<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Identity Crises</title>
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/</link>
	<description>Exposing the ugly truths about the Bush Administration.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-527471</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 13:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-527471</guid>
					<description>The English people are most definately starting to proclaim their identity as English and not British,since the devolution of scotland and wales we English have been subjected to a blizzard of attacks on our nationhood,one govt minister even went so far as to say in a speech that there was no such nation as the English,that came as quite a shock to the 50million or so people who class themselves as English.further to that the so called celtic countries,scotland wales and northern ireland have made it quite clear that they do not consider themselves to be British,they make plain their hate for the English(while holding out the begging bowl for English subsidies,scotland alone gets some 20 billion dollars a year in subsidies)and this and other factors such as the shameful pandering to militant islam at the expense of English custom and culture, rampant immigration which the native English have been denied a say about,the constant lying from the govt about the EU has all contributed to the rise of the new English nationalism and sense of identity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The English people are most definately starting to proclaim their identity as English and not British,since the devolution of scotland and wales we English have been subjected to a blizzard of attacks on our nationhood,one govt minister even went so far as to say in a speech that there was no such nation as the English,that came as quite a shock to the 50million or so people who class themselves as English.further to that the so called celtic countries,scotland wales and northern ireland have made it quite clear that they do not consider themselves to be British,they make plain their hate for the English(while holding out the begging bowl for English subsidies,scotland alone gets some 20 billion dollars a year in subsidies)and this and other factors such as the shameful pandering to militant islam at the expense of English custom and culture, rampant immigration which the native English have been denied a say about,the constant lying from the govt about the EU has all contributed to the rise of the new English nationalism and sense of identity.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-64515</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-64515</guid>
					<description>AS  a  proud  Welsh  and  Brittish  man, something  that  has  always  frustrated  me  is  how Americans  constantly  refer  to  Britain as England, and  the  British  as  English. It  saddens  me  that  their  arrogance, however  unintended  and  well  meaning, has caused  many  millions  in  America  to  lose  sight  of  what  a  great  contribution  Wales  and  the  Welsh  have  made  to  America. For  example, and  this  is  just  a  small  example: Thomas  Jefferson  was  asecond  generation  welshman, and  is  rumoured  to  have  spoken  Welsh. Jefferson  Davies  was  of  very  strong  Welsh  decent  as  was  obviously  his  Welsh  born  second  wife. 17  of  the  50  odd  signers  of  the  dec. of. indep. were  welsh  or  of  welsh  decent- by  far  the  largest  ethnic  group. Yale  and  Harvard  were  founded  by  Welshmen. As  was  the  state  of  Penn. Many  other  Presidents  and  Generals  were  Welsh. And  to  this  day  the  US  census  has  it  that  over  2 million  Americans  still  consider  themselfes  Welsh Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>AS  a  proud  Welsh  and  Brittish  man, something  that  has  always  frustrated  me  is  how Americans  constantly  refer  to  Britain as England, and  the  British  as  English. It  saddens  me  that  their  arrogance, however  unintended  and  well  meaning, has caused  many  millions  in  America  to  lose  sight  of  what  a  great  contribution  Wales  and  the  Welsh  have  made  to  America. For  example, and  this  is  just  a  small  example: Thomas  Jefferson  was  asecond  generation  welshman, and  is  rumoured  to  have  spoken  Welsh. Jefferson  Davies  was  of  very  strong  Welsh  decent  as  was  obviously  his  Welsh  born  second  wife. 17  of  the  50  odd  signers  of  the  dec. of. indep. were  welsh  or  of  welsh  decent- by  far  the  largest  ethnic  group. Yale  and  Harvard  were  founded  by  Welshmen. As  was  the  state  of  Penn. Many  other  Presidents  and  Generals  were  Welsh. And  to  this  day  the  US  census  has  it  that  over  2 million  Americans  still  consider  themselfes  Welsh Americans.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Silurian</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18895</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18895</guid>
					<description>Re: Brit's!
Chief...Your description of the origin of the Name 'POME' is wrong!
Firstly, It isn't the British! It's the English in particular that are referred to as 'Pommes' &amp;#38;/or 'Limie's!' And this stems from the english empire's ocean trotting day's when english officer's would insist on their crew consuming 'potatoe's &amp;#38; lime's' (for the starch &amp;#38; citrus etc.) during long journey's like to Australia &amp;#38; NZ &amp;#38; back as this would prevent illness's such as scurvy etc. ('Pomme' comes from the French word for Potato - Pomme de Terre!) As for the 'Prisoner Of Mother England' bit, that would be strange as NZ &amp;#38; Australia where penal colonies to the english and thus anybody who did not give way to the english crown or remain subservient (for the most part the Welsh, Scot's &amp;#38; Irish!) were sent there on prison ships! Therefore, the prisoners of mother england would be the ancesters of most white Australian's &amp;#38; Kiwi's!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Re: Brit&#8217;s!<br />
Chief&#8230;Your description of the origin of the Name &#8216;POME&#8217; is wrong!<br />
Firstly, It isn&#8217;t the British! It&#8217;s the English in particular that are referred to as &#8216;Pommes&#8217; &amp;/or &#8216;Limie&#8217;s!&#8217; And this stems from the english empire&#8217;s ocean trotting day&#8217;s when english officer&#8217;s would insist on their crew consuming &#8216;potatoe&#8217;s &amp; lime&#8217;s&#8217; (for the starch &amp; citrus etc.) during long journey&#8217;s like to Australia &amp; NZ &amp; back as this would prevent illness&#8217;s such as scurvy etc. (&#8217;Pomme&#8217; comes from the French word for Potato - Pomme de Terre!) As for the &#8216;Prisoner Of Mother England&#8217; bit, that would be strange as NZ &amp; Australia where penal colonies to the english and thus anybody who did not give way to the english crown or remain subservient (for the most part the Welsh, Scot&#8217;s &amp; Irish!) were sent there on prison ships! Therefore, the prisoners of mother england would be the ancesters of most white Australian&#8217;s &amp; Kiwi&#8217;s!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18870</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18870</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;They just aren’t into long, noisy outpourings of grief, panic or whatnot the way we Americans are.&lt;/i&gt;

