<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supremes Slap Bush; Heads Explode</title>
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/</link>
	<description>Exposing the ugly truths about the Bush Administration.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: cialis online</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-66975</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 15:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-66975</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;cialis online&lt;/strong&gt;

news</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>cialis online</strong></p>
	<p>news
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: cheap phentermine</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-66642</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-66642</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;cheap phentermine&lt;/strong&gt;

news</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>cheap phentermine</strong></p>
	<p>news
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Britwit</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-18060</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 04:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-18060</guid>
					<description>&quot;Nice Doggie&quot; - what hatred and with the KKK symbol and symbol for jews.  Unbelievable.

Comment no 6 - Swami - it will be interesting, won't it.  I couldn't believe it when he actually brought up Congress.  Bush is totally out-of-control!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Nice Doggie&#8221; - what hatred and with the KKK symbol and symbol for jews.  Unbelievable.</p>
	<p>Comment no 6 - Swami - it will be interesting, won&#8217;t it.  I couldn&#8217;t believe it when he actually brought up Congress.  Bush is totally out-of-control!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: pgl</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-18033</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 13:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-18033</guid>
					<description>Maha - thanks.  I made the mistake of going to Tom's place to argue in favor of the Hamdan decision.  He and his commentators said nothing back to me about the decision or the issues rather playing the flame bait game and hurling insults.  I can see how an appropriate filter might apply to such behavior.  But there was one good result - I finally decided to check out your blog.  Thanks for indulging my little vent here.  And keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maha - thanks.  I made the mistake of going to Tom&#8217;s place to argue in favor of the Hamdan decision.  He and his commentators said nothing back to me about the decision or the issues rather playing the flame bait game and hurling insults.  I can see how an appropriate filter might apply to such behavior.  But there was one good result - I finally decided to check out your blog.  Thanks for indulging my little vent here.  And keep up the good work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-18021</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-18021</guid>
					<description>pgl -- I don't specifically remember banning Tom Maguire, but I make robust use of the twit filter here, so I don't question that I did ban Tom Maguire. 

I realized some time back that if I didn't exercise editorial control of the comments threads I'd have to eliminate comments or stop blogging. 

People get banned here for several reasons:

One, at least 80 percent of the comments righties leave here are juvenile personal insults of me or another commenter. That's a banning offense. I rarely give commenters a second chance. Same thing with comments that are obvious flame bait or intended to cause thread disruption.

Two, I refuse to allow this blog to be a conduit of rightie propaganda. So if someone leaves misinformation, rightie talking points, and similar lies, and I don't have time to correct the lies, I delete the post. Repeated attempts to leave such junk here results in a ban. 

Sometimes if I do engage in discussion with a rightie, after a time he'll just keep repeating the same arguments that I've already answered, which annoys the hell out of me. Banned.

Also, often righties come here from a right-wing site that links to one of my posts. But because the original right-wing site lied about what I wrote, they'll come over here to argue about what they've been told I said without having read what I actually did write. If they refuse to accept correction and continue to argue with me about something I didn't even say, they are outta here. You'd be amazed how often this happens, btw. 

I have one rule that sometimes gets lefties banned -- comments that promote the notion that the World Trade Center towers collapsed from controlled detonation instead of as a result of catastrophic structural failure resulting from terrorist attacks, or that link to sites promoting such nonsese, will be deleted, and repeated attempts to post such stuff here will get the poster banned. I don't like to do it, but I was an eyewitness to the collapse of the towers and the controlled detonation thing pushes my buttons. 

Finally, commenters who are eating too much of my time and energy get banned for any reason. If it's between them and me posting on this blog, I choose me. 

