themselves.  I suggested that maybe my daughter could wear her bikini to school.  Reply - that would be a distraction.  Go figure!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Swami</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6838</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6838</guid>
					<description>Homophobia is an intregral part of the Christian faith. We might condemn Fred Phelps for being a little over the top in his zeal to carry the Christian message forward,but every utterance he makes against homosexuallity is supported in scripture and is considered the infallable word of God. Both the New Testament and Old Testament are littered with references of homsexuality being an abomination to God. Rather than blaming to the messenger for being homophobic maybe we should examine the source of the message. The apostle Paul describes homosexuality as,&quot; that which is unseemly&quot;, which is true if viewed only as a physical expression geared toward procreation,but without knowledge or understanding it is also unseemly that the earth is round and not flat.

Here's a lovely statement written by Col.Robert G. Ingersoll ( the great agnostic)—,&lt;b&gt;.&quot; the church has been a skeleton at the banquet of life&quot;&lt;/b&gt;....Isn't that neet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Homophobia is an intregral part of the Christian faith. We might condemn Fred Phelps for being a little over the top in his zeal to carry the Christian message forward,but every utterance he makes against homosexuallity is supported in scripture and is considered the infallable word of God. Both the New Testament and Old Testament are littered with references of homsexuality being an abomination to God. Rather than blaming to the messenger for being homophobic maybe we should examine the source of the message. The apostle Paul describes homosexuality as,&#8221; that which is unseemly&#8221;, which is true if viewed only as a physical expression geared toward procreation,but without knowledge or understanding it is also unseemly that the earth is round and not flat.</p>
	<p>Here&#8217;s a lovely statement written by Col.Robert G. Ingersoll ( the great agnostic)—,<b>.&#8221; the church has been a skeleton at the banquet of life&#8221;</b>&#8230;.Isn&#8217;t that neet?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6834</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 00:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6834</guid>
					<description>Lauren - 
I think this post might be discussing two topics because Maha began it with the very thing you mentioned.  
Did you happen to catch my Comment #3 here, where I had the link about who this young man might be?
Also, the two links in Comment #7 give more background as well.

Unless I've been posting to the wrong one, too???  Nobody has commented on them, so I wonder...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Lauren -<br />
I think this post might be discussing two topics because Maha began it with the very thing you mentioned.<br />
Did you happen to catch my Comment #3 here, where I had the link about who this young man might be?<br />
Also, the two links in Comment #7 give more background as well.</p>
	<p>Unless I&#8217;ve been posting to the wrong one, too???  Nobody has commented on them, so I wonder&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: joanr16</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6832</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 00:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6832</guid>
					<description>I can't imagine the circumstances where it would be permissible to wear a racist T-shirt in a public school.  

I agree that a lot of people still see homophobia as &quot;ambiguous,&quot; when they see racism as absolutely wrong.  I got the impression the 9th Circuit decision refused to accept any ambiguity on the matter.  No racist T-shirts, no anti-gay T-shirts.

When the kids get to college, though, all bets are off.  Frats are notorious for creating T-shirts with images and slogans that are insulting to women, African Americans, gays, computer science majors, Democrats, you name it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I can&#8217;t imagine the circumstances where it would be permissible to wear a racist T-shirt in a public school.  </p>
	<p>I agree that a lot of people still see homophobia as &#8220;ambiguous,&#8221; when they see racism as absolutely wrong.  I got the impression the 9th Circuit decision refused to accept any ambiguity on the matter.  No racist T-shirts, no anti-gay T-shirts.</p>
	<p>When the kids get to college, though, all bets are off.  Frats are notorious for creating T-shirts with images and slogans that are insulting to women, African Americans, gays, computer science majors, Democrats, you name it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6831</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6831</guid>
					<description>Shit.  I totally made this comment on the wrong post.

So sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Shit.  I totally made this comment on the wrong post.</p>
	<p>So sorry.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6830</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6830</guid>
					<description>Maha, this happened in my hometown.  My hometown paper, jconline.com, has the articles written about the incident, but not the accompanying picture in yesterday's paper with some of the text in the email.  It called for &quot;killing and raping&quot; the &quot;Republican Ayatollahs&quot; and specifically named Bush to be killed and Laura Bush to be raped and killed, among the raping and killing of other so-called Republican ayatollahs, all in caps lock.  I was skeptical at first, but understood why it is the authorities were alerted to the message.  It parrots terrorist language too convincingly for comfort.

That said, who knows how serious he was or whether or not he was on a crazy rant like everyone's been known to go on.  I've been quoted many a time that if certain things would go on in this country, I'd take one for the team and head to the White House myself with a sawed off shotgun.  Then again, it's pretty obvious I am joking and/or totally not going to shoot the president, much less anyone else.  With Buddhi, after seeing the message, it just wasn't that obvious.

