<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mighty Links</title>
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/</link>
	<description>Exposing the ugly truths about the Bush Administration.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Buzzcook</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-324690</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-324690</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Yes, Iraq was always going to be hugely difficult, but the potential payoff of erecting a decent, democratizing government in the heart of the Arab world was also enormous&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Just pointing out that the new improved Tommy Friedman still thinks the unprovoked invasion of another country was just a peachy idea. Too bad George Bush was in charge of Tommy's dream or it would have all been tea and cakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>&#8220;Yes, Iraq was always going to be hugely difficult, but the potential payoff of erecting a decent, democratizing government in the heart of the Arab world was also enormous&#8221;</i></p>
	<p>Just pointing out that the new improved Tommy Friedman still thinks the unprovoked invasion of another country was just a peachy idea. Too bad George Bush was in charge of Tommy&#8217;s dream or it would have all been tea and cakes.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: grendelkhan</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-323177</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-323177</guid>
					<description>How venial. They're not even &lt;i&gt;saying&lt;/i&gt; anything over at NewsBusters; they're just getting their ritualized hate on, complete with its obligatory wankish fantasies of Islamofascists cutting the throats of their enemies while they wag their fingers and explain that they &lt;i&gt;told you so&lt;/i&gt;.

But this, I think, is the part that disgusts me the most. It's &lt;i&gt;cowardice&lt;/i&gt;, pure and simple, from a group that prides itself on its machismo.
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2007/10/14/nyts-rich-bush-admin-uses-gestapo-techniques-americans-akin-good-g#comment-454445&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bassndude&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;: For my money, I dont care how, what, when or where question these thugs. I dont care if they kill em in the process, so long as it is to keep my grandkids safe in the schools.&lt;/blockquote&gt; This reminds me of something. Something I can't quite put my finger on...

Ah, yes.
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,,1995270,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joel Surnow, creator of &lt;i&gt;24&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;: I would bet there are a lot of soldiers fighting wars, on all sides, in all sorts of conflicts, under pressure when the bullets are flying and wanting information, who do all sorts of things. And I don't want to know about it. I just want to be safe.&lt;/blockquote&gt; If only Ben Franklin had specified that we shouldn't be so quick to give up &lt;i&gt;others'&lt;/i&gt; liberty to gain &lt;i&gt;our&lt;/i&gt; safety, perhaps we wouldn't be seeing this kind of pusillanimity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>How venial. They&#8217;re not even <i>saying</i> anything over at NewsBusters; they&#8217;re just getting their ritualized hate on, complete with its obligatory wankish fantasies of Islamofascists cutting the throats of their enemies while they wag their fingers and explain that they <i>told you so</i>.</p>
	<p>But this, I think, is the part that disgusts me the most. It&#8217;s <i>cowardice</i>, pure and simple, from a group that prides itself on its machismo.</p>
	<blockquote><p><b><a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2007/10/14/nyts-rich-bush-admin-uses-gestapo-techniques-americans-akin-good-g#comment-454445" rel="nofollow">bassndude</a></b>: For my money, I dont care how, what, when or where question these thugs. I dont care if they kill em in the process, so long as it is to keep my grandkids safe in the schools.</blockquote>
 This reminds me of something. Something I can&#8217;t quite put my finger on&#8230;</p>
	<p>Ah, yes.</p>
	<blockquote><p><b><a href="http://media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,,1995270,00.html" rel="nofollow">Joel Surnow, creator of <i>24</i></a></b>: I would bet there are a lot of soldiers fighting wars, on all sides, in all sorts of conflicts, under pressure when the bullets are flying and wanting information, who do all sorts of things. And I don&#8217;t want to know about it. I just want to be safe.</blockquote>
 If only Ben Franklin had specified that we shouldn&#8217;t be so quick to give up <i>others&#8217;</i> liberty to gain <i>our</i> safety, perhaps we wouldn&#8217;t be seeing this kind of pusillanimity.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bonnie</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-323052</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-323052</guid>
					<description>For all the cat lovers:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/14/weekinreview/14burns.html?ei=5090&amp;#38;en=3df6859eb98f28e0&amp;#38;ex=1350014400&amp;#38;partner=rssuserland&amp;#38;emc=rss&amp;#38;pagewanted=print

It will tug at your heart regarding the human lives in Iraq, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>For all the cat lovers:</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/14/weekinreview/14burns.html?ei=5090&amp;en=3df6859eb98f28e0&amp;ex=1350014400&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=print' rel='nofollow'>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/14/weekinreview/14burns.html?ei=5090&amp;en=3df6859eb98f28e0&amp;ex=1350014400&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=print</a></p>
	<p>It will tug at your heart regarding the human lives in Iraq, too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: joanr16</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-323035</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-323035</guid>
					<description>Correct, the &quot;objective counts&quot; argument is complete fantasy.

