Comments on: Don’t Pity the Fool

By: Bill Arnold

Bill Arnold — Sun, 11 Nov 2007 02:34:08 +0000

That “paper” was complete gibberish, though amusing. You’d think Rush or one of his staff and the others taken in by it might have Googled up some of the terminology, or the authors, or well, something to see if it was real.

By: c u n d gulag

c u n d gulag — Sun, 11 Nov 2007 01:30:47 +0000

joanr16,
18? That’s waaaaaaaay to old for Rush!

joanr16, thankfully, you’re not joanr6,7 ,8 ,9 10, or 11, or you’d know…
Here’s what else was in the bag when he got busted after his 2-week stay: Cheez-IT’s, plier’s, motion-lotion, mild taco-sauce, jumper-cable’s, gummy-worm’s, a monkey-wrench, 3 Ken doll’s, 2 Trojan’s (one as a back-up), sand, vaseline, sand in the vaseline, nipple-clamp’s, and Crisco.

It’s not just fun, it’s a RUSH!!!

By: joanr16

joanr16 — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:33:09 +0000

It’s the Democrats exploiting a young child….

Oh, for frack’s sake, Rush. As someone who once was busted returning from the Dominican Republic with a bagful of Viagra, you know damn well that an 18-year-old is not a “young child”!

By: paulywood

paulywood — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:57:22 +0000

Does this remind anyone else of the intelligent design people? Near-total scientific illiteracy meets the perennial and indomitable belief that the world’s scientists and academics are all a bunch of idiots and conspiracy theorists. (Clearly evidenced by the lack of practical applications for secular biological sciences throughout the 20th century.)

By: Cody

Cody — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:55:48 +0000

This Limbaugh guy seems to really hate kids. From Chelsea to SCHIP to this, he is always looking for someone smaller to pick on.

By: Generalising Russell’s Law? « Further thoughts

Generalising Russell’s Law? « Further thoughts — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:47:55 +0000

[...] Generalising Russell’s Law? Posted on November 10, 2007 by Ian Barbara O’Brien reports on a spoof global warming denial site which many people – including ‘comedian’ Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, and possibly Senator Jim Inhofe’s staff – took for the real thing. [...]

By: c u n d gulag

c u n d gulag — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:38:59 +0000

Maha,
“You think Limbaugh gives a bleep for the democratic process?” No, what he cares about is the “Republican” progress.

What I don’t get is the lack of any concern. I don’t have any kid’s, but I want to help start cleaning-up the mess my generation has helped make. And that includes the environment.

Don’t these people care about the air their kid’s and grandkid’s will breathe? The water they drink? The food they eat? The weather they’ll encounter?
Deny all you want. But you can’t deny that even if there is no emergency, it wouldn’t hurt not to strip-mine mountain tops by blowing debris sky-high and pollute the nearby water’s with waste from that mining.

Is that dollar in your pocket more important than what your child eat’s, breathe’s, drink’s?
I just don’t get it. I guess that’s what makes me a Liberal. I don’t have any money, so I can’t understand it’s allure.

Can anyone explain this as anything other than, “I’m right, you’re wrong, and I’d rather die, and my kid’s die, than agree with ANYTHING you say!!!?”
WTF?