I'll keep looking to see if I can reproduce the image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maha, this happened in my hometown.  My hometown paper, jconline.com, has the articles written about the incident, but not the accompanying picture in yesterday&#8217;s paper with some of the text in the email.  It called for &#8220;killing and raping&#8221; the &#8220;Republican Ayatollahs&#8221; and specifically named Bush to be killed and Laura Bush to be raped and killed, among the raping and killing of other so-called Republican ayatollahs, all in caps lock.  I was skeptical at first, but understood why it is the authorities were alerted to the message.  It parrots terrorist language too convincingly for comfort.</p>
	<p>That said, who knows how serious he was or whether or not he was on a crazy rant like everyone&#8217;s been known to go on.  I&#8217;ve been quoted many a time that if certain things would go on in this country, I&#8217;d take one for the team and head to the White House myself with a sawed off shotgun.  Then again, it&#8217;s pretty obvious I am joking and/or totally not going to shoot the president, much less anyone else.  With Buddhi, after seeing the message, it just wasn&#8217;t that obvious.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;ll keep looking to see if I can reproduce the image.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6829</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6829</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Take this all one step further…would it be ok for “grown ups” to wear this shirt in their workplace?&lt;/i&gt;

Not anywhere I've ever worked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Take this all one step further…would it be ok for “grown ups” to wear this shirt in their workplace?</i></p>
	<p>Not anywhere I&#8217;ve ever worked.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: justme</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6824</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6824</guid>
					<description>Remember when kids went to school to LEARN ?.....

 I think Erin took the wind out of my sails somewhat by asking the question which I planned to ask....What if we , just for the sake of this discussion , replace the words on Tyler's shirt with words of racism instead of just plain homophobia?Then would it be ok?

In my  high school(after private school with the &quot;no pants rule,grrrrr), as I recall, we were not allowed to wear any shirts with words printed on them except for school logo.I couldn't wear a Led zepplin tee shirt , so I was not pleased by it..in my day no one wanted to wear shirts that were about hate, how sad we have reached that day now...at a time when we claim we are such a &quot;christian society&quot;....how educational this situation is indeed.

 This brings up the story of fred phelps &quot;church&quot; from kansas.This error in breeding sends his group to the funerals of our local troops to stand outside with signs that say&quot;God hates fags&quot; ... their claim, as they shout at the parents and wives of our dead troops trying to bury their loved one, is that they are dead because God is punishing America for &quot;tolerating&quot; homosexuals...

 These people claim a first amendment right to stand outside of funerals of our troops and yell terrible things at the greiving families, like:&quot; You deserved to have your son killed , it's your fault for tolerating homosexuals in America !&quot; ...last week one accused the mother of a dead troop of &quot;flipping off God&quot; and &quot;having the nerve to cry about it when God punished her family&quot;.......
  Gov.Vilsak, a dem, who was in Iraq, was forced to sign a bill make it illegal to protest at funerals...Still they came,, they were met by the &quot;patriot riders&quot; a ever growing group a big burly biker dudes, who stand in front of the protestors and shield them from the families view(who also could have been arrested IMHO under the bill vilsak signed)....
 Phelps group was on the 5 oclock news, saying they planned to challenge the bill in court, they stood down the street from the funeral holding their &quot;God hates fags&quot; sign Swearing Bush's court would deliver them....

  I was told by a judge, as a minor I didn't have rights.I couldn't petition the court without an adult..I wonder if these kids are not being used as pawns in their parents &quot;culture war&quot;...

And one more thing..aren't parents suppose to be raising kids who learn to fit in to society?There are going to be all kinds of different people these kids encounter in adulthood and some they just won't ever like,and they have to learn to live in this world beside them..they are not bush, regime change is not an option..how are they learning to get along in the world ?