I seem to remember they were pretty demonstrative when Diana died. Also, &lt;em&gt;English&lt;/em&gt; jingoism has had some nasty effects on many of the nations they occupied. Ask the Welsh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>They just aren’t into long, noisy outpourings of grief, panic or whatnot the way we Americans are.</i></p>
	<p>I seem to remember they were pretty demonstrative when Diana died. Also, <em>English</em> jingoism has had some nasty effects on many of the nations they occupied. Ask the Welsh.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kaleberg</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18865</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18865</guid>
					<description>The British have long been much less demonstrative than the peoples of many other nations. They just aren't into long, noisy outpourings of grief, panic or whatnot the way we Americans are. Remember WWII. Life went on during the Blitz. That was the whole British thing. Yes, you were being bombed, get over it. Are you dead? No, then get to work, go out and party. George Orwell had some good essays on this, but I think it was Bruce McCall, the parodist, who put it best with his London Times headline coverage of the bombing of Parliament, &quot;Temper, Temper, Mr. Hitler&quot;.

The British have always been much less jingo that most nations. Some speculate that this is because they had a naval empire, so there was little military presence visible. Soldiers rarely wore uniform off duty. In fact, even during war time, you'd get pubs with signs saying &quot;no redcoats&quot;. Kipling had a fair bit to say about that.  

