Comments on: Nothing Is Inevitable

By: maha

maha — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:36:58 +0000

hettiemae — Chill. I didn’t say I agreed with them. I said it was honest because it’s what they really think.This is called “snark.”

By: hettiemae

hettiemae — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 02:05:18 +0000

“I’m glad to see Republicans running an honest campaign for a change.” So, you think when Republicans “mock her proposals, utter her name with a sneer, say her ideas are un-American” that that is an ‘honest’ campaign. I am totally confused. I’ve been reading this blog for about three years and thought you were an intelligent person. But this is about as ignorant as you can get.

By: jello

jello — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:42:39 