A lot of rightie bloggers complain, but you'd be amazed at how many rightie sites either don't permit comments at all, or who permit only registered commenters to post -- and registration has long been closed. Little Green Footballs is an example of the latter, not that I'd want to comment there. So let 'em complain, I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>pgl &#8212; I don&#8217;t specifically remember banning Tom Maguire, but I make robust use of the twit filter here, so I don&#8217;t question that I did ban Tom Maguire. </p>
	<p>I realized some time back that if I didn&#8217;t exercise editorial control of the comments threads I&#8217;d have to eliminate comments or stop blogging. </p>
	<p>People get banned here for several reasons:</p>
	<p>One, at least 80 percent of the comments righties leave here are juvenile personal insults of me or another commenter. That&#8217;s a banning offense. I rarely give commenters a second chance. Same thing with comments that are obvious flame bait or intended to cause thread disruption.</p>
	<p>Two, I refuse to allow this blog to be a conduit of rightie propaganda. So if someone leaves misinformation, rightie talking points, and similar lies, and I don&#8217;t have time to correct the lies, I delete the post. Repeated attempts to leave such junk here results in a ban. </p>
	<p>Sometimes if I do engage in discussion with a rightie, after a time he&#8217;ll just keep repeating the same arguments that I&#8217;ve already answered, which annoys the hell out of me. Banned.</p>
	<p>Also, often righties come here from a right-wing site that links to one of my posts. But because the original right-wing site lied about what I wrote, they&#8217;ll come over here to argue about what they&#8217;ve been told I said without having read what I actually did write. If they refuse to accept correction and continue to argue with me about something I didn&#8217;t even say, they are outta here. You&#8217;d be amazed how often this happens, btw. </p>
	<p>I have one rule that sometimes gets lefties banned &#8212; comments that promote the notion that the World Trade Center towers collapsed from controlled detonation instead of as a result of catastrophic structural failure resulting from terrorist attacks, or that link to sites promoting such nonsese, will be deleted, and repeated attempts to post such stuff here will get the poster banned. I don&#8217;t like to do it, but I was an eyewitness to the collapse of the towers and the controlled detonation thing pushes my buttons. </p>
	<p>Finally, commenters who are eating too much of my time and energy get banned for any reason. If it&#8217;s between them and me posting on this blog, I choose me. </p>
	<p>A lot of rightie bloggers complain, but you&#8217;d be amazed at how many rightie sites either don&#8217;t permit comments at all, or who permit only registered commenters to post &#8212; and registration has long been closed. Little Green Footballs is an example of the latter, not that I&#8217;d want to comment there. So let &#8216;em complain, I say.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: pgl</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-18017</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 22:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-18017</guid>
					<description>Nice summary of the back and forth.  The rightwing wants to make this a big campaign issue for 2006.  Their slogan - assuming they are honest - is that the US can't chew gum (have security) and walk (have liberty) at the same time.  We Democrats should disagree as our America  is a lot more capable than the National Review's America (OK, you have to read my Angrybear post) to know what I mean by the latter.  Cheers - PGL of Angrybear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nice summary of the back and forth.  The rightwing wants to make this a big campaign issue for 2006.  Their slogan - assuming they are honest - is that the US can&#8217;t chew gum (have security) and walk (have liberty) at the same time.  We Democrats should disagree as our America  is a lot more capable than the National Review&#8217;s America (OK, you have to read my Angrybear post) to know what I mean by the latter.  Cheers - PGL of Angrybear!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: pgl</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-18016</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 22:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-18016</guid>
					<description>I learned about this blog - which I'll have to check out - from a Tom Maguire comment over at his place as Tom attacks the majority decision in the Hamdan case.  Over at Angrybear, I'm with the majority on this one.

I have one small question for our host.  Tom does not seem to like you which is OK as he and his guests really turned on me.  Tom's complaint with me is that Angrybear allegedly blocked his comments at one point, which I said was not true.  Tom is now saying he never said that but never mind all of that.  His excuse for going after me is that you folks blocked his comments.  Not sure why (although I can imagine).  What is the deal with Tom these days?  

Now, I need to read your contribution to this important debate.  Thanks for letting me vent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I learned about this blog - which I&#8217;ll have to check out - from a Tom Maguire comment over at his place as Tom attacks the majority decision in the Hamdan case.  Over at Angrybear, I&#8217;m with the majority on this one.</p>
	<p>I have one small question for our host.  Tom does not seem to like you which is OK as he and his guests really turned on me.  Tom&#8217;s complaint with me is that Angrybear allegedly blocked his comments at one point, which I said was not true.  Tom is now saying he never said that but never mind all of that.  His excuse for going after me is that you folks blocked his comments.  Not sure why (although I can imagine).  What is the deal with Tom these days?  </p>
	<p>Now, I need to read your contribution to this important debate.  Thanks for letting me vent.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lynne</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-17998</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-17998</guid>
					<description>I was going to comment on the combination of hate name-calling and eliminationist language combined in a single sentence in Nice Doggie's blog ( which is supposed to be the sole prerogative of progressives, darn it!), but Steve M. beat me to it. Love the TM, by the way.
I was happy to hear that the Supreme Court is still ruling by law and sad to think that this might not last much longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I was going to comment on the combination of hate name-calling and eliminationist language combined in a single sentence in Nice Doggie&#8217;s blog ( which is supposed to be the sole prerogative of progressives, darn it!), but Steve M. beat me to it. Love the TM, by the way.<br />
I was happy to hear that the Supreme Court is still ruling by law and sad to think that this might not last much longer.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Swami</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-17922</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-17922</guid>
					<description>Bush has HOPES of circumventing the Supreme Court decision... more power to him, if he can do it. But included in the Courts ruling was the illegality of Article 3 of the Geneva Convention..How in the world will Bush and his legion of legal contortionist get around that one?..I guess we could always just scrap that worthless piece of paper also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Bush has HOPES of circumventing the Supreme Court decision&#8230; more power to him, if he can do it. But included in the Courts ruling was the illegality of Article 3 of the Geneva Convention..How in the world will Bush and his legion of legal contortionist get around that one?..I guess we could always just scrap that worthless piece of paper also.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: A. Citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-17917</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/06/29/supremes-slap-bush-heads-explode/#comment-17917</guid>
					<description>I sincerely hope that 'Nice Doggie', frikin' pooch don't look so nice actually, will get a crippling case of mange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I sincerely hope that &#8216;Nice Doggie&#8217;, frikin&#8217; pooch don&#8217;t look so nice actually, will get a crippling case of mange.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
