<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Image and Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mahablog.com/2006/08/28/image-and-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/08/28/image-and-action/</link>
	<description>Making the World Safe for Liberalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:26:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/08/28/image-and-action/comment-page-1/#comment-32112</link>
		<dc:creator>maha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=978#comment-32112</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I thought that the President’s speaches just after 9/11 were at his usual level, i.e., unwatchable. &lt;/i&gt;

He didn&#039;t win me over, either. His address to Congress a few days after 9/11 received wild acclaim, you might recall -- that was the &quot;let&#039;s roll&quot; speech -- but it struck me at the time as being all rhetoric, no content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I thought that the President’s speaches just after 9/11 were at his usual level, i.e., unwatchable. </i></p>
<p>He didn&#8217;t win me over, either. His address to Congress a few days after 9/11 received wild acclaim, you might recall &#8212; that was the &#8220;let&#8217;s roll&#8221; speech &#8212; but it struck me at the time as being all rhetoric, no content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/08/28/image-and-action/comment-page-1/#comment-32111</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=978#comment-32111</guid>
		<description>I thought that the President&#039;s speaches just after 9/11 were at his usual level, i.e., unwatchable. I think that a lot of people wanted to be reassured, and they projected that upon him. But then, I was one of the 30% who never drunk the Kook-aid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that the President&#8217;s speaches just after 9/11 were at his usual level, i.e., unwatchable. I think that a lot of people wanted to be reassured, and they projected that upon him. But then, I was one of the 30% who never drunk the Kook-aid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost of Joe Liebling's Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/08/28/image-and-action/comment-page-1/#comment-32101</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost of Joe Liebling's Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=978#comment-32101</guid>
		<description>When I was actively blogging, it occurred to me that if the Bush administration consistently appears to be run by utter incompetents, that may be simply that I am judging their achievements in relation to their stated goals.

I thought about that and eventually asked myself what someone who ignored their stated goals would make of their actual accomplishments. 

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Actions speak louder than words.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I think that someone who evaluated them that way would decide that they&#039;re actually a fairly competent bunch of thieves and con-artists, and that they have no more interest in their stated policy goals than will harmonize with funneling an awful lot of our money to their cronies.

That explains their work as well as anything else I can come up with.

With kind regards,
Dog, etc.
&lt;i&gt;searching for home&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was actively blogging, it occurred to me that if the Bush administration consistently appears to be run by utter incompetents, that may be simply that I am judging their achievements in relation to their stated goals.</p>
<p>I thought about that and eventually asked myself what someone who ignored their stated goals would make of their actual accomplishments. </p>
<p><i>&#8220;Actions speak louder than words.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I think that someone who evaluated them that way would decide that they&#8217;re actually a fairly competent bunch of thieves and con-artists, and that they have no more interest in their stated policy goals than will harmonize with funneling an awful lot of our money to their cronies.</p>
<p>That explains their work as well as anything else I can come up with.</p>
<p>With kind regards,<br />
Dog, etc.<br />
<i>searching for home</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/08/28/image-and-action/comment-page-1/#comment-32074</link>
		<dc:creator>terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=978#comment-32074</guid>
		<description>What you all seem to be saying is that Bush and his henchmen&#039;s rhetoric, spin,disinformation, propoganda etc is very very good, but there is no substance. I agree. One of the tricks that Bush et al use with regularity is the straw man. Those who disagree with the tactics employed such as warrantless wire taps do not want to fight the &quot;war on terrosim&quot; or as I guess they are now calling it the war on Islamic facism whatever the hell that means.Of course that is not the case--we just think our constitution means something and we are loathe to give up our liberties because of the incompetence of those who currently hold high office in this country. Cheny used that particular straw man in a speech I heard on C-span last night. Today I heard a couple of folks make the argument that the criticism about the federal response to Katrina is misplaced because good Americans would not look to the government to bail them out in the first place. Another straw man. Conservatives have every right to debate the size of government. While I happen to disagree with their position, the point here is that the federal government did assume responsibility in connection with Katrina, took my hard earned tax dollars to discharge that responsibility and made a total and complete hash of it. That was due to the incompetence of Bush, the political cronies he appointed to important positions and the corruption that has been particularly rampant since the GOP took over all branches of government. Why do they get away with this? IMHO because of the total and complete abdication of responsibility by the mainstream media. Thank heavens there are blogs like this one to provide some small amount of truth in the national discourse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you all seem to be saying is that Bush and his henchmen&#8217;s rhetoric, spin,disinformation, propoganda etc is very very good, but there is no substance. I agree. One of the tricks that Bush et al use with regularity is the straw man. Those who disagree with the tactics employed such as warrantless wire taps do not want to fight the &#8220;war on terrosim&#8221; or as I guess they are now calling it the war on Islamic facism whatever the hell that means.Of course that is not the case&#8211;we just think our constitution means something and we are loathe to give up our liberties because of the incompetence of those who currently hold high office in this country. Cheny used that particular straw man in a speech I heard on C-span last night. Today I heard a couple of folks make the argument that the criticism about the federal response to Katrina is misplaced because good Americans would not look to the government to bail them out in the first place. Another straw man. Conservatives have every right to debate the size of government. While I happen to disagree with their position, the point here is that the federal government did assume responsibility in connection with Katrina, took my hard earned tax dollars to discharge that responsibility and made a total and complete hash of it. That was due to the incompetence of Bush, the political cronies he appointed to important positions and the corruption that has been particularly rampant since the GOP took over all branches of government. Why do they get away with this? IMHO because of the total and complete abdication of responsibility by the mainstream media. Thank heavens there are blogs like this one to provide some small amount of truth in the national discourse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the talking dog</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/08/28/image-and-action/comment-page-1/#comment-32002</link>
		<dc:creator>the talking dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 03:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=978#comment-32002</guid>
		<description>Bush , and the ancestral ranch he has owned since all of 1999, pretty much are both best described as &quot;all hat, no cattle.&quot;  His ranch is the very IMAGE of a working ranch, albeit a clean one, uncontaminated, say, by any livestock or anything like that.

What I&#039;ll remember of 9-11 was that the acting President of the United States was Karen Hughes... the actual president seemed to be on a cross-country joyride.  Ironic, given that he was a short car ride away from Central Command at McDill AFB near Tampa at the time the nation (or at least, those of us expendable people in lower Manhattan and Brooklyn who didn&#039;t vote for the whiny, phony little bastard and therefore really didn&#039;t need it anyway) needed some level of reassurance that our nation was remotely capable of protecting us... got nothin&#039;.

Which is pretty much what the po&#039; folks  in New Orleans got as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush , and the ancestral ranch he has owned since all of 1999, pretty much are both best described as &#8220;all hat, no cattle.&#8221;  His ranch is the very IMAGE of a working ranch, albeit a clean one, uncontaminated, say, by any livestock or anything like that.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;ll remember of 9-11 was that the acting President of the United States was Karen Hughes&#8230; the actual president seemed to be on a cross-country joyride.  Ironic, given that he was a short car ride away from Central Command at McDill AFB near Tampa at the time the nation (or at least, those of us expendable people in lower Manhattan and Brooklyn who didn&#8217;t vote for the whiny, phony little bastard and therefore really didn&#8217;t need it anyway) needed some level of reassurance that our nation was remotely capable of protecting us&#8230; got nothin&#8217;.</p>
<p>Which is pretty much what the po&#8217; folks  in New Orleans got as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joanr16</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/08/28/image-and-action/comment-page-1/#comment-31999</link>
		<dc:creator>joanr16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 03:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=978#comment-31999</guid>
		<description>Lord help me if I ever dream about Dubya; it&#039;ll be icepick lobotomy time, the instant I wake up.

Not having cable, and thus cut out of watching Spike Lee&#039;s Katrina films, I settled for tonight&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Dateline&lt;/i&gt; with Brian Williams.  Yes, I know; all msm is shudder-inducing.  But a year later, Bri is still one very pissed-off American.  He may not carry the moral weight of Uncle Walter finally blowing the lid off the debacle of &#039;Nam, but he reiterated every skin-crawling, heart-wrenching, fist-clenching horror of those five days last year, and I found myself boiling over with rage all over again.  If anyone else was watching, and they have a functioning heart and brain, I expect they were feeling exactly the same.

