<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super Film Review</title>
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/</link>
	<description>Exposing the ugly truths about the Bush Administration.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: The Mahablog &#187; The American Way</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/#comment-18331</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/#comment-18331</guid>
					<description>[...] Goldberg tells us that &amp;#8220;conservative talk radio has surely gone overboard in bashing the film,&amp;#8221; which I say is one good reason to go see it (although there are others). But even though Goldberg admits the &amp;#8220;American Way&amp;#8221; line might irritate some overseas audiences, he sniffs about a &amp;#8220;cosmopolitan&amp;#8221; outlook &amp;#8220;that sees national boundaries and geographic loyalties as quaint and even backward.&amp;#8221; And taking a swipe at the majority opinion in Hamdan that stipulates the U.S. must honor its old commitment to the Geneva Conventions, Goldberg says there&amp;#8217;s nothing wrong with kicking off the shackles of international opinion and being the Lone Ranger. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] Goldberg tells us that &#8220;conservative talk radio has surely gone overboard in bashing the film,&#8221; which I say is one good reason to go see it (although there are others). But even though Goldberg admits the &#8220;American Way&#8221; line might irritate some overseas audiences, he sniffs about a &#8220;cosmopolitan&#8221; outlook &#8220;that sees national boundaries and geographic loyalties as quaint and even backward.&#8221; And taking a swipe at the majority opinion in Hamdan that stipulates the U.S. must honor its old commitment to the Geneva Conventions, Goldberg says there&#8217;s nothing wrong with kicking off the shackles of international opinion and being the Lone Ranger. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/#comment-18180</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 15:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/#comment-18180</guid>
					<description>coreyed -- agree. 

Re the negative reviews -- This film has a muted quality that applies to the characters as much as the colors. All the main characters are turned down several degrees from earlier films, by which I mean they are more realistic, less cartoon-y. Frank Langella's Perry White is a realistic big-city newspaper managing editor, for example. Kate Bosworth's Lois Lane is warmer and a lot less, well, slapstick than Margot Kidder's Lois Lane. Kevin Spacey's Lex Luthor may be an exception, because his  acts are over-the-top, but Spacey plays him very quietly and coldly instead of manically. Routh's Superman seems to me to be both more alien and more down-to-earth than previous Supermen, although the performance is subtle, and some reviewers complained that he lacked personality. IMO the muted quality made the film more of a romantic fantasy -- in which &quot;real&quot; people get caught up in a fantasy situation -- than action adventure, in which the characters mostly exist to carry forward the action. Since I prefer romantic fantasy to action adventure, I was perfectly happy with this. But I suspect the muted qualities just didn't work for some people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>coreyed &#8212; agree. </p>
	<p>Re the negative reviews &#8212; This film has a muted quality that applies to the characters as much as the colors. All the main characters are turned down several degrees from earlier films, by which I mean they are more realistic, less cartoon-y. Frank Langella&#8217;s Perry White is a realistic big-city newspaper managing editor, for example. Kate Bosworth&#8217;s Lois Lane is warmer and a lot less, well, slapstick than Margot Kidder&#8217;s Lois Lane. Kevin Spacey&#8217;s Lex Luthor may be an exception, because his  acts are over-the-top, but Spacey plays him very quietly and coldly instead of manically. Routh&#8217;s Superman seems to me to be both more alien and more down-to-earth than previous Supermen, although the performance is subtle, and some reviewers complained that he lacked personality. IMO the muted quality made the film more of a romantic fantasy &#8212; in which &#8220;real&#8221; people get caught up in a fantasy situation &#8212; than action adventure, in which the characters mostly exist to carry forward the action. Since I prefer romantic fantasy to action adventure, I was perfectly happy with this. But I suspect the muted qualities just didn&#8217;t work for some people.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: norbizness</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/#comment-18175</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 14:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/#comment-18175</guid>
					<description>No Otisburg, no deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No Otisburg, no deal.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: coreyd</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/#comment-18160</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 03:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/#comment-18160</guid>
					<description>gotta agree with ya on this one.  i don't believe i have ever enjoyed a film quite so much.  admittedly, i'm a HUGE superman fan, so some bias exists...but artistically, i was stunned.   in a good way.

the negative reviews stung me a bit; seems to me many viewers (&amp;#38; reviewers) didn't know what to make of such a high calibre, old-fashioned film.  in this day of overwhelming special effects and underwhelming storylines, audiences have come to expect non-stop action/special effects/elaborate fight scenes, ala the matrix or star wars episode iii.

i can only pray that the masses find themselves repeatedly drawn to the experience, spawning a character-driven renaissance of sorts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>gotta agree with ya on this one.  i don&#8217;t believe i have ever enjoyed a film quite so much.  admittedly, i&#8217;m a HUGE superman fan, so some bias exists&#8230;but artistically, i was stunned.   in a good way.</p>
	<p>the negative reviews stung me a bit; seems to me many viewers (&amp; reviewers) didn&#8217;t know what to make of such a high calibre, old-fashioned film.  in this day of overwhelming special effects and underwhelming storylines, audiences have come to expect non-stop action/special effects/elaborate fight scenes, ala the matrix or star wars episode iii.</p>
	<p>i can only pray that the masses find themselves repeatedly drawn to the experience, spawning a character-driven renaissance of sorts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
