<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re Not Angry, Dammit</title>
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/</link>
	<description>Exposing the ugly truths about the Bush Administration.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187883</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187883</guid>
					<description>r4d20 -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/27/dont-watch-on-a-full-stomach/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;talk about projection&lt;/a&gt; --</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>r4d20 &#8212; <a href="http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/27/dont-watch-on-a-full-stomach/" rel="nofollow">talk about projection</a> &#8211;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: r4d20</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187808</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187808</guid>
					<description>The realization that, presently, &quot;anger&quot; dominates the right much more than the left was possibly the biggest factor in my alienation from the right.  I spent most of the Clinton years telling myself that the angry-right was just a small, ignorable, part of the Republican party, but after Bush and 9/11 it became increasingly hard to ignore.  I couldn't help notice that the &quot;angry left&quot; consisted of a tiny number of people and examples - I found myself reading the same examples over and over again with rarely a new addition - while the, at the same time, comments about liberals being an &quot;enemy within&quot; that needed to be &quot;dealt with&quot;, and other eliminationist rhetoric, we oozing from the right.  

I believe the source of the &quot;angry left&quot; meme is projection.  Their anger is matched only by their paranoia, and they &lt;i&gt; convince themselves that it's &quot;the left&quot; who hates them&lt;/i&gt; would just love to exterminate them all in Soviet-style camps.  Given this alternate reality, they can express their anger without considering themselves &quot;angry&quot; because their anger is justified by the even greater anger of their &quot;opponents&quot;.    At least, that is the impression I got towards the end of my &quot;tenure&quot; reading the &quot;rightwing&quot; sources (David Horowitz, LGF, Instapundit, Jeff Goldstein, etc...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The realization that, presently, &#8220;anger&#8221; dominates the right much more than the left was possibly the biggest factor in my alienation from the right.  I spent most of the Clinton years telling myself that the angry-right was just a small, ignorable, part of the Republican party, but after Bush and 9/11 it became increasingly hard to ignore.  I couldn&#8217;t help notice that the &#8220;angry left&#8221; consisted of a tiny number of people and examples - I found myself reading the same examples over and over again with rarely a new addition - while the, at the same time, comments about liberals being an &#8220;enemy within&#8221; that needed to be &#8220;dealt with&#8221;, and other eliminationist rhetoric, we oozing from the right.  </p>
	<p>I believe the source of the &#8220;angry left&#8221; meme is projection.  Their anger is matched only by their paranoia, and they <i> convince themselves that it&#8217;s &#8220;the left&#8221; who hates them</i> would just love to exterminate them all in Soviet-style camps.  Given this alternate reality, they can express their anger without considering themselves &#8220;angry&#8221; because their anger is justified by the even greater anger of their &#8220;opponents&#8221;.    At least, that is the impression I got towards the end of my &#8220;tenure&#8221; reading the &#8220;rightwing&#8221; sources (David Horowitz, LGF, Instapundit, Jeff Goldstein, etc&#8230;).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: wmr</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187731</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187731</guid>
					<description>Wood managed to write a book about the New Angri-Culture (Cute, eh? He's also a professor of rhetoric) without mentioning Newt Gingrich.  Partisan hack sounds right to me as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wood managed to write a book about the New Angri-Culture (Cute, eh? He&#8217;s also a professor of rhetoric) without mentioning Newt Gingrich.  Partisan hack sounds right to me as well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JABbering Stooge :: Paging Dr. Freud&#8230; :: March :: 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187656</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 06:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187656</guid>
					<description>[...] Granted, the latest bit of George Will prattle has been expertly dissected by people more eloquent than I already, but I thought I would point out something that has been missed in all the snarky commentary on the column - something that David Neiwert has a particular expertise in identifying and analyzing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] Granted, the latest bit of George Will prattle has been expertly dissected by people more eloquent than I already, but I thought I would point out something that has been missed in all the snarky commentary on the column - something that David Neiwert has a particular expertise in identifying and analyzing. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve from Canuckistan</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187447</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187447</guid>
					<description>It will be interesting to see what Mr. Will puts in his column when his beloved leader is finally unmasked as the nincompoop and moron (not to mention war criminal) that he is. I'm waiting for WAPO to hit the clueless trifecta with Will, Novak the lizzard and Fred Hiatt all up on the opinion page on the same day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It will be interesting to see what Mr. Will puts in his column when his beloved leader is finally unmasked as the nincompoop and moron (not to mention war criminal) that he is. I&#8217;m waiting for WAPO to hit the clueless trifecta with Will, Novak the lizzard and Fred Hiatt all up on the opinion page on the same day.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gaia sighs...</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187395</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187395</guid>
					<description>This sycophantic twit would do well to recall the honor paid to Rage by Thomas - particularly, in these, our Republic's dying days:
  
