<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everything Old Is News Again</title>
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/04/29/everything-old-is-news-again/</link>
	<description>Exposing the ugly truths about the Bush Administration.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: c u n d gulag</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/04/29/everything-old-is-news-again/#comment-212674</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/04/29/everything-old-is-news-again/#comment-212674</guid>
					<description>My question is, as a Defence Department &quot;expert,&quot; did she actually know anything about the Soviet Union or Russia?
Or, did she draw a portrait of Lenin from a matchbook cover to get her degreee?
I saw her on two show's yesterday and I still can't tell you what she said...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My question is, as a Defence Department &#8220;expert,&#8221; did she actually know anything about the Soviet Union or Russia?<br />
Or, did she draw a portrait of Lenin from a matchbook cover to get her degreee?<br />
I saw her on two show&#8217;s yesterday and I still can&#8217;t tell you what she said&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Condoleezza Rice&#8217;s Memory Problem - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/04/29/everything-old-is-news-again/#comment-212457</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/04/29/everything-old-is-news-again/#comment-212457</guid>
					<description>[...] This isn&amp;#8217;t the first time Rice lied about receiving such recommendations. Mahablog provides evidence that Rice had received these warnings from Tenet before, and was caught lying about it. Rice also lied about warnings received from others. In a column in the Washington Post on March 22, 2004, Condoleezza Rice wrote: The al Qaeda terrorist network posed a threat to the United States for almost a decade before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Throughout that period — during the eight years of the Clinton administration and the first eight months of the Bush administration prior to Sept. 11 — the U.S. government worked hard to counter the al Qaeda threat. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] This isn&#8217;t the first time Rice lied about receiving such recommendations. Mahablog provides evidence that Rice had received these warnings from Tenet before, and was caught lying about it. Rice also lied about warnings received from others. In a column in the Washington Post on March 22, 2004, Condoleezza Rice wrote: The al Qaeda terrorist network posed a threat to the United States for almost a decade before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Throughout that period — during the eight years of the Clinton administration and the first eight months of the Bush administration prior to Sept. 11 — the U.S. government worked hard to counter the al Qaeda threat. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Heretik : This Is a New Fact</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/04/29/everything-old-is-news-again/#comment-212439</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/04/29/everything-old-is-news-again/#comment-212439</guid>
					<description>[...] Facts are funny, unchanging things.  A fact is.  Or it is not.  In the Bush Administration facts only exist if they can emerge, often inconveniently.  Rice&amp;#8217;s bears testimony here to her own incompetence.  How has she gotten away with it for so long?  Perhaps somebody can ask that. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] Facts are funny, unchanging things.  A fact is.  Or it is not.  In the Bush Administration facts only exist if they can emerge, often inconveniently.  Rice&#8217;s bears testimony here to her own incompetence.  How has she gotten away with it for so long?  Perhaps somebody can ask that. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
