<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s Your Daddy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mahablog.com/2006/11/13/whos-your-daddy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/11/13/whos-your-daddy/</link>
	<description>Making the World Safe for Liberalism</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Mahablog &#187; The Power of (Right Wing) Myth</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/11/13/whos-your-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-274619</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mahablog &#187; The Power of (Right Wing) Myth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1190#comment-274619</guid>
		<description>[...] In fact, the mythical Carter/Reagan dichotomy &#8212; Carter as murky, depressed, weak, passive and Reagan as clear, sunny, strong, and active &#8212; is exactly the yin/yang dichotomy. I could write a whole &#8216;nother post on gender politics and the many associations of liberalism with femininity and conservatism with masculinity, never mind reality. In fact, I did write that post awhile back. But for now, I just want to point to this as another layer of the right-wing subconscious and postulate that men with gender insecurity are more likely to lean right than left. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In fact, the mythical Carter/Reagan dichotomy &#8212; Carter as murky, depressed, weak, passive and Reagan as clear, sunny, strong, and active &#8212; is exactly the yin/yang dichotomy. I could write a whole &#8216;nother post on gender politics and the many associations of liberalism with femininity and conservatism with masculinity, never mind reality. In fact, I did write that post awhile back. But for now, I just want to point to this as another layer of the right-wing subconscious and postulate that men with gender insecurity are more likely to lean right than left. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucidity</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/11/13/whos-your-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-45796</link>
		<dc:creator>lucidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1190#comment-45796</guid>
		<description>Maha,

I first read about Lakoff's mommy-party/daddy-party theory on your blog and, like you, I thought it really missed the point on liberalism (although the Strict Father metaphor seems to be spot-on for conservatism). I did a diary at Daily Kos a couple months ago that explored the connection between politics and evolutionary psychology and tried to come up with a better metaphor for the liberal worldview. It's a five-part diary called "Monkey Morality," and I'd love to hear your and your readers' comments on it:

&lt;a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/9/5/121112/8217" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/9/5/121112/8217&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maha,</p>
<p>I first read about Lakoff&#8217;s mommy-party/daddy-party theory on your blog and, like you, I thought it really missed the point on liberalism (although the Strict Father metaphor seems to be spot-on for conservatism). I did a diary at Daily Kos a couple months ago that explored the connection between politics and evolutionary psychology and tried to come up with a better metaphor for the liberal worldview. It&#8217;s a five-part diary called &#8220;Monkey Morality,&#8221; and I&#8217;d love to hear your and your readers&#8217; comments on it:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/9/5/121112/8217" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/9/5/121112/8217</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/11/13/whos-your-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-45515</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1190#comment-45515</guid>
		<description>“Someday I should write a post arguing that male righties have a fetish about manliness because they are so unsure of their own …”

Jesus's General has been doing that for years.