             Do not go gentle into that good night,
        Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
        Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

        Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
        Because their words had forked no lightning they
        Do not go gentle into that good night.

        Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
        Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
        Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

        Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
        And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
        Do not go gentle into that good night.

        Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
        Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
        Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

        And you, my father, there on the sad height,
        Curse, bless me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
        Do not go gentle into that good night.
        Rage, rage against the dying of the light. 
                          
                                                dylan thomas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This sycophantic twit would do well to recall the honor paid to Rage by Thomas - particularly, in these, our Republic&#8217;s dying days:</p>
	<p>             Do not go gentle into that good night,<br />
        Old age should burn and rave at close of day;<br />
        Rage, rage against the dying of the light.</p>
	<p>        Though wise men at their end know dark is right,<br />
        Because their words had forked no lightning they<br />
        Do not go gentle into that good night.</p>
	<p>        Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright<br />
        Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,<br />
        Rage, rage against the dying of the light.</p>
	<p>        Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,<br />
        And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,<br />
        Do not go gentle into that good night.</p>
	<p>        Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight<br />
        Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,<br />
        Rage, rage against the dying of the light.</p>
	<p>        And you, my father, there on the sad height,<br />
        Curse, bless me now with your fierce tears, I pray.<br />
        Do not go gentle into that good night.<br />
        Rage, rage against the dying of the light. </p>
	<p>                                                dylan thomas
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Avedon</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187373</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187373</guid>
					<description>Funny how these same news organizations thought anger was perfectly healthy when they were writing articles about how, boy, that Bill Clinton sure does generate anger.

But there was nothing crazy about &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; anger, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Funny how these same news organizations thought anger was perfectly healthy when they were writing articles about how, boy, that Bill Clinton sure does generate anger.</p>
	<p>But there was nothing crazy about <i>that</i> anger, eh?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: marijam</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187291</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187291</guid>
					<description>Hate speech and anger on the right is a very profitable marketing device that has made millions for Rush Limbaugh, et al.  For the left, it hasn't been a marketing ploy, it has been real, rather than manufactured.  Maha and I both noticed a long time ago that the righties are following a formula.  Also, a lot of what the righties do is just projection - accuse your opponent of what you are doing and beat them to it first to score the political point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hate speech and anger on the right is a very profitable marketing device that has made millions for Rush Limbaugh, et al.  For the left, it hasn&#8217;t been a marketing ploy, it has been real, rather than manufactured.  Maha and I both noticed a long time ago that the righties are following a formula.  Also, a lot of what the righties do is just projection - accuse your opponent of what you are doing and beat them to it first to score the political point.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gary Boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187246</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-187246</guid>
					<description>Just wanted to drop a note and thanks for the link. You already know how I feel about the angry liberal issue...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Just wanted to drop a note and thanks for the link. You already know how I feel about the angry liberal issue&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dzman49</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-186774</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/25/were-not-angry-dammit/#comment-186774</guid>
					<description>Rage?  Who can forget Sen. Ted Stevens' tantrum over the imperiled 'Bridge to Nowhere?'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Rage?  Who can forget Sen. Ted Stevens&#8217; tantrum over the imperiled &#8216;Bridge to Nowhere?&#8217;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
