<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super Film Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/</link>
	<description>Making the World Safe for Liberalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:09:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Mahablog &#187; The American Way</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-18331</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mahablog &#187; The American Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=823#comment-18331</guid>
		<description>[...] Goldberg tells us that &#8220;conservative talk radio has surely gone overboard in bashing the film,&#8221; which I say is one good reason to go see it (although there are others). But even though Goldberg admits the &#8220;American Way&#8221; line might irritate some overseas audiences, he sniffs about a &#8220;cosmopolitan&#8221; outlook &#8220;that sees national boundaries and geographic loyalties as quaint and even backward.&#8221; And taking a swipe at the majority opinion in Hamdan that stipulates the U.S. must honor its old commitment to the Geneva Conventions, Goldberg says there&#8217;s nothing wrong with kicking off the shackles of international opinion and being the Lone Ranger. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Goldberg tells us that &#8220;conservative talk radio has surely gone overboard in bashing the film,&#8221; which I say is one good reason to go see it (although there are others). But even though Goldberg admits the &#8220;American Way&#8221; line might irritate some overseas audiences, he sniffs about a &#8220;cosmopolitan&#8221; outlook &#8220;that sees national boundaries and geographic loyalties as quaint and even backward.&#8221; And taking a swipe at the majority opinion in Hamdan that stipulates the U.S. must honor its old commitment to the Geneva Conventions, Goldberg says there&#8217;s nothing wrong with kicking off the shackles of international opinion and being the Lone Ranger. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-18180</link>
		<dc:creator>maha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 15:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=823#comment-18180</guid>
		<description>coreyed -- agree. 

Re the negative reviews -- This film has a muted quality that applies to the characters as much as the colors. All the main characters are turned down several degrees from earlier films, by which I mean they are more realistic, less cartoon-y. Frank Langella&#039;s Perry White is a realistic big-city newspaper managing editor, for example. Kate Bosworth&#039;s Lois Lane is warmer and a lot less, well, slapstick than Margot Kidder&#039;s Lois Lane. Kevin Spacey&#039;s Lex Luthor may be an exception, because his  acts are over-the-top, but Spacey plays him very quietly and coldly instead of manically. Routh&#039;s Superman seems to me to be both more alien and more down-to-earth than previous Supermen, although the performance is subtle, and some reviewers complained that he lacked personality. IMO the muted quality made the film more of a romantic fantasy -- in which &quot;real&quot; people get caught up in a fantasy situation -- than action adventure, in which the characters mostly exist to carry forward the action. Since I prefer romantic fantasy to action adventure, I was perfectly happy with this. But I suspect the muted qualities just didn&#039;t work for some people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>coreyed &#8212; agree. </p>
<p>Re the negative reviews &#8212; This film has a muted quality that applies to the characters as much as the colors. All the main characters are turned down several degrees from earlier films, by which I mean they are more realistic, less cartoon-y. Frank Langella&#8217;s Perry White is a realistic big-city newspaper managing editor, for example. Kate Bosworth&#8217;s Lois Lane is warmer and a lot less, well, slapstick than Margot Kidder&#8217;s Lois Lane. Kevin Spacey&#8217;s Lex Luthor may be an exception, because his  acts are over-the-top, but Spacey plays him very quietly and coldly instead of manically. Routh&#8217;s Superman seems to me to be both more alien and more down-to-earth than previous Supermen, although the performance is subtle, and some reviewers complained that he lacked personality. IMO the muted quality made the film more of a romantic fantasy &#8212; in which &#8220;real&#8221; people get caught up in a fantasy situation &#8212; than action adventure, in which the characters mostly exist to carry forward the action. Since I prefer romantic fantasy to action adventure, I was perfectly happy with this. But I suspect the muted qualities just didn&#8217;t work for some people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norbizness</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-18175</link>
		<dc:creator>norbizness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 14:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=823#comment-18175</guid>
		<description>No Otisburg, no deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Otisburg, no deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coreyd</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/03/super-film-review/comment-page-1/#comment-18160</link>
		<dc:creator>coreyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 03:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=823#comment-18160</guid>
		<description>gotta agree with ya on this one.  i don&#039;t believe i have ever enjoyed a film quite so much.  admittedly, i&#039;m a HUGE superman fan, so some bias exists...but artistically, i was stunned.   in a good way.

the negative reviews stung me a bit; seems to me many viewers (&amp; reviewers) didn&#039;t know what to make of such a high calibre, old-fashioned film.  in this day of overwhelming special effects and underwhelming storylines, audiences have come to expect non-stop action/special effects/elaborate fight scenes, ala the matrix or star wars episode iii.

i can only pray that the masses find themselves repeatedly drawn to the experience, spawning a character-driven renaissance of sorts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gotta agree with ya on this one.  i don&#8217;t believe i have ever enjoyed a film quite so much.  admittedly, i&#8217;m a HUGE superman fan, so some bias exists&#8230;but artistically, i was stunned.   in a good way.</p>
<p>the negative reviews stung me a bit; seems to me many viewers (&amp; reviewers) didn&#8217;t know what to make of such a high calibre, old-fashioned film.  in this day of overwhelming special effects and underwhelming storylines, audiences have come to expect non-stop action/special effects/elaborate fight scenes, ala the matrix or star wars episode iii.</p>
<p>i can only pray that the masses find themselves repeatedly drawn to the experience, spawning a character-driven renaissance of sorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
