<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pentagon Goes Fishin&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mahablog.com/2007/01/14/the-pentagon-goes-fishin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/01/14/the-pentagon-goes-fishin/</link>
	<description>Making the World Safe for Liberalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:08:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Swami</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/01/14/the-pentagon-goes-fishin/comment-page-1/#comment-70048</link>
		<dc:creator>Swami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 04:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1368#comment-70048</guid>
		<description>Erinyes,  It would be nice if it were true and doable..One positive sign in the air is that Cheney came out of his cave today...that&#039;s an indication that Bush is feeling the heat. Cheney only comes out to remind the public that him and Bush are untouchable, and that in order to get to him or Bush we have to betray the sacrifices of the troops in the field. And of course, nothing could make Osama ( remember him?) happier then our questioning of the wisdom of our invasion of Iraq. We don&#039;t want to be Osama&#039;s stooges,do we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erinyes,  It would be nice if it were true and doable..One positive sign in the air is that Cheney came out of his cave today&#8230;that&#8217;s an indication that Bush is feeling the heat. Cheney only comes out to remind the public that him and Bush are untouchable, and that in order to get to him or Bush we have to betray the sacrifices of the troops in the field. And of course, nothing could make Osama ( remember him?) happier then our questioning of the wisdom of our invasion of Iraq. We don&#8217;t want to be Osama&#8217;s stooges,do we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erinyes</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/01/14/the-pentagon-goes-fishin/comment-page-1/#comment-70025</link>
		<dc:creator>erinyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 01:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1368#comment-70025</guid>
		<description>Well, here&#039;s a little good news, &#039;hope it&#039;s true!
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/4728</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, here&#8217;s a little good news, &#8216;hope it&#8217;s true!<br />
<a href="http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/4728" rel="nofollow">http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/4728</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/01/14/the-pentagon-goes-fishin/comment-page-1/#comment-69771</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 22:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1368#comment-69771</guid>
		<description>commentors? co-mentors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>commentors? co-mentors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sachem515</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/01/14/the-pentagon-goes-fishin/comment-page-1/#comment-69639</link>
		<dc:creator>sachem515</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1368#comment-69639</guid>
		<description>To #10 I say:

4 out of 5 blog commentors agree --&gt; typos go away with a preview pane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To #10 I say:</p>
<p>4 out of 5 blog commentors agree &#8211;&gt; typos go away with a preview pane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joanr16</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/01/14/the-pentagon-goes-fishin/comment-page-1/#comment-69638</link>
		<dc:creator>joanr16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1368#comment-69638</guid>
		<description>c u n d gulag, you completely nailed my opinion of Libertarianism.  Could I ask one teensy housekeeping favor, though?  At the risk of sounding like that pathetic &lt;i&gt;Eats, Shoots and Leaves&lt;/i&gt; woman, apostrophized plurals (e.g. monkey&#039;s and kid&#039;s, for monkeys and kids) are like nails on a blackboard to my reading brain.

Sorry.  We all have our weirdness; I guess that&#039;s mine.  Otherwise, very cool comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>c u n d gulag, you completely nailed my opinion of Libertarianism.  Could I ask one teensy housekeeping favor, though?  At the risk of sounding like that pathetic <i>Eats, Shoots and Leaves</i> woman, apostrophized plurals (e.g. monkey&#8217;s and kid&#8217;s, for monkeys and kids) are like nails on a blackboard to my reading brain.</p>
<p>Sorry.  We all have our weirdness; I guess that&#8217;s mine.  Otherwise, very cool comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sachem515</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/01/14/the-pentagon-goes-fishin/comment-page-1/#comment-69636</link>
		<dc:creator>sachem515</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1368#comment-69636</guid>
		<description>biggerbox suffers from pre 9/11 thinking.  Records aren&#039;t needed, political will is.

Please read Glenn Greenwald&#039;s post

 The collapse of the Bush presidency poses risks

http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2007/01/collapse-of-bush-presidency-poses.html

This is the closing paragraph:

The most dangerous George Bush is one who feels weak, powerless and under attack. Those perceptions are intolerable for him and I doubt there are many limits, if there are any, on what he would be willing to do in order to restore a feeling of power and to rid himself of the sensations of his own weakness and defeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>biggerbox suffers from pre 9/11 thinking.  Records aren&#8217;t needed, political will is.</p>
<p>Please read Glenn Greenwald&#8217;s post</p>
<p> The collapse of the Bush presidency poses risks</p>
<p><a href="http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2007/01/collapse-of-bush-presidency-poses.html" rel="nofollow">http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2007/01/collapse-of-bush-presidency-poses.html</a></p>
<p>This is the closing paragraph:</p>
<p>The most dangerous George Bush is one who feels weak, powerless and under attack. Those perceptions are intolerable for him and I doubt there are many limits, if there are any, on what he would be willing to do in order to restore a feeling of power and to rid himself of the sensations of his own weakness and defeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biggerbox</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/01/14/the-pentagon-goes-fishin/comment-page-1/#comment-69635</link>
		<dc:creator>biggerbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1368#comment-69635</guid>
		<description>Gee, if only there were a way that military investigators with legitimate suspicions about people could get access to records, perhaps something where they would go to a special third-party who was supposed to be impartial ... they could show the reasons for their concern to this third-party who could &#039;judge&#039; whether to give them permission ... to decide if the concerns were &#039;warranted&#039;. 