While Americans and many others glory in tales of conquest and victory, the Brits tend to think of that as bragging. Anyone who reads British battle poetry, try the Anglo Saxon Battle of Beornenborg or The Charge of the Light Brigade, would think that the Brits were military incompetents. Of course, anyone looking at a map of the empire would realize otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The British have long been much less demonstrative than the peoples of many other nations. They just aren&#8217;t into long, noisy outpourings of grief, panic or whatnot the way we Americans are. Remember WWII. Life went on during the Blitz. That was the whole British thing. Yes, you were being bombed, get over it. Are you dead? No, then get to work, go out and party. George Orwell had some good essays on this, but I think it was Bruce McCall, the parodist, who put it best with his London Times headline coverage of the bombing of Parliament, &#8220;Temper, Temper, Mr. Hitler&#8221;.</p>
	<p>The British have always been much less jingo that most nations. Some speculate that this is because they had a naval empire, so there was little military presence visible. Soldiers rarely wore uniform off duty. In fact, even during war time, you&#8217;d get pubs with signs saying &#8220;no redcoats&#8221;. Kipling had a fair bit to say about that.  </p>
	<p>While Americans and many others glory in tales of conquest and victory, the Brits tend to think of that as bragging. Anyone who reads British battle poetry, try the Anglo Saxon Battle of Beornenborg or The Charge of the Light Brigade, would think that the Brits were military incompetents. Of course, anyone looking at a map of the empire would realize otherwise.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chief</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18608</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 11:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18608</guid>
					<description>Maha,  brilliant post.

Re: Brits.  I have never been to the British Isles but have spent some time in New Zealand.  The Kiwis have a term for those that are too-o-o-o British.  The term is POME ( pronounced: Pom-ey) which means Prisoner of Mother England.  It is said with a dismissive tone of voice. 

Re: Muslims.  My understanding after reading Karen Armstrong's &quot;Islam: A Short History&quot; is that (I paraphrase) a muslim is a man or a woman who has made this submission (surrender) of their entire being to Allah and his demand that human beings behave to one another with justice, equity and compassion.  

So it is not surprising that the ummah tugs hardest at their heartstrings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maha,  brilliant post.</p>
	<p>Re: Brits.  I have never been to the British Isles but have spent some time in New Zealand.  The Kiwis have a term for those that are too-o-o-o British.  The term is POME ( pronounced: Pom-ey) which means Prisoner of Mother England.  It is said with a dismissive tone of voice. </p>
	<p>Re: Muslims.  My understanding after reading Karen Armstrong&#8217;s &#8220;Islam: A Short History&#8221; is that (I paraphrase) a muslim is a man or a woman who has made this submission (surrender) of their entire being to Allah and his demand that human beings behave to one another with justice, equity and compassion.  </p>
	<p>So it is not surprising that the ummah tugs hardest at their heartstrings.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Doug Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18564</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 00:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18564</guid>
					<description>&quot;What are the 13 percent so angry about?&quot;  maha

That's a brilliant question. I heard that a recent poll in Iraq set at 80% - the number who think it's OK to kill Americans in Iraq. The number who disapproved of our occupation was high before Abu Gherig (sorry if I spelled it wrong) and before the murder of 24 unarmed civilians in reprisal for a roadside bomb and before the gang rape of a young Iraqi woman, and her murder with her parents and 5 year old sister. They were angry before they were told that the ex-soldier who masterminded the rape-murder will NOT be extradited. (Imagine if it was an American woman and her family and the perp was from France? Would you be satisfied to let the French try the case?)

To understand their feelings, you have to understand they are still living the crusades over there like a VERY few Southerners still live the Civil War. The occupation and brutal murders of  Muslims by Christians is not the subject of talk around a cracker barrel. They are still angry; still bent on getting even, and every infraction by the US proves in their minds that WE are the barbarians and nothing has changed since the Middle Ages. 

Before someone takes me wrong. I am a veteran. The vast majority of GIs who go over there intend to prove to the Muslim world that we have no malice or evil intentions. They walk into a brick wall. An unknown 'terrorist' detonates a  BIG underground IED that are so well concealed that the locals HAD to have seen the bomb being planted. If your buddy gets turned into a new pizza topping in the same neighborhood where you came through with food and medical help last week, your attitude changes. The folks who smiled and accepted charity did NOTHING to save your comrade. Most GIs will not go postal and blow away civilians, but the love and mercy thing evaporates, too. That gets lost in the rhetoric.