And in the subjective &lt;i&gt;court&lt;/i&gt; of opinion, Nobel laureate Gore is kicking Bush's ass.

To have an American win the Peace Prize this year is something that should make &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; Americans proud.  The current administration's actions in Iraq had all but guaranteed that no American would win for another 20 or 30 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Correct, the &#8220;objective counts&#8221; argument is complete fantasy.</p>
	<p>And in the subjective <i>court</i> of opinion, Nobel laureate Gore is kicking Bush&#8217;s ass.</p>
	<p>To have an American win the Peace Prize this year is something that should make <i>all</i> Americans proud.  The current administration&#8217;s actions in Iraq had all but guaranteed that no American would win for another 20 or 30 years.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: moonbat</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-322956</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-322956</guid>
					<description>Saying that the war is being fought by the highest ethical standards is a standard rightie canard, by those who refuse to look at the data. Or who don't care even when they do. We're righteous, by definition. Period.

Along with Frank Rich, I'd also add this frightening piece by Naomi Wolf, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/10/12/4502/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;American Tears&lt;/a&gt;. It's about all the people who've come up to her on her book tour (she wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/End-America-Letter-Warning-Patriot/dp/1933392797/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-0685328-0539941?ie=UTF8&amp;#38;s=books&amp;#38;qid=1192378756&amp;#38;sr=8-1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot&lt;/a&gt;),who are frightened and paralyzed to take action, because they'll face some sort of recrimination, or end up on a list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Saying that the war is being fought by the highest ethical standards is a standard rightie canard, by those who refuse to look at the data. Or who don&#8217;t care even when they do. We&#8217;re righteous, by definition. Period.</p>
	<p>Along with Frank Rich, I&#8217;d also add this frightening piece by Naomi Wolf, <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/10/12/4502/" rel="nofollow">American Tears</a>. It&#8217;s about all the people who&#8217;ve come up to her on her book tour (she wrote <a href="http://www.amazon.com/End-America-Letter-Warning-Patriot/dp/1933392797/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-0685328-0539941?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1192378756&amp;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot</a>),who are frightened and paralyzed to take action, because they&#8217;ll face some sort of recrimination, or end up on a list.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: goatherd</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-322951</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-322951</guid>
					<description>As you have it posted it says &quot;counts&quot; not &quot;courts&quot;.

I believe objective counts found just the opposite. Florida's criterion for counting a vote is the &quot;voter's intent&quot;. When the entire state was recounted, Gore won.  When the criterion of voter's intent was applied to thousands of &quot;overvotes&quot; in which for example, the box for Gore was checked and &quot;Gore&quot; was also written in a space marked &quot;write in candidate&quot;, Gore won by a few thousand votes.  I think any rational person would agree that the voter's intent is clear in this particular kind of overvote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As you have it posted it says &#8220;counts&#8221; not &#8220;courts&#8221;.</p>
	<p>I believe objective counts found just the opposite. Florida&#8217;s criterion for counting a vote is the &#8220;voter&#8217;s intent&#8221;. When the entire state was recounted, Gore won.  When the criterion of voter&#8217;s intent was applied to thousands of &#8220;overvotes&#8221; in which for example, the box for Gore was checked and &#8220;Gore&#8221; was also written in a space marked &#8220;write in candidate&#8221;, Gore won by a few thousand votes.  I think any rational person would agree that the voter&#8217;s intent is clear in this particular kind of overvote.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jeffreyw</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-322948</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-322948</guid>
					<description>in update two, it is &quot;counts&quot;, not &quot;courts&quot; in the excerpted bit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>in update two, it is &#8220;counts&#8221;, not &#8220;courts&#8221; in the excerpted bit
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: recommended reading &#166; Blog and News Tidbets</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-322946</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-322946</guid>
					<description>[...] Mighty Links [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] Mighty Links [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: grayslady</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-322930</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-322930</guid>
					<description>The normal quasi-humorous sarcasm was notably missing from today's column by Frank Rich. Along with the recent works by the two Naomis (Klein and Wolf), the focus has clearly shifted to trying to sound the alarm loudly and clearly. I used to wonder how the German people could have accepted Nazism. I have a whole new insight thanks to the last 7 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The normal quasi-humorous sarcasm was notably missing from today&#8217;s column by Frank Rich. Along with the recent works by the two Naomis (Klein and Wolf), the focus has clearly shifted to trying to sound the alarm loudly and clearly. I used to wonder how the German people could have accepted Nazism. I have a whole new insight thanks to the last 7 years.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: erinyes</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-322919</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/14/mighty-links/#comment-322919</guid>
					<description>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/american-tears_b_68141.html
Please add this to the list...........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href='http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/american-tears_b_68141.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/american-tears_b_68141.html</a><br />
Please add this to the list&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
