<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updates</title>
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/28/updates/</link>
	<description>Exposing the ugly truths about the Bush Administration.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: felicity smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/28/updates/#comment-121974</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/02/28/updates/#comment-121974</guid>
					<description>According to an article by Naomi Klein, Judge Cooke said,. &quot;It's not like Mr. Padilla was living in a box.  He was at a place.  Things happened to him at that place.&quot;  She has ordered prison employees to testify at the hearings on Padilla's mental state.  They will be asked how a man alleged to have engaged in elaborate antigovernment plots now acts, in the words of brig staff, &quot;like a piece of furniture.&quot;  The fact that he's now been declared competent to stand trial is very confusing.  

According to the article in The Nation the cruel methods US interrogators have used since 9/11 to &quot;break&quot; prisoners are finally being put on trial.  Sounds like in order to have a trial the judge had to declare him competent to stand trial otherwise what happened to him won't see the light of day.  Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>According to an article by Naomi Klein, Judge Cooke said,. &#8220;It&#8217;s not like Mr. Padilla was living in a box.  He was at a place.  Things happened to him at that place.&#8221;  She has ordered prison employees to testify at the hearings on Padilla&#8217;s mental state.  They will be asked how a man alleged to have engaged in elaborate antigovernment plots now acts, in the words of brig staff, &#8220;like a piece of furniture.&#8221;  The fact that he&#8217;s now been declared competent to stand trial is very confusing.  </p>
	<p>According to the article in The Nation the cruel methods US interrogators have used since 9/11 to &#8220;break&#8221; prisoners are finally being put on trial.  Sounds like in order to have a trial the judge had to declare him competent to stand trial otherwise what happened to him won&#8217;t see the light of day.  Am I missing something?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
