<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fun and Games With FISA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/18/fun-and-games-with-fisa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/18/fun-and-games-with-fisa/</link>
	<description>Making the World Safe for Liberalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:36:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/18/fun-and-games-with-fisa/comment-page-1/#comment-330159</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 23:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=2202#comment-330159</guid>
		<description>Can anyone explain to me WHY the Democrats would consider amnesty for the Telecoms in any revised FISA legislation? Other than campaign contributions, I mean. I read Glen Greenwald and I have one question.  How much money were the Telecoms paid to sell out their clients and customers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone explain to me WHY the Democrats would consider amnesty for the Telecoms in any revised FISA legislation? Other than campaign contributions, I mean. I read Glen Greenwald and I have one question.  How much money were the Telecoms paid to sell out their clients and customers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felicity</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/18/fun-and-games-with-fisa/comment-page-1/#comment-329961</link>
		<dc:creator>felicity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=2202#comment-329961</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t the original FISA bill contain provisions that a warrant could be obtained within 72 hours AFTER the fact and/or within 15 days AFTER the fact depending on certain circumstances?

That said, last week the Dem argument supporting Bush on FISA was because should there be a terrorist attack any Dem voting to not support Bush etc. would be blamed for the attack.  Nevermind the face-value idiocy of that excuse, nobody blamed Bush for 9/11 in spite of the fact that it happened on his watch.  He even got re-elected.  Apparently the Dems missed that little fact when they contrived the argument to support him.  Brain-dead is all I can say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the original FISA bill contain provisions that a warrant could be obtained within 72 hours AFTER the fact and/or within 15 days AFTER the fact depending on certain circumstances?</p>
<p>That said, last week the Dem argument supporting Bush on FISA was because should there be a terrorist attack any Dem voting to not support Bush etc. would be blamed for the attack.  Nevermind the face-value idiocy of that excuse, nobody blamed Bush for 9/11 in spite of the fact that it happened on his watch.  He even got re-elected.  Apparently the Dems missed that little fact when they contrived the argument to support him.  Brain-dead is all I can say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/18/fun-and-games-with-fisa/comment-page-1/#comment-329860</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=2202#comment-329860</guid>
		<description>America has been betrayed by the people who are supposed to be working for America.   I agree, vote them all out of office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America has been betrayed by the people who are supposed to be working for America.   I agree, vote them all out of office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c u n d gulag</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/10/18/fun-and-games-with-fisa/comment-page-1/#comment-329716</link>
		<dc:creator>c u n d gulag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=2202#comment-329716</guid>
		<description>None of this should come as any surprise - least of all the telecom amnesty.  
The Corporatist&#039;s who are our legistlator&#039;s can&#039;t look out for the peoples welfare because they&#039;re too busy lining their pocket&#039;s for future elections where they&#039;ll need more cash.  &quot;Children, can you say &quot;Quid pro quo?  I knew that you could...&quot;   
Granting these companies amnesty before knowing what they did is a travesty of justice.  Though we think we know what they did, we&#039;ll never know.  It&#039;s like having a suspect in police custody and giving them amnesty before the detectives can investigate what was done.
We have two choices to save America:
1.  Vote them all out.
2.  Public financing of elections.
There&#039;s a third choice, of course.  But I&#039;ll leave it at that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of this should come as any surprise &#8211; least of all the telecom amnesty.<br />
The Corporatist&#8217;s who are our legistlator&#8217;s can&#8217;t look out for the peoples welfare because they&#8217;re too busy lining their pocket&#8217;s for future elections where they&#8217;ll need more cash.  &#8220;Children, can you say &#8220;Quid pro quo?  I knew that you could&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Granting these companies amnesty before knowing what they did is a travesty of justice.  Though we think we know what they did, we&#8217;ll never know.  It&#8217;s like having a suspect in police custody and giving them amnesty before the detectives can investigate what was done.<br />
We have two choices to save America:<br />
1.  Vote them all out.<br />
2.  Public financing of elections.<br />
There&#8217;s a third choice, of course.  But I&#8217;ll leave it at that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
