<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Hides Behind China&#8217;s Skirts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/20/bush-hides-behind-chinas-skirts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/20/bush-hides-behind-chinas-skirts/</link>
	<description>Making the World Safe for Liberalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:53:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: c u n d gulag</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/20/bush-hides-behind-chinas-skirts/comment-page-1/#comment-38924</link>
		<dc:creator>c u n d gulag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1121#comment-38924</guid>
		<description>Swami,
Bush?  Child psychology?  I&#039;m sorry to tell everyone, but that baby was born brain-dead...

RIP...  
Ooops, sorry, no peace....

Maha, 
We have to rely on China and other countries to handle our &quot;diplomacy&quot; because he can&#039;t!  He can&#039;t, because he&#039;s the &quot;DIP&quot; in the &#039;lomacy&#039; that&#039;s missing...

God, what I&#039;d give for a Preznit who ain&#039;t the &quot;Scarecrow,&quot; lookin&#039; for a brain...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swami,<br />
Bush?  Child psychology?  I&#8217;m sorry to tell everyone, but that baby was born brain-dead&#8230;</p>
<p>RIP&#8230;<br />
Ooops, sorry, no peace&#8230;.</p>
<p>Maha,<br />
We have to rely on China and other countries to handle our &#8220;diplomacy&#8221; because he can&#8217;t!  He can&#8217;t, because he&#8217;s the &#8220;DIP&#8221; in the &#8216;lomacy&#8217; that&#8217;s missing&#8230;</p>
<p>God, what I&#8217;d give for a Preznit who ain&#8217;t the &#8220;Scarecrow,&#8221; lookin&#8217; for a brain&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swami</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/20/bush-hides-behind-chinas-skirts/comment-page-1/#comment-38862</link>
		<dc:creator>Swami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1121#comment-38862</guid>
		<description>When you&#039;re running down my war time President, you&#039;re walking on the fightin&#039; side of me...

Who do I go to see to get my certificate?..After 5 long years of carefully studying Bush, surely I must qualify for a degree in child psychology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you&#8217;re running down my war time President, you&#8217;re walking on the fightin&#8217; side of me&#8230;</p>
<p>Who do I go to see to get my certificate?..After 5 long years of carefully studying Bush, surely I must qualify for a degree in child psychology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/20/bush-hides-behind-chinas-skirts/comment-page-1/#comment-38739</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 04:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1121#comment-38739</guid>
		<description>Thanks fir th&#039; link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks fir th&#8217; link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/20/bush-hides-behind-chinas-skirts/comment-page-1/#comment-38712</link>
		<dc:creator>maha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1121#comment-38712</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“We want to nuke you” has always been our message to NKorea. The only difference is we think Bush will. I suspect Kim does too.&lt;/i&gt;

Hmm, I don&#039;t think he will, and I suspect Kim Jong Il doesn&#039;t think he will, either. That was the point of the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“We want to nuke you” has always been our message to NKorea. The only difference is we think Bush will. I suspect Kim does too.</i></p>
<p>Hmm, I don&#8217;t think he will, and I suspect Kim Jong Il doesn&#8217;t think he will, either. That was the point of the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the bewilderness</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/20/bush-hides-behind-chinas-skirts/comment-page-1/#comment-38698</link>
		<dc:creator>the bewilderness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1121#comment-38698</guid>
		<description>In 1950 Truman assured NKorea that we were willing to nuke them.  Eisenhower was next to reassure NKorea that we were willing to nuke them, and even place warheads on the border.  
Carter took away the nuclear warheads but made it clear that he was keeping them handy.
&quot;We want to nuke you&quot; has always been our message to NKorea.  The only difference is we think Bush will.   I suspect Kim does too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1950 Truman assured NKorea that we were willing to nuke them.  Eisenhower was next to reassure NKorea that we were willing to nuke them, and even place warheads on the border.<br />
Carter took away the nuclear warheads but made it clear that he was keeping them handy.<br />
&#8220;We want to nuke you&#8221; has always been our message to NKorea.  The only difference is we think Bush will.   I suspect Kim does too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paradoctor</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/20/bush-hides-behind-chinas-skirts/comment-page-1/#comment-38675</link>
		<dc:creator>paradoctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1121#comment-38675</guid>
		<description>Gradually China is amassing money, industry, power and now influence. It is they who will get the credit for bringing Kim to heel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gradually China is amassing money, industry, power and now influence. It is they who will get the credit for bringing Kim to heel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/20/bush-hides-behind-chinas-skirts/comment-page-1/#comment-38656</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1121#comment-38656</guid>
		<description>In the end, all bullies are wimps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end, all bullies are wimps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/20/bush-hides-behind-chinas-skirts/comment-page-1/#comment-38655</link>
		<dc:creator>maha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1121#comment-38655</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Are you seriously arguing that Bush is WRONG to do nothing? That instead of macho-posturing, he should ACTUALLY launch a thermo-nuclear war?&lt;/i&gt;

No, I explicitly said otherwise. 

