<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hypocrisies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/hypocrisies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/hypocrisies/</link>
	<description>Making the World Safe for Liberalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:46:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Mahablog &#187; The Crickets, They Chirp</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/hypocrisies/comment-page-1/#comment-19006</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mahablog &#187; The Crickets, They Chirp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 01:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=838#comment-19006</guid>
		<description>[...] To paraphrase the Confederate Yankee: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To paraphrase the Confederate Yankee: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahem</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/hypocrisies/comment-page-1/#comment-18896</link>
		<dc:creator>ahem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=838#comment-18896</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Maybe the first rule of blogging should be, Don’t dish out what you aren’t ready to get back tenfold.&lt;/i&gt;

Jeff just got his tenfold, then. He&#039;s been dishing it for years.

And modus potus is right. Although at least the web makes it possible for five-sigma folks to find each other for everlasting love. And Ms Frisch and Goldstein are certainly cut from the same cloth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Maybe the first rule of blogging should be, Don’t dish out what you aren’t ready to get back tenfold.</i></p>
<p>Jeff just got his tenfold, then. He&#8217;s been dishing it for years.</p>
<p>And modus potus is right. Although at least the web makes it possible for five-sigma folks to find each other for everlasting love. And Ms Frisch and Goldstein are certainly cut from the same cloth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/hypocrisies/comment-page-1/#comment-18808</link>
		<dc:creator>maha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=838#comment-18808</guid>
		<description>So, Michael, exactly what would you have us do? I wrote in the post above that &quot;If she [Frisch] said what is claimed she said, then she’s really awful and should be ashamed of herself.&quot; A great many other liberal bloggers have written that what Frisch wrote was inexcusable. But I guess that&#039;s not good enough.

You say we should &quot;eschew her presence&quot; -- dude, she&#039;s never been &quot;present&quot; in the political Left Blogosphere to &quot;eschew.&quot; &lt;em&gt;She&#039;s a nobody.&lt;/em&gt; None of us ever heard of her before Thursday. As acknowledged by rightie blogger &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/09/frisch-follow-up/#comment-18776&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Ugly American&lt;/a&gt; in the comments to another post, Frisch was getting about 16 - 35 site visits per day before last Thursday. This woman may call herself a &quot;liberal,&quot; but she has no standing whatsoever in the community of liberal bloggers who link to each other in virtual Liberal Bloggerland. Nor has she ever participated in that community, as far as I know. 

We cannot be soiled by association with her, because we have never associated with her. Got that? 

Although she may be a self-identified &quot;liberal,&quot; I spent some time reading through her archives the other day and found more stuff that I disagreed with than the other way around. She&#039;s basically just a whackjob.
&lt;em&gt;
What I read here is a lot of excuses, whining, and attempts to blame the right for bad behavior from one on the left. &lt;/em&gt;

You didn&#039;t even read my post or most of the other comments, did you?

&lt;em&gt;Typical for lefties, based on my observations.&lt;/em&gt;

As soon as you apologize for the right wingers who make obscene phone calls to me every time I piss them off, you have a right to be holier than thou. Until then -- you&#039;re &lt;em&gt;outtahere&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Michael, exactly what would you have us do? I wrote in the post above that &#8220;If she [Frisch] said what is claimed she said, then she’s really awful and should be ashamed of herself.&#8221; A great many other liberal bloggers have written that what Frisch wrote was inexcusable. But I guess that&#8217;s not good enough.</p>
<p>You say we should &#8220;eschew her presence&#8221; &#8212; dude, she&#8217;s never been &#8220;present&#8221; in the political Left Blogosphere to &#8220;eschew.&#8221; <em>She&#8217;s a nobody.</em> None of us ever heard of her before Thursday. As acknowledged by rightie blogger <a href="http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/09/frisch-follow-up/#comment-18776" rel="nofollow">The Ugly American</a> in the comments to another post, Frisch was getting about 16 &#8211; 35 site visits per day before last Thursday. This woman may call herself a &#8220;liberal,&#8221; but she has no standing whatsoever in the community of liberal bloggers who link to each other in virtual Liberal Bloggerland. Nor has she ever participated in that community, as far as I know. </p>
<p>We cannot be soiled by association with her, because we have never associated with her. Got that? </p>
<p>Although she may be a self-identified &#8220;liberal,&#8221; I spent some time reading through her archives the other day and found more stuff that I disagreed with than the other way around. She&#8217;s basically just a whackjob.<br />
<em><br />
What I read here is a lot of excuses, whining, and attempts to blame the right for bad behavior from one on the left. </em></p>
<p>You didn&#8217;t even read my post or most of the other comments, did you?</p>
<p><em>Typical for lefties, based on my observations.</em></p>
<p>As soon as you apologize for the right wingers who make obscene phone calls to me every time I piss them off, you have a right to be holier than thou. Until then &#8212; you&#8217;re <em>outtahere</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/hypocrisies/comment-page-1/#comment-18805</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=838#comment-18805</guid>
		<description>Frisch is a liberal - a lefty.  She&#039;s a nitwit and a lot of other things too, but she&#039;s in the liberal camp.  Either liberals tolerate her bad behavior and therefore are soiled by the association, or they eschew her presence and disavow her acts.  What I read here is a lot of excuses, whining, and attempts to blame the right for bad behavior from one on the left.  Typical for lefties, based on my observations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frisch is a liberal &#8211; a lefty.  She&#8217;s a nitwit and a lot of other things too, but she&#8217;s in the liberal camp.  Either liberals tolerate her bad behavior and therefore are soiled by the association, or they eschew her presence and disavow her acts.  What I read here is a lot of excuses, whining, and attempts to blame the right for bad behavior from one on the left.  Typical for lefties, based on my observations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fshk</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/hypocrisies/comment-page-1/#comment-18804</link>
		<dc:creator>fshk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=838#comment-18804</guid>
		<description>Dude, righties? If you want the rest of us to stand up and condemn what may or may not have even been said by some chick with a blog in AZ? Then I demand you apologize, for starters, for every racist thing La Malkin has ever said, for every threat to the physical person of a liberal blogger that any crazy guy with a keyboard has ever made, for every time some rightie blogger called a feminist blogger a whore. Eh? Yeah, I didn&#039;t think so. 