Of course, such a system would probably only work well for hundreds of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, if only there were a way that military investigators with legitimate suspicions about people could get access to records, perhaps something where they would go to a special third-party who was supposed to be impartial &#8230; they could show the reasons for their concern to this third-party who could &#8216;judge&#8217; whether to give them permission &#8230; to decide if the concerns were &#8216;warranted&#8217;. </p>
<p>Of course, such a system would probably only work well for hundreds of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sachem515</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/01/14/the-pentagon-goes-fishin/comment-page-1/#comment-69631</link>
		<dc:creator>sachem515</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1368#comment-69631</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a political solution to our military problem.

Dick Cheney must go.

The investigations are about to begin. Libby&#039;s gonna get Fitz&#039;d.  The congressional subpoenas will be issued.  The weariness over constitutional erosion is palable. 

So in advance of the predictable claims of executive privilege, I believe the call for his resignation must begin to rise.  Political will for the necessary must begin to be accumulated.

It may seems a bit premature to some, but I expect it will resonate broadly as events unfold.  There is no unitary executive.  Not in this country.  Sorry about yer luck Dick.

&quot;The object is a larger one, and the original overarching goal of this administration: expanding executive power, for its own sake&quot;.

http://www.slate.com/id/2157493/

Since I expect no reader here to disagree with the above quote, then let&#039;s ask ourselves why we feel obliged to put up with this any longer.   

Congress is suffering fom a type of learned helplessness.  Public outcry from most quarters must create intestinal fortitude.

http://www.democrats.com/Congressional-Dems-Suffering-From-Battered-Spouse-Syndrome

As I have said before, time is exceedingly of the essence.  Do we really want Dick driving the bus at the next geopolitical crossroad?

The framers put the impeachment clauses in the constitution for scenarios like this.  Exercising our rights is an imperative.  No signing statement on this one.  

Once this is all over, we will look back and wish Dick had spared us the inevitable vitriol.  Men in multi-thousand dollar suits will try and tell America that this is complicated.  It&#039;s not. He&#039;s a bad man.  He&#039;s an enemy of the republic. He should&#039;ve been cuffed years ago. 

Join the call for his resignation today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a political solution to our military problem.</p>
<p>Dick Cheney must go.</p>
<p>The investigations are about to begin. Libby&#8217;s gonna get Fitz&#8217;d.  The congressional subpoenas will be issued.  The weariness over constitutional erosion is palable. </p>
<p>So in advance of the predictable claims of executive privilege, I believe the call for his resignation must begin to rise.  Political will for the necessary must begin to be accumulated.</p>
<p>It may seems a bit premature to some, but I expect it will resonate broadly as events unfold.  There is no unitary executive.  Not in this country.  Sorry about yer luck Dick.</p>
<p>&#8220;The object is a larger one, and the original overarching goal of this administration: expanding executive power, for its own sake&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2157493/" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/id/2157493/</a></p>
<p>Since I expect no reader here to disagree with the above quote, then let&#8217;s ask ourselves why we feel obliged to put up with this any longer.   </p>
<p>Congress is suffering fom a type of learned helplessness.  Public outcry from most quarters must create intestinal fortitude.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.democrats.com/Congressional-Dems-Suffering-From-Battered-Spouse-Syndrome" rel="nofollow">http://www.democrats.com/Congressional-Dems-Suffering-From-Battered-Spouse-Syndrome</a></p>
<p>As I have said before, time is exceedingly of the essence.  Do we really want Dick driving the bus at the next geopolitical crossroad?</p>
<p>The framers put the impeachment clauses in the constitution for scenarios like this.  Exercising our rights is an imperative.  No signing statement on this one.  </p>
<p>Once this is all over, we will look back and wish Dick had spared us the inevitable vitriol.  Men in multi-thousand dollar suits will try and tell America that this is complicated.  It&#8217;s not. He&#8217;s a bad man.  He&#8217;s an enemy of the republic. He should&#8217;ve been cuffed years ago. </p>
<p>Join the call for his resignation today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/01/14/the-pentagon-goes-fishin/comment-page-1/#comment-69627</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1368#comment-69627</guid>
		<description>If this were being written about a President Hillary doing this, you can bet the farm that the right wingers would be in a snit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this were being written about a President Hillary doing this, you can bet the farm that the right wingers would be in a snit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erinyes</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/01/14/the-pentagon-goes-fishin/comment-page-1/#comment-69578</link>
		<dc:creator>erinyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1368#comment-69578</guid>
		<description>Well, Commander Codpiece said (and I quote) &quot;When we&#039;re talkin&#039;
about war, we&#039;re really talkin&#039; &#039;bout peace&quot;.( Orwell rolls in his grave) My biggest concern is that some zealots will be appointed positions of power (as if they haven&#039;t already), and we&#039;ll have a regular inquisition.
 Freedom is on the march! Wave good-bye........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Commander Codpiece said (and I quote) &#8220;When we&#8217;re talkin&#8217;<br />
about war, we&#8217;re really talkin&#8217; &#8217;bout peace&#8221;.( Orwell rolls in his grave) My biggest concern is that some zealots will be appointed positions of power (as if they haven&#8217;t already), and we&#8217;ll have a regular inquisition.<br />
 Freedom is on the march! Wave good-bye&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
