November 30, 2006

Iraq’d

Filed under: Bush Administration, Iraq War, Democratic Party — maha @ 9:49 pm

I didn’t get a chance to write what I was going to write about Iraq today, but then Dan Froomkin wrote it for me.

I bet you’ll also like this article by Sidney Blumenthal.

Spotlight

4 Comments »

  1. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15976601/

    More lives, more money….and a permanent military presence in Iraq. Everything the boy king wanted. I’m just glad my loved ones aren’t dying for the neocon adventure. I guess the newly elected Democrats will be tripping over their feet to embrace the consensus of compliance.

    Comment by Swami — November 30, 2006 @ 10:52 pm

  2. Maha,

    Check out George Will`s diatribe in the same edition of the Washington Post against newly elected Sen. Webb.

    Comment by A Canadian Reader — November 30, 2006 @ 11:12 pm

  3. Canadian reader — I saw it. Stunning. I guess Will’s being the pompous ass’s pompous ass makes him appreciative of pompous asshole-ity in others.

    Comment by maha — November 30, 2006 @ 11:36 pm

  4. I think people are underestimating Baker’s power. His charter is not to “fix” Iraq - it’s to rescue the GOP from Bush. I suspect he has the backing of all the non-necocon, non-talibangelicals in the Republican party (and a lot of Lee Hamilton Dems, too). I bet they can pull a lot of strings inside and outside the administration.

    Between that and the power of events (militias preparing for pitched battles; W being slighted and ignored even by those beholden to him for their jobs…), things could get very interesting very quickly.

    —————-
    As for Will’s tirade: he was dissing Bush pretty badly a few weeks ago. But Webb’s an economic populist, making him (to Will) an evil parasite of the very worst kind.

    Comment by Gordon — December 1, 2006 @ 8:50 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Protected by WP-Hashcash.