Deb Frisch is like that girl at the party that no one invited, who got too drunk and started saying obscene things. Everyone in attendance kind of looks around and wonders who invited her, and then they proceed to ignore her because they don&#039;t want to applaud her behavior by giving her attention. 

Y&#039;all hate Deb Frisch so much? Her traffic is through the roof. Congrats for making her blog successful! Here&#039;s a cookie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, righties? If you want the rest of us to stand up and condemn what may or may not have even been said by some chick with a blog in AZ? Then I demand you apologize, for starters, for every racist thing La Malkin has ever said, for every threat to the physical person of a liberal blogger that any crazy guy with a keyboard has ever made, for every time some rightie blogger called a feminist blogger a whore. Eh? Yeah, I didn&#8217;t think so. </p>
<p>Deb Frisch is like that girl at the party that no one invited, who got too drunk and started saying obscene things. Everyone in attendance kind of looks around and wonders who invited her, and then they proceed to ignore her because they don&#8217;t want to applaud her behavior by giving her attention. </p>
<p>Y&#8217;all hate Deb Frisch so much? Her traffic is through the roof. Congrats for making her blog successful! Here&#8217;s a cookie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckone</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/hypocrisies/comment-page-1/#comment-18781</link>
		<dc:creator>ckone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=838#comment-18781</guid>
		<description>Thank you Swami!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Swami!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin K.</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/hypocrisies/comment-page-1/#comment-18758</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=838#comment-18758</guid>
		<description>I apologize for being human.  Will that cover it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize for being human.  Will that cover it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/hypocrisies/comment-page-1/#comment-18737</link>
		<dc:creator>maha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=838#comment-18737</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;But what if this person is a member of your fraternity?&lt;/em&gt;

But, son, she ain&#039;t. That&#039;s the point. Everybody agrees that what she said was real nasty, but she ain&#039;t one o&#039; our&#039;n. That was the point of the post you were dumb enough to comment on without actually reading first.

And since commenting without reading posts is a hangin&#039; offense in these parts, buckaroo, say hi to your buddies in the twit filter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>But what if this person is a member of your fraternity?</em></p>
<p>But, son, she ain&#8217;t. That&#8217;s the point. Everybody agrees that what she said was real nasty, but she ain&#8217;t one o&#8217; our&#8217;n. That was the point of the post you were dumb enough to comment on without actually reading first.</p>
<p>And since commenting without reading posts is a hangin&#8217; offense in these parts, buckaroo, say hi to your buddies in the twit filter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/hypocrisies/comment-page-1/#comment-18736</link>
		<dc:creator>maha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=838#comment-18736</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Had he the resources to pay for a $10.00 a month plan he might have survived the traffic that his wimping generated.&lt;/i&gt;

Is that the problem? These days, $10 a month can get you a whole lotta bandwidth. I&#039;m not even paying that much, and I get, like, a lot. Some number in the gigabytes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Had he the resources to pay for a $10.00 a month plan he might have survived the traffic that his wimping generated.</i></p>
<p>Is that the problem? These days, $10 a month can get you a whole lotta bandwidth. I&#8217;m not even paying that much, and I get, like, a lot. Some number in the gigabytes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/hypocrisies/comment-page-1/#comment-18716</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=838#comment-18716</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Brad....we don&#039;t own her. Whoever she is, she is now owned by the righties for their purpose of making  straw-person generalities.   Please provide links to the &#039;&lt;strong&gt;millions&lt;/strong&gt; of Arabs dancing in the street&#039; story you assert.  Also, please acknowledge directly what Maha and posters here have said about this woman&#039;s words.   And, if you dare to be courageous, please comment on the &#039;barbaric actions&#039; of wingers exhorting the alerting of child molesters to the whereabouts of children belonging to NYT&#039;s employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Brad&#8230;.we don&#8217;t own her. Whoever she is, she is now owned by the righties for their purpose of making  straw-person generalities.   Please provide links to the &#8216;<strong>millions</strong> of Arabs dancing in the street&#8217; story you assert.  Also, please acknowledge directly what Maha and posters here have said about this woman&#8217;s words.   And, if you dare to be courageous, please comment on the &#8216;barbaric actions&#8217; of wingers exhorting the alerting of child molesters to the whereabouts of children belonging to NYT&#8217;s employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