 Take this all one step further...would it be ok for &quot;grown ups&quot; to wear this shirt in their workplace?My shirt would still be boring by todays standard,,, all I hate is liver and peas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Remember when kids went to school to LEARN ?&#8230;..</p>
	<p> I think Erin took the wind out of my sails somewhat by asking the question which I planned to ask&#8230;.What if we , just for the sake of this discussion , replace the words on Tyler&#8217;s shirt with words of racism instead of just plain homophobia?Then would it be ok?</p>
	<p>In my  high school(after private school with the &#8220;no pants rule,grrrrr), as I recall, we were not allowed to wear any shirts with words printed on them except for school logo.I couldn&#8217;t wear a Led zepplin tee shirt , so I was not pleased by it..in my day no one wanted to wear shirts that were about hate, how sad we have reached that day now&#8230;at a time when we claim we are such a &#8220;christian society&#8221;&#8230;.how educational this situation is indeed.</p>
	<p> This brings up the story of fred phelps &#8220;church&#8221; from kansas.This error in breeding sends his group to the funerals of our local troops to stand outside with signs that say&#8221;God hates fags&#8221; &#8230; their claim, as they shout at the parents and wives of our dead troops trying to bury their loved one, is that they are dead because God is punishing America for &#8220;tolerating&#8221; homosexuals&#8230;</p>
	<p> These people claim a first amendment right to stand outside of funerals of our troops and yell terrible things at the greiving families, like:&#8221; You deserved to have your son killed , it&#8217;s your fault for tolerating homosexuals in America !&#8221; &#8230;last week one accused the mother of a dead troop of &#8220;flipping off God&#8221; and &#8220;having the nerve to cry about it when God punished her family&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
  Gov.Vilsak, a dem, who was in Iraq, was forced to sign a bill make it illegal to protest at funerals&#8230;Still they came,, they were met by the &#8220;patriot riders&#8221; a ever growing group a big burly biker dudes, who stand in front of the protestors and shield them from the families view(who also could have been arrested IMHO under the bill vilsak signed)&#8230;.<br />
 Phelps group was on the 5 oclock news, saying they planned to challenge the bill in court, they stood down the street from the funeral holding their &#8220;God hates fags&#8221; sign Swearing Bush&#8217;s court would deliver them&#8230;.</p>
	<p>  I was told by a judge, as a minor I didn&#8217;t have rights.I couldn&#8217;t petition the court without an adult..I wonder if these kids are not being used as pawns in their parents &#8220;culture war&#8221;&#8230;</p>
	<p>And one more thing..aren&#8217;t parents suppose to be raising kids who learn to fit in to society?There are going to be all kinds of different people these kids encounter in adulthood and some they just won&#8217;t ever like,and they have to learn to live in this world beside them..they are not bush, regime change is not an option..how are they learning to get along in the world ?</p>
	<p> Take this all one step further&#8230;would it be ok for &#8220;grown ups&#8221; to wear this shirt in their workplace?My shirt would still be boring by todays standard,,, all I hate is liver and peas.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6823</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/04/21/first-amendment-confusion/#comment-6823</guid>
					<description>I think the legal ruling is sound if based on school authorities rights to maintain discipline, but it surely is a troubling area. Ideally, of course, the kid would simply be ridiculed and ostracized for wearing such a t-shirt and one would hope that the same would apply at the college level. At the same time the Nazis get to march in Skokie and I personally have a problem with the idea of &quot;hate crimes&quot;. Don't get me wrong, I think anyone who threatens or assaults another human being is guilty of a crime and should be punished, but to enhance the crime because the motivation for the threat or assault or whatever, was the person's skin color, sexual orientation, religious beliefs or some other category seems like a &quot;thought&quot; crime to me. If I slug a guy because I hate the fact that my wife thinks he's sexy, I get the time for assault and thats it. If I slug the guy because he is gay, I do the same time plus an enhancer. That is a little like going to jail because I think about a world without Dumbya as president. I guess where I am going with this is that the non liberal blogger was not really in left field in my opinion. I think he or she was wrong and the 9th Circuit was right, but I might well have come down differently a long, long time ago when my high school banned &quot;Stop the War&quot; t-shirts which certainly had the potential to incite disturbances--that is why we wanted to wear them. At the time I certainly thought my constituional rights were being infringed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think the legal ruling is sound if based on school authorities rights to maintain discipline, but it surely is a troubling area. Ideally, of course, the kid would simply be ridiculed and ostracized for wearing such a t-shirt and one would hope that the same would apply at the college level. At the same time the Nazis get to march in Skokie and I personally have a problem with the idea of &#8220;hate crimes&#8221;. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I think anyone who threatens or assaults another human being is guilty of a crime and should be punished, but to enhance the crime because the motivation for the threat or assault or whatever, was the person&#8217;s skin color, sexual orientation, religious beliefs or some other category seems like a &#8220;thought&#8221; crime to me. If I slug a guy because I hate the fact that my wife thinks he&#8217;s sexy, I get the time for assault and thats it. If I slug the guy because he is gay, I do the same time plus an enhancer. That is a little like going to jail because I think about a world without Dumbya as president. I guess where I am going with this is that the non liberal blogger was not really in left field in my opinion. I think he or she was wrong and the 9th Circuit was right, but I might well have come down differently a long, long time ago when my high school banned &#8220;Stop the War&#8221; t-shirts which certainly had the potential to incite disturbances&#8211;that is why we wanted to wear them. At the time I certainly thought my constituional rights were being infringed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