For me it's not hard. In the Declaration of Independence it says as a general principle governments &quot;deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed&quot; . So in Iraq, the voting majority shoud be the ones to decide what Congress, the President and the Iraqi governments are debating. The Prez is so damn happy about democracy there let them decide in an election 2 questions. When shoud the Americans start to leave? When should the departure be final? Let it be a multiple choice selection and let it be binding.

I am willing to be bound by the outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;What are the 13 percent so angry about?&#8221;  maha</p>
	<p>That&#8217;s a brilliant question. I heard that a recent poll in Iraq set at 80% - the number who think it&#8217;s OK to kill Americans in Iraq. The number who disapproved of our occupation was high before Abu Gherig (sorry if I spelled it wrong) and before the murder of 24 unarmed civilians in reprisal for a roadside bomb and before the gang rape of a young Iraqi woman, and her murder with her parents and 5 year old sister. They were angry before they were told that the ex-soldier who masterminded the rape-murder will NOT be extradited. (Imagine if it was an American woman and her family and the perp was from France? Would you be satisfied to let the French try the case?)</p>
	<p>To understand their feelings, you have to understand they are still living the crusades over there like a VERY few Southerners still live the Civil War. The occupation and brutal murders of  Muslims by Christians is not the subject of talk around a cracker barrel. They are still angry; still bent on getting even, and every infraction by the US proves in their minds that WE are the barbarians and nothing has changed since the Middle Ages. </p>
	<p>Before someone takes me wrong. I am a veteran. The vast majority of GIs who go over there intend to prove to the Muslim world that we have no malice or evil intentions. They walk into a brick wall. An unknown &#8216;terrorist&#8217; detonates a  BIG underground IED that are so well concealed that the locals HAD to have seen the bomb being planted. If your buddy gets turned into a new pizza topping in the same neighborhood where you came through with food and medical help last week, your attitude changes. The folks who smiled and accepted charity did NOTHING to save your comrade. Most GIs will not go postal and blow away civilians, but the love and mercy thing evaporates, too. That gets lost in the rhetoric.</p>
	<p>For me it&#8217;s not hard. In the Declaration of Independence it says as a general principle governments &#8220;deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed&#8221; . So in Iraq, the voting majority shoud be the ones to decide what Congress, the President and the Iraqi governments are debating. The Prez is so damn happy about democracy there let them decide in an election 2 questions. When shoud the Americans start to leave? When should the departure be final? Let it be a multiple choice selection and let it be binding.</p>
	<p>I am willing to be bound by the outcome.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Avedon</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18561</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 23:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18561</guid>
					<description>I think the unofficial British anthem is probably &quot;Jerusalem&quot; (or maybe &quot;Rule Brittania&quot;).  I'd prefer &quot;Land of Hope and Glory&quot; - Elgar really hated chauvinism and that sort of thing, and anyway, it's a good piece of music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think the unofficial British anthem is probably &#8220;Jerusalem&#8221; (or maybe &#8220;Rule Brittania&#8221;).  I&#8217;d prefer &#8220;Land of Hope and Glory&#8221; - Elgar really hated chauvinism and that sort of thing, and anyway, it&#8217;s a good piece of music.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan S.</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18560</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 23:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18560</guid>
					<description>Even if the post never mentioned Malkin, it would put her to shame just by virtue of existing, and the implicit contrast between the two reactions . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Even if the post never mentioned Malkin, it would put her to shame just by virtue of existing, and the implicit contrast between the two reactions . . .
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lilybelle</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18555</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 22:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/07/08/identity-crises/#comment-18555</guid>
					<description>Absolutely brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Absolutely brilliant.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
