Counterbalancing Bush

-->
Bush Administration, Congress, Middle East

[Update: Make some noise — tell CNN to get the facts right about the Pelosi trip.]

An editorial in today’s Boston Globe:

EVEN AS a matter of political self-interest, President Bush made himself look bad by carping about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit yesterday in Damascus with Syria’s president, Bashar Assad.

Bush’s complaint that Pelosi and the bipartisan congressional delegation were sending “mixed signals” made it appear that Bush either resents or refuses to accept the Constitution’s unambiguous granting of extensive powers in foreign policy to the legislative branch. Pelosi and her colleagues were doing what innumerable delegations of senators and representatives have done in the past: traveling abroad to consult with foreign leaders, gather information, and enhance their ability to fulfill their obligations to advise, consent, and appropriate funds. Republican congressmen met with Assad last week. If the American system of checks and balances is to function properly, the co-equal legislative branch must exercise its powers to check and balance the actions of the executive branch.

Predictably, the Washington Post editorial on the Pelosi trip calls it “foolish shuttle diplomacy.” It’s a foolish editorial, which you may read if you like. I’m skipping right to the commentary. Nico at Think Progress:

The Washington Post editorial page today published a vicious editorial attacking Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), calling her “ludicrous” and describing her bipartisan trip to Syria as an “attempt to establish a shadow presidency.”

The editorial rests on two claims, both of which are baseless.

1) Pelosi passed an incorrect message from Israel to Syria. Pelosi said yesterday that she gave Syrian officials the message that Israel is “ready to engage in peace talks.” The Post falsely claims, “The Israeli prime minister entrusted Ms. Pelosi with no such message,” misinterpreting a statement from the Israeli Prime Minister’s office that simply reiterated its position that talks with Syria will not take place until Syria has taken steps to end its support for extremist elements. There is no evidence that Pelosi failed to communicate this message. In fact, Pelosi’s delegation specifically pressed the Syrian president “over Syria’s support for militant groups and insist[ed] that his government block militants seeking to cross into Iraq and join insurgents there.”

2) Pelosi is attempting to “establish a shadow presidency.” This claim is directly contradicted by the Post’s own reporting this morning, which states, “Foreign policy experts generally agree that Pelosi’s dealings with Middle East leaders have not strayed far, if at all, from those typical for a congressional trip.” Pelosi herself has “described the trip as little different than the visit paid to Syria the same week led by Rep. Frank R. Wolf (R-VA),” and she went to great lengths to express her unity of purpose with President Bush on terrorism issues. The Post’s own reporting today also cites several instances of members of Congress meeting with foreign leaders during the past 30 years. As ThinkProgress noted yesterday, in contrast with Pelosi’s trip, previous congressional actions abroad attempted to directly undermine President Clinton.

See also Frank James at The Swamp.

Publius at Obsidian Wings:

The Washington Post editorial board should apologize for its over-the-top, and borderline sexist, attack on Pelosi for visiting Syria. It’s fine if they have substantive disagreements, but the mocking language they used (“ludicrous,” “foolish,” “Ms. Pelosi grandly declared”) is unprofessional. You don’t see them using this type of Drudge-like mockery even in their strongest attacks on the administration, but it’s ok for Pelosi I suppose.

CNN’s sloppy and inaccurate reporting of the trip hasn’t helped.

Kagro X at Kos:

Meanwhile, the parade of Republicans through Damascus continues unabated, with the arrival of Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), close on the heels of another delegation led by Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA). As we know, Bush, like Boehner, has criticized these delegations as undermining his own “diplomacy.” So what does Darrell have to say?

    Commenting on Bush’s criticism, California Republican Darrell Issa said the president had failed to promote the necessary dialogue to resolve disagreements between the U.S. and Syria.

    “That’s an important message to realize: We have tensions, but we have two functioning embassies.”

And Frank?

    “I don’t care what the administration says on this. You gotta do what you think is in the best interest of your country,” said Rep. Frank Wolf of Virginia, who was part of the delegation.

    “I don’t care what the administration says on this.”

What’s that about going to Syria to embarrass the president, Mr. Boehner?

I don’t think the attacks on Pelosi are so much about Syria as they are about Iraq, or more accurately the supplement bill fight. The hawks are doing everything they can to knock her down, to make her the enemy. They’re desperate.

Update: Joe Conason writes, “The problem is not what Pelosi did or said, but how she exposed the exhaustion of neoconservative policy.” It’s a good article.

Share Button
5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Swami  •  Apr 5, 2007 @9:36 pm

    Bush is such a mutton-head that it boggles my mind. Really, he’s stupid to the 10 th power. Just like a little child..”I’m not gonna talk to you,nah, nah ,nah, you’re evil”. Bull-headed stupidity is what it is!

    Oh, God.. and we elected this Asshole?

  2. joanr16  •  Apr 5, 2007 @9:43 pm

    This is just sickening. Who owns the WaPo now? Halliburton?

  3. Doug Hughes  •  Apr 5, 2007 @9:54 pm

    Way back when – Iran had American hostages from the Embassy when the revolt replaced the Shaw with the Shiite theocracy. Carter was president and the Iranians hated him to the degree that they negotiated the release of the hostages with Reagan and timed the release to coincide with Reagans swearing in. To give credit where it is due, Ronnie sent Carter over to greet the hostages.

    The point being, there is a similar opportunity here, except Bush is too much of a simpleton to realize it. Syria might make concessions to a Democratic delegation in order to embarass Bush, possibly making concessions to Democrats that they would not make to Rice. Were it not for our Presidents megalomaania, we might manipulate the emotional component of their dislike for Bush, plus their eagerness to emerge as a major player in the region into a breakthrough.

  4. gimmeabreak  •  Apr 5, 2007 @10:08 pm

    Oh, I blasted CNN today (oh, an Hi! again, I haven’t been around in a while). I brought up all of Media Matters talking points and added that their morning show was being killed by a radio program and that they’re having to resort to importing discarded “talent” from Fox.

    And damn you Maha (shaking fist)! I bought one of those Pelosi ’07 t-shirts.

    : )

  5. moonbat  •  Apr 5, 2007 @11:50 pm

    Fred Dimwit/Hiatt of the WaPo can go kiss my ass. Nancy Pelosi is looking better and better each move she makes. I just ordered a T-shirt myself and am looking forward to wearing it with pride.



    About this blog

    About Maha
    Comment Policy

    Vintage Mahablog
    Email Me
















    eXTReMe Tracker













      Technorati Profile