<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Subpoenas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mahablog.com/2007/06/21/subpoenas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/06/21/subpoenas/</link>
	<description>Making the World Safe for Liberalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:08:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/06/21/subpoenas/comment-page-1/#comment-246021</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1874#comment-246021</guid>
		<description>Oops. Wrong thread...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops. Wrong thread&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade Rutherford</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/06/21/subpoenas/comment-page-1/#comment-246018</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade Rutherford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=1874#comment-246018</guid>
		<description>I happily voted for Nader in 2000, because the district I lived in was entirely Democratic and would go to Al Gore anyway.  I wanted the Green Party to get some recognition

In 2004, I had moved to a rural district and so I was forced to vote for that Republican posing as a Democrat Kerry.

In 2008 I will NOT vote for Senator Clinton, if she gets the nomination.  I can not in good conscience vote for another Republican posing as a Democrat, which she is.  I&#039;ll vote for Kucinich or maybe Gravel.  I would vote for Edwards, since his Republicanism is less pronounced than Clinton or Obama&#039;s.

Here&#039;s one litmus test: any candidate that says they will not immediately remove all US troops from Bush&#039;s immoral war on the Iraqi people is NOT a Democrat, but a Republican posing as a Democrat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happily voted for Nader in 2000, because the district I lived in was entirely Democratic and would go to Al Gore anyway.  I wanted the Green Party to get some recognition</p>
<p>In 2004, I had moved to a rural district and so I was forced to vote for that Republican posing as a Democrat Kerry.</p>
<p>In 2008 I will NOT vote for Senator Clinton, if she gets the nomination.  I can not in good conscience vote for another Republican posing as a Democrat, which she is.  I&#8217;ll vote for Kucinich or maybe Gravel.  I would vote for Edwards, since his Republicanism is less pronounced than Clinton or Obama&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s one litmus test: any candidate that says they will not immediately remove all US troops from Bush&#8217;s immoral war on the Iraqi people is NOT a Democrat, but a Republican posing as a Democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