Seriously - no need. It's completely obvious to anyone except to those who will never, ever admit it. I laughed long and loud when Commander Codpiece landed on the aircraft carrier - but that was nothing compared to watching Ollie North waxing eloquent on Tweety's "Hardball" (I think it was) about the commanding figure that Bush cut at that moment, and how he had just assured the vote of every female in the US (and, of course, his own vote, too).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Someday I should write a post arguing that male righties have a fetish about manliness because they are so unsure of their own …”</p>
<p>Jesus&#8217;s General has been doing that for years.</p>
<p>Seriously - no need. It&#8217;s completely obvious to anyone except to those who will never, ever admit it. I laughed long and loud when Commander Codpiece landed on the aircraft carrier - but that was nothing compared to watching Ollie North waxing eloquent on Tweety&#8217;s &#8220;Hardball&#8221; (I think it was) about the commanding figure that Bush cut at that moment, and how he had just assured the vote of every female in the US (and, of course, his own vote, too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/11/13/whos-your-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-45513</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1190#comment-45513</guid>
		<description>"... male righties have a fetish about manliness because they are so unsure of their own".  Bingo, you have nailed the whole problem right there.  Most personality flaws are in fact overcompensations for feelings of inadequacy.  Another example: when Bush always says "I understand that...." or "He understands, as I do, that...", he's overcompensating for all the times as a boy that he undoubtedly DIDN'T understand, and/or his mommy told him so.  Trying to prove he understands, but in fact proving the opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; male righties have a fetish about manliness because they are so unsure of their own&#8221;.  Bingo, you have nailed the whole problem right there.  Most personality flaws are in fact overcompensations for feelings of inadequacy.  Another example: when Bush always says &#8220;I understand that&#8230;.&#8221; or &#8220;He understands, as I do, that&#8230;&#8221;, he&#8217;s overcompensating for all the times as a boy that he undoubtedly DIDN&#8217;T understand, and/or his mommy told him so.  Trying to prove he understands, but in fact proving the opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/11/13/whos-your-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-45328</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 01:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1190#comment-45328</guid>
		<description>If we all had a sense if humor (btw, did you see the SNL skit parody of Nancy P - hilarious) Nancy P could suggest that the suffrage movement had reached the point that she is going to ask for judicial intervention according to affirmative action and deny men the right to vote or run for office for a period of time equal to the span that women were excluded. Sadly, such a suggestion made in jest, would be twisted, spun and manipulated. And we all need a laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we all had a sense if humor (btw, did you see the SNL skit parody of Nancy P - hilarious) Nancy P could suggest that the suffrage movement had reached the point that she is going to ask for judicial intervention according to affirmative action and deny men the right to vote or run for office for a period of time equal to the span that women were excluded. Sadly, such a suggestion made in jest, would be twisted, spun and manipulated. And we all need a laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ironranger</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/11/13/whos-your-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-45294</link>
		<dc:creator>ironranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1190#comment-45294</guid>
		<description>Desperation, desperation, desperation. They're even bringing out their yearly specialty ahead of schedule, the liberal war on shopping, er Christmas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Desperation, desperation, desperation. They&#8217;re even bringing out their yearly specialty ahead of schedule, the liberal war on shopping, er Christmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/11/13/whos-your-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-45280</link>
		<dc:creator>maha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1190#comment-45280</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I think you just did.&lt;/i&gt;

No, that was just the premise. The argument is much longer. I made some of the argument &lt;a href="http://www.mahablog.com/oldsite/id27.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;awhile back&lt;/a&gt;, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I think you just did.</i></p>
<p>No, that was just the premise. The argument is much longer. I made some of the argument <a href="http://www.mahablog.com/oldsite/id27.html" rel="nofollow">awhile back</a>, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swami</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/11/13/whos-your-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-45272</link>
		<dc:creator>Swami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1190#comment-45272</guid>
		<description>Pelosi has got it.. she's able to project an internal power and still retain the feminine quailties of softness and reason. Not many women in politics can do that.. Take a look at that cold.hard, and bitter bitch Mean Jean to see what I mean. Could ya cuddle with something like that,guys?.. I didn't think so!.. not unless you're into necrophilia.

My self image psychology growing up was build on the model of a macho man and looking back I can see how hollow it was and is. And if you don't like that..I'll kick your ass..you got that, Pal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pelosi has got it.. she&#8217;s able to project an internal power and still retain the feminine quailties of softness and reason. Not many women in politics can do that.. Take a look at that cold.hard, and bitter bitch Mean Jean to see what I mean. Could ya cuddle with something like that,guys?.. I didn&#8217;t think so!.. not unless you&#8217;re into necrophilia.</p>
<p>My self image psychology growing up was build on the model of a macho man and looking back I can see how hollow it was and is. And if you don&#8217;t like that..I&#8217;ll kick your ass..you got that, Pal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/11/13/whos-your-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-45264</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1190#comment-45264</guid>
		<description>"Someday I should write a post arguing that male righties have a fetish about manliness because they are so unsure of their own ..."

I think you just did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Someday I should write a post arguing that male righties have a fetish about manliness because they are so unsure of their own &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you just did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hilton</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2006/11/13/whos-your-daddy/comment-page-1/#comment-45263</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1190#comment-45263</guid>
		<description>This framing is particularly ironic in light of &lt;i&gt;Bush's daddy&lt;/i&gt; coming back to try to rescue him from his fuckups (that's the Time cover, anyway).  

Maybe instead of 'daddy party' vs. 'mommy party', we should frame it as 'parent party' vs. 'angry irresponsible drug-addled adolescent party'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This framing is particularly ironic in light of <i>Bush&#8217;s daddy</i> coming back to try to rescue him from his fuckups (that&#8217;s the Time cover, anyway).  </p>
<p>Maybe instead of &#8216;daddy party&#8217; vs. &#8216;mommy party&#8217;, we should frame it as &#8216;parent party&#8217; vs. &#8216;angry irresponsible drug-addled adolescent party&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
