<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the Strife of Truth With Falsehood</title>
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/</link>
	<description>Exposing the ugly truths about the Bush Administration.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: felicity smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-114487</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-114487</guid>
					<description>The Republicans also owe Abe Lincoln an apology.  Even recently on the floor of the House those who supported Bush's surge invoked Lincoln to taint their opponents with the charge of treason.  Wartime Congressmen who &quot;damage morale and undermine the military&quot; should be &quot;exiled and hanged&quot;  - supposedly said by Lincoln has been floating around in conservative circles for years.  According to Glenn Greenwald the &quot;quote&quot; is a complete fabrication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The Republicans also owe Abe Lincoln an apology.  Even recently on the floor of the House those who supported Bush&#8217;s surge invoked Lincoln to taint their opponents with the charge of treason.  Wartime Congressmen who &#8220;damage morale and undermine the military&#8221; should be &#8220;exiled and hanged&#8221;  - supposedly said by Lincoln has been floating around in conservative circles for years.  According to Glenn Greenwald the &#8220;quote&#8221; is a complete fabrication.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PurpleGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-111180</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-111180</guid>
					<description>C&amp;#38;L has the Olbermann's special comment on Ms. Rice (video and transcript).  Olbermann was great.  She has no integrity left, whatever amount of it she may have started with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>C&amp;L has the Olbermann&#8217;s special comment on Ms. Rice (video and transcript).  Olbermann was great.  She has no integrity left, whatever amount of it she may have started with.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: justme</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-110799</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-110799</guid>
					<description>You know, it dawns on me how easy it would be for bush to get these folks to line up for the train and it scares the hell out of me.I have always said that those who stand for nothing will fall for anything...I didn't need any help proving my point, but thanks anyway carol.
     And FSHK is so right,Olbermanns comments last night were OUTSTANDING....too bad he is the only one in the main stream media who bothered to point out the many levels of wrong in condis comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You know, it dawns on me how easy it would be for bush to get these folks to line up for the train and it scares the hell out of me.I have always said that those who stand for nothing will fall for anything&#8230;I didn&#8217;t need any help proving my point, but thanks anyway carol.<br />
     And FSHK is so right,Olbermanns comments last night were OUTSTANDING&#8230;.too bad he is the only one in the main stream media who bothered to point out the many levels of wrong in condis comments.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: fshk</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-110726</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-110726</guid>
					<description>Speaking of mangling history, did you see Keith Olbermann's special comment about Condi Rice last night? By now it's probably up on YouTube if you didn't. Good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Speaking of mangling history, did you see Keith Olbermann&#8217;s special comment about Condi Rice last night? By now it&#8217;s probably up on YouTube if you didn&#8217;t. Good stuff.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: joanr16</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-110720</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-110720</guid>
					<description>Considering how often the Right misinterprets the Bible, Shakespeare, the signs of global warming, and (on a regular basis) maha's posts, I must say this doesn't surprise me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Considering how often the Right misinterprets the Bible, Shakespeare, the signs of global warming, and (on a regular basis) maha&#8217;s posts, I must say this doesn&#8217;t surprise me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: D.R. Marvel</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-110655</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-110655</guid>
					<description>Well...She uses three names...

 Sounds mighty &quot;secesh&quot; to me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well&#8230;She uses three names&#8230;</p>
	<p> Sounds mighty &#8220;secesh&#8221; to me&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-110432</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-110432</guid>
					<description>D.R. -- She doesn't say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>D.R. &#8212; She doesn&#8217;t say.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: D.R. Marvel</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-110428</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/27/in-the-strife-of-truth-with-falsehood/#comment-110428</guid>
					<description>Does she also side with the Confederacy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Does she also side with the Confederacy?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
