Don’t Pity the Fool

-->
environment, science

The notion that global warming is merely a hoax — or, at least, is not being caused by humans — is firmly entrenched among righties. Countless megabytes have been devoted to “exposing” the hoax. Most of their arguments, such as this one, reveal that they understand global climate change about as well as I understand quantum mechanics. Which is pretty much not at all.

Some of the “it’s a hoax” sites are hoaxes themselves, even spoofs. Recently our pal Rush mistook a site spoofing climate change deniers for a serious anti-climate change argument.

Breaking news: “proof” that global warming is entirely a natural event published in a definitive looking (okay, at first glance) site with The Journal of Geoclimatic Studies. (The links are down. Great Beyond has links to the cache material.) According to a ‘research paper’ published on the website, rising levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are coming from CO2 emissions from “saprotrophic eubacteria living in the sediments of the continental shelves fringing the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.” In other words, humanity had no role. Well, this paper began to run the lines of the Climate Denier branch of the Flat Earth Society.

Well, add Rush to the list of Flat Earthers caught, well, caught flat-footed. Yes, “America’s Truth Detector” has such a good nose for fraud that we can expect that Brooklyn Bridge salesmen have had a good time with him.DeSmogBlog has a run of some of those who chose to run with this fantasy. Well, for these Flat Earthers, one problem: none of the authors existed.

The author of the site said in an interview –

Its purpose was to expose the credulity and scientific illiteracy of many of the people who call themselves climate sceptics. While dismissive of the work of the great majority of climate scientists, they will believe almost anything if it lends support to their position. Their approach to climate science is the opposite of scepticism.

Are you surprised at the pick up your coverage has generated?

Not really. Equally ridiculous claims – like those in the paper attached to the “Oregon Petition” or David Bellamy’s dodgy glacier figures – have been widely circulated and taken up by the ‘sceptic’ community. But you can explain this until you are blue in the face. To get people to sit up and listen, you have to demonstrate it. This is what I set out to do.

How quickly did you expect people to realise that your paper was fake?

In the Age of Google, hoaxes can’t last for very long. But it hooked quite a few prominent sceptics before it was exposed. According to the various exposes now circulating online, among others, Rush Limbaugh broadcast it on his programme, James Inhofe’s office posted it on his site [Editor's note: Sen. Inhofe's office says it was never posted on his website], Benny Peiser sent it to 2000 people and Ron Bailey wrote it up in glowing terms.

This rightie “it’s a hoax” site also says Michael Savage was taken in.

It gets worse. Last week Rush blasted an Eskimo teenager for speaking out about global warming. Erika Bolstad writes for McClatchy Newspapers:

Charlee Lockwood has never heard of Rush Limbaugh or listened to his radio program, and perhaps it’s just as well.

On Monday, the talk radio king told listeners that Democrats were exploiting the 18-year-old Yupik Eskimo, and that her emotional testimony that day in front of a U.S. House committee on global warming made him “really want to puke. I just want to throw up.”

“It’s the Democrats exploiting a young child, ladies and gentlemen, for the advancement of a political issue that will grow the size of government and increase their control over everyone,” Limbaugh told listeners of the 600 stations nationwide that carry his show.

Lockwood didn’t let Limbaugh’s comments faze her. Her upbringing in the community of St. Michael included learning “about respect and treating people the way you want to be treated,” Lockwood said, during a brief interview just before she got on a plane to return to her village on Alaska’s west coast.

And she had plenty of people willing to defend her.

“For Rush Limbaugh to make fun of young people coming in and trying to be a part of the political process, it really shows a disdain for political discourse and for the role of young people in that political discourse,” said Eben Burnham-Snyder, a spokesman for the chairman of the committee, Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass.

Limbaugh’s attack on the teenager was “outrageous and grotesque,” said Deborah Williams, an Anchorage environmentalist who accompanied Lockwood on the teen’s first trip to the nation’s capital in 2005. It’s one thing to take aim at a public figure, Williams said, but it’s quite another to attack someone young and eager to participate in the democratic process.

You think Limbaugh gives a bleep for the democratic process?

Share
7 Comments

6 Comments

  1. c u n d gulag  •  Nov 10, 2007 @9:38 am

    Maha,
    “You think Limbaugh gives a bleep for the democratic process?” No, what he cares about is the “Republican” progress.

    What I don’t get is the lack of any concern. I don’t have any kid’s, but I want to help start cleaning-up the mess my generation has helped make. And that includes the environment.

    Don’t these people care about the air their kid’s and grandkid’s will breathe? The water they drink? The food they eat? The weather they’ll encounter?
    Deny all you want. But you can’t deny that even if there is no emergency, it wouldn’t hurt not to strip-mine mountain tops by blowing debris sky-high and pollute the nearby water’s with waste from that mining.

    Is that dollar in your pocket more important than what your child eat’s, breathe’s, drink’s?
    I just don’t get it. I guess that’s what makes me a Liberal. I don’t have any money, so I can’t understand it’s allure.

    Can anyone explain this as anything other than, “I’m right, you’re wrong, and I’d rather die, and my kid’s die, than agree with ANYTHING you say!!!?”
    WTF?

  2. Cody  •  Nov 10, 2007 @9:55 am

    This Limbaugh guy seems to really hate kids. From Chelsea to SCHIP to this, he is always looking for someone smaller to pick on.

  3. paulywood  •  Nov 10, 2007 @11:57 am

    Does this remind anyone else of the intelligent design people? Near-total scientific illiteracy meets the perennial and indomitable belief that the world’s scientists and academics are all a bunch of idiots and conspiracy theorists. (Clearly evidenced by the lack of practical applications for secular biological sciences throughout the 20th century.)

  4. joanr16  •  Nov 10, 2007 @12:33 pm

    It’s the Democrats exploiting a young child….

    Oh, for frack’s sake, Rush. As someone who once was busted returning from the Dominican Republic with a bagful of Viagra, you know damn well that an 18-year-old is not a “young child”!

  5. c u n d gulag  •  Nov 10, 2007 @8:30 pm

    joanr16,
    18? That’s waaaaaaaay to old for Rush!

    joanr16, thankfully, you’re not joanr6,7 ,8 ,9 10, or 11, or you’d know…
    Here’s what else was in the bag when he got busted after his 2-week stay: Cheez-IT’s, plier’s, motion-lotion, mild taco-sauce, jumper-cable’s, gummy-worm’s, a monkey-wrench, 3 Ken doll’s, 2 Trojan’s (one as a back-up), sand, vaseline, sand in the vaseline, nipple-clamp’s, and Crisco.

    It’s not just fun, it’s a RUSH!!!

  6. Bill Arnold  •  Nov 10, 2007 @9:34 pm

    That “paper” was complete gibberish, though amusing. You’d think Rush or one of his staff and the others taken in by it might have Googled up some of the terminology, or the authors, or well, something to see if it was real.

1 Trackback



    About this blog



    About Maha
    Comment Policy

    Vintage Mahablog
    Email Me


















    Support This Site





    site design and daughterly goodness

    eXTReMe Tracker













      Technorati Profile