And the election is 10 weeks from tomorrow....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lord help me if I ever dream about Dubya; it&#8217;ll be icepick lobotomy time, the instant I wake up.</p>
<p>Not having cable, and thus cut out of watching Spike Lee&#8217;s Katrina films, I settled for tonight&#8217;s <i>Dateline</i> with Brian Williams.  Yes, I know; all msm is shudder-inducing.  But a year later, Bri is still one very pissed-off American.  He may not carry the moral weight of Uncle Walter finally blowing the lid off the debacle of &#8216;Nam, but he reiterated every skin-crawling, heart-wrenching, fist-clenching horror of those five days last year, and I found myself boiling over with rage all over again.  If anyone else was watching, and they have a functioning heart and brain, I expect they were feeling exactly the same.</p>
<p>And the election is 10 weeks from tomorrow&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moonbat</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/08/28/image-and-action/comment-page-1/#comment-31985</link>
		<dc:creator>moonbat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 01:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=978#comment-31985</guid>
		<description>What do you expect from a cheerleader? 

You have to discount everything the guy &lt;i&gt;says&lt;/i&gt; - which is purely there for public manipulation - and look what his regime actually &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt;:

- The regime starts wars overseas, over phony reasons, because the rich and powerful want them. Realize that Bush and Cheney are oilmen. We wouldn&#039;t be in Iraq if the principal export was grapefruit.

- The regime turns all problems and disasters, large (Katrina) and more quiet ones (the unaffordability of health care) into opportunities to improve their political position. They are plainly not interested in solving these problems for the benefit of all. They are plainly interested in using them to gain more power for themselves.

In every case, government is a tool to be used to the regime&#039;s political advantage. It is a profit center. So is the entire country for that matter, something to be milked in as many ways possible.

As such, Bush plays a very important role - he&#039;s the PR guy who placates the rubes. Despite his upper class origins, he has managed to skillfully affect a lower class vibe that attracts lots of under-achievers like himself. You could have a beer with this guy. As such, he&#039;s a very important player in the right&#039;s takeover of this country. He&#039;s just the front guy, he&#039;s not the one who&#039;s really calling the shots, in many cases. Others, like Cheney or Rove, with Junior&#039;s blessing, create the context, or the situations that Junior finds himself in, performing in front of the public.

Actions speak louder than words. Turn down the volume on Bush and see what his regime is really doing.

-- 

I hope you don&#039;t mind me going a little OT.

I had a dream last night, where I was speaking with George Bush. He was very open, friendly, and candid with me, and I felt disarmed and drawn into his circle of acquaintanceship. I was mostly listening in the dream, and not challenging him on anything political, both because he disarmed me, and because it was evident in the dream that he was insane.

In the dream, he spoke about how he never liked &quot;El Shaddai&quot; or something similar - Bush mangled the phrase, and it was to him an abbreviation for a nonsensical saying, which he spelled out to me, but I don&#039;t remember. In my waking life, I know thise phrase to be a synonym for God, particularly God the Father. In the dream Bush went on to say that he wanted to &quot;blow up the sky&quot;, meaning climb into an F-16 or other jet and start blowing things up.

The rest of the dream involved me finding others in the military or government to somehow stop this guy. What was interesting is that nobody needed convincing that the man was insane and needed to be stopped. It was just a question of how.

Lots of Oedipal themes here, and what was so real to me was Bush&#039;s utter childishness and the completely open way he revealed his childishness. It was like conversing with a six year old who happened to be at the head of the most powerful nation on earth.

