<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Happy Talk</title>
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/08/happy-talk/</link>
	<description>Exposing the ugly truths about the Bush Administration.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: AnnieCat</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/08/happy-talk/#comment-37181</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/08/happy-talk/#comment-37181</guid>
					<description>Maybe Condi's shopping for shoes.  Has anyone checked the Jimmy Choo or Manolo Blahnik boutiques?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maybe Condi&#8217;s shopping for shoes.  Has anyone checked the Jimmy Choo or Manolo Blahnik boutiques?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Mahablog &#187; Bombing</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/08/happy-talk/#comment-37156</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 13:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/08/happy-talk/#comment-37156</guid>
					<description>[...] Yesterday I dug up a four-year-old news story in which Condi Rice told Wolf Blitzer that the Bush Administration knew just how to handle Ki Jong Il; it was Saddam Hussein people should be worried about.  Rice said Iraq’s history shows the Baghdad regime is harder to contain than North Korea. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] Yesterday I dug up a four-year-old news story in which Condi Rice told Wolf Blitzer that the Bush Administration knew just how to handle Ki Jong Il; it was Saddam Hussein people should be worried about.  Rice said Iraq’s history shows the Baghdad regime is harder to contain than North Korea. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CMc</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/08/happy-talk/#comment-37088</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/08/happy-talk/#comment-37088</guid>
					<description>Speaking of Eisenhower, he is also the Republican who said/wrote the following:  &quot;Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are...a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid.&quot;

Smart man.  Hope he was correct.

How sad it is to remember that Republican Party was once the party of Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, and Ike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Speaking of Eisenhower, he is also the Republican who said/wrote the following:  &#8220;Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are&#8230;a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Smart man.  Hope he was correct.</p>
	<p>How sad it is to remember that Republican Party was once the party of Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, and Ike.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: A. Citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/08/happy-talk/#comment-37081</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/08/happy-talk/#comment-37081</guid>
					<description>Yeah, it's all Clinton's fault that Madame Supertanker is a clueless idiot.

Say...where's The Idiot these days. Haven't heard much from him lately either. ' Course what is he gonna say about Foley and the rapidly disintegrating EyeRack disaster?

Oh, yeah he was with Poppy and one of his ugly sisters christening a new nuclear carrier.

Do you suppose we could put wheels on that sucka and send it into Iraq to subdues the insurgents?

Well we now see what the ReFuck's plan to defend Mr. Foley's 'prankish' behavior will be: It's Pelosi's fault!

Bwaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhaaaaaaaa!

Dat's gonna fly with Fred Fundie and his wife.....oh, yeah!

Bring the elections on Mr. Idiot.

And then the Dems can start subpoenaing everybody and his dog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s all Clinton&#8217;s fault that Madame Supertanker is a clueless idiot.</p>
	<p>Say&#8230;where&#8217;s The Idiot these days. Haven&#8217;t heard much from him lately either. &#8216; Course what is he gonna say about Foley and the rapidly disintegrating EyeRack disaster?</p>
	<p>Oh, yeah he was with Poppy and one of his ugly sisters christening a new nuclear carrier.</p>
	<p>Do you suppose we could put wheels on that sucka and send it into Iraq to subdues the insurgents?</p>
	<p>Well we now see what the ReFuck&#8217;s plan to defend Mr. Foley&#8217;s &#8216;prankish&#8217; behavior will be: It&#8217;s Pelosi&#8217;s fault!</p>
	<p>Bwaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhaaaaaaaa!</p>
	<p>Dat&#8217;s gonna fly with Fred Fundie and his wife&#8230;..oh, yeah!</p>
	<p>Bring the elections on Mr. Idiot.</p>
	<p>And then the Dems can start subpoenaing everybody and his dog.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
