Comments on: The Senate’s Turn http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/27/the-senates-turn-2/ Making the World Safe for Liberalism Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:42:29 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: the exile http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/27/the-senates-turn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-189066 the exile Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:34:12 +0000 http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1578#comment-189066 What I don't get is this: everyone with a brain knew that Bush would veto a bill with a pullout provision, even if non-binding, So why did the Blue Dog a**holes fight so hard with Nancy to get their pork, in a bill they knew was destined for a veto? I just don't get it. Unless the Blue Dogs thought they were scamming Pelosi, getting their pork and then hoping that the Republican amendments taking out the pullout language would succeed. If that's the case, I hate the blue dogs even more. What I don’t get is this: everyone with a brain knew that Bush would veto a bill with a pullout provision, even if non-binding, So why did the Blue Dog a**holes fight so hard with Nancy to get their pork, in a bill they knew was destined for a veto? I just don’t get it. Unless the Blue Dogs thought they were scamming Pelosi, getting their pork and then hoping that the Republican amendments taking out the pullout language would succeed. If that’s the case, I hate the blue dogs even more.

]]> By: VJB http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/27/the-senates-turn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-189011 VJB Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:13:10 +0000 http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1578#comment-189011 I simply don't know why the pretzelnit wouldn't simply sign the law (so that the troops are funded), but issue the usual signing statement so he can ignore the congressional language (it's non-binding anyway). I simply don’t know why the pretzelnit wouldn’t simply sign the law (so that the troops are funded), but issue the usual signing statement so he can ignore the congressional language (it’s non-binding anyway).

]]> By: Stella http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/27/the-senates-turn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-188682 Stella Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:06:02 +0000 http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1578#comment-188682 As the Rude One says: "Rats, man, and their sinking ships." As the Rude One says: “Rats, man, and their sinking ships.”

]]> By: Donna http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/27/the-senates-turn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-188255 Donna Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:14:50 +0000 http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1578#comment-188255 Speaking of cute.....GWBush is the opposite of cute with his toddler shenanigans, spoiled bratting/threatening his demands.....the citizens and the majority says 'out of Iraq', little guy throws a fit. Let him hold his breath until he turns blue. Speaking of cute…..GWBush is the opposite of cute with his toddler shenanigans, spoiled bratting/threatening his demands…..the citizens and the majority says ‘out of Iraq’, little guy throws a fit. Let him hold his breath until he turns blue.

]]> By: Swami http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/27/the-senates-turn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-188219 Swami Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:45:25 +0000 http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1578#comment-188219 Ha...Lieberman says we'll... “snatch defeat from the jaws of progress in Iraq,” Isn't that cute? Such a clever modification. How about snatching reality from the jaws of insanity?, or Truthfulness from the jaws of Deceit. Ha…Lieberman says we’ll… “snatch defeat from the jaws of progress in Iraq,”

Isn’t that cute? Such a clever modification. How about snatching reality from the jaws of insanity?, or Truthfulness from the jaws of Deceit.

]]> By: Swami http://www.mahablog.com/2007/03/27/the-senates-turn-2/comment-page-1/#comment-188215 Swami Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:21:40 +0000 http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1578#comment-188215 Let the games begin! Bush better check the ink in his veto pen...it might have dried up with inactivity. No tickey.. no shirtey..no money..no war. : ( Let the games begin!

Bush better check the ink in his veto pen…it might have dried up with inactivity.

No tickey.. no shirtey..no money..no war. : (

]]>