I hope this was at least entertaining, to me it was also revealing. Thanks for indulging me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you expect from a cheerleader? </p>
<p>You have to discount everything the guy <i>says</i> &#8211; which is purely there for public manipulation &#8211; and look what his regime actually <i>does</i>:</p>
<p>- The regime starts wars overseas, over phony reasons, because the rich and powerful want them. Realize that Bush and Cheney are oilmen. We wouldn&#8217;t be in Iraq if the principal export was grapefruit.</p>
<p>- The regime turns all problems and disasters, large (Katrina) and more quiet ones (the unaffordability of health care) into opportunities to improve their political position. They are plainly not interested in solving these problems for the benefit of all. They are plainly interested in using them to gain more power for themselves.</p>
<p>In every case, government is a tool to be used to the regime&#8217;s political advantage. It is a profit center. So is the entire country for that matter, something to be milked in as many ways possible.</p>
<p>As such, Bush plays a very important role &#8211; he&#8217;s the PR guy who placates the rubes. Despite his upper class origins, he has managed to skillfully affect a lower class vibe that attracts lots of under-achievers like himself. You could have a beer with this guy. As such, he&#8217;s a very important player in the right&#8217;s takeover of this country. He&#8217;s just the front guy, he&#8217;s not the one who&#8217;s really calling the shots, in many cases. Others, like Cheney or Rove, with Junior&#8217;s blessing, create the context, or the situations that Junior finds himself in, performing in front of the public.</p>
<p>Actions speak louder than words. Turn down the volume on Bush and see what his regime is really doing.</p>
<p>&#8211; </p>
<p>I hope you don&#8217;t mind me going a little OT.</p>
<p>I had a dream last night, where I was speaking with George Bush. He was very open, friendly, and candid with me, and I felt disarmed and drawn into his circle of acquaintanceship. I was mostly listening in the dream, and not challenging him on anything political, both because he disarmed me, and because it was evident in the dream that he was insane.</p>
<p>In the dream, he spoke about how he never liked &#8220;El Shaddai&#8221; or something similar &#8211; Bush mangled the phrase, and it was to him an abbreviation for a nonsensical saying, which he spelled out to me, but I don&#8217;t remember. In my waking life, I know thise phrase to be a synonym for God, particularly God the Father. In the dream Bush went on to say that he wanted to &#8220;blow up the sky&#8221;, meaning climb into an F-16 or other jet and start blowing things up.</p>
<p>The rest of the dream involved me finding others in the military or government to somehow stop this guy. What was interesting is that nobody needed convincing that the man was insane and needed to be stopped. It was just a question of how.</p>
<p>Lots of Oedipal themes here, and what was so real to me was Bush&#8217;s utter childishness and the completely open way he revealed his childishness. It was like conversing with a six year old who happened to be at the head of the most powerful nation on earth.</p>
<p>I hope this was at least entertaining, to me it was also revealing. Thanks for indulging me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/08/28/image-and-action/comment-page-1/#comment-31976</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=978#comment-31976</guid>
		<description>I am all over the blogosphere, like any good poster, and I must say that maha is hands down the best at shining the light of truth on the vile, wiggling AssClowns who &#039;run&#039; this nation. In a society of intelligent active citizens Bush and Cheney et. al. would now be resting comfortably in jail cells...if not their graves.

These &#039;leaders&#039; and their followers are a pack of deranged psychopths who have done and are doing fearful damage to our nation and society while most Americans doze in an alchoholic stupor in front of the TV.

Thankfully, maha is not one of those.

Keep hammerin&#039;&#039; away. The people are starting to listen.

And yeah, I think Losermann, Emmanuel, Schumer and The Boxer Short are scum too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all over the blogosphere, like any good poster, and I must say that maha is hands down the best at shining the light of truth on the vile, wiggling AssClowns who &#8216;run&#8217; this nation. In a society of intelligent active citizens Bush and Cheney et. al. would now be resting comfortably in jail cells&#8230;if not their graves.</p>
<p>These &#8216;leaders&#8217; and their followers are a pack of deranged psychopths who have done and are doing fearful damage to our nation and society while most Americans doze in an alchoholic stupor in front of the TV.</p>
<p>Thankfully, maha is not one of those.</p>
<p>Keep hammerin&#8221; away. The people are starting to listen.</p>
<p>And yeah, I think Losermann, Emmanuel, Schumer and The Boxer Short are scum too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