&lt;i&gt;Because what the hell is the alternative to either Bi-lateral or multi-lateral talks? WAR!&lt;/i&gt;

Where did I say I was against talks? Learn to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Are you seriously arguing that Bush is WRONG to do nothing? That instead of macho-posturing, he should ACTUALLY launch a thermo-nuclear war?</i></p>
<p>No, I explicitly said otherwise. </p>
<p><i>Because what the hell is the alternative to either Bi-lateral or multi-lateral talks? WAR!</i></p>
<p>Where did I say I was against talks? Learn to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cugel</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/20/bush-hides-behind-chinas-skirts/comment-page-1/#comment-38654</link>
		<dc:creator>Cugel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1121#comment-38654</guid>
		<description>Are you seriously arguing that Bush is WRONG to do nothing? That instead of macho-posturing, he should ACTUALLY launch a thermo-nuclear war? 

Because what the hell is the alternative to either Bi-lateral or multi-lateral talks? WAR!

And a war with Kim instantly turns much of east Asia into radioactive scrap, possibly including Japan. The last thing Bush should be criticized over is NOT doing his usual bat-shit insane &quot;unilateral action.&quot; He&#039;s been told by his handlers that there&#039;s really not much he can do, so &quot;talk loudly and carry a small twig&quot; is about it.

Of course he should agree to bi-lateral talks with N. Korea, and agree to forego all the belligerent threats, but this is Bush we&#039;re talking about. Personally, I&#039;m happy if he goes another day WITHOUT playing tag with the nuclear football. His being a putz on this is GOOD. 

Yes, the entire crisis is his fault since he canceled Clinton&#039;s policy back in 2001, but what isn&#039;t his fault these days?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you seriously arguing that Bush is WRONG to do nothing? That instead of macho-posturing, he should ACTUALLY launch a thermo-nuclear war? </p>
<p>Because what the hell is the alternative to either Bi-lateral or multi-lateral talks? WAR!</p>
<p>And a war with Kim instantly turns much of east Asia into radioactive scrap, possibly including Japan. The last thing Bush should be criticized over is NOT doing his usual bat-shit insane &#8220;unilateral action.&#8221; He&#8217;s been told by his handlers that there&#8217;s really not much he can do, so &#8220;talk loudly and carry a small twig&#8221; is about it.</p>
<p>Of course he should agree to bi-lateral talks with N. Korea, and agree to forego all the belligerent threats, but this is Bush we&#8217;re talking about. Personally, I&#8217;m happy if he goes another day WITHOUT playing tag with the nuclear football. His being a putz on this is GOOD. </p>
<p>Yes, the entire crisis is his fault since he canceled Clinton&#8217;s policy back in 2001, but what isn&#8217;t his fault these days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erinyes</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/10/20/bush-hides-behind-chinas-skirts/comment-page-1/#comment-38649</link>
		<dc:creator>erinyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1121#comment-38649</guid>
		<description>I think Bush is throwing the ball into the courts of China and Saudi because his credibility is zilch in Asia and the M.E. This may sound racist and sexist, but the reality is that those old boys in Asia and the M.E. don&#039;t want to deal with a black chick ( Condi )Women in that part of the world don&#039;t boss the men around (at least not in public), and &quot;Bonkers&quot; Bolton won&#039;t get anywhere with his threats ( somebody get the &quot;Queer Eye&quot; boys to do a make over on him, PLEASE, he looks like a Dr Suess character,couldn&#039;t get a job at Disney World with that look!)
 Now about that G-8 meeting, if Our President acts that silly without being plastered, this is very bad. His table manners, speaking ability, and intellect are not up to par with the rest of the G-8 leaders.This is embarassing.
 Hope you&#039;re feeling better Maha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Bush is throwing the ball into the courts of China and Saudi because his credibility is zilch in Asia and the M.E. This may sound racist and sexist, but the reality is that those old boys in Asia and the M.E. don&#8217;t want to deal with a black chick ( Condi )Women in that part of the world don&#8217;t boss the men around (at least not in public), and &#8220;Bonkers&#8221; Bolton won&#8217;t get anywhere with his threats ( somebody get the &#8220;Queer Eye&#8221; boys to do a make over on him, PLEASE, he looks like a Dr Suess character,couldn&#8217;t get a job at Disney World with that look!)<br />
 Now about that G-8 meeting, if Our President acts that silly without being plastered, this is very bad. His table manners, speaking ability, and intellect are not up to par with the rest of the G-8 leaders.This is embarassing.<br />
 Hope you&#8217;re feeling better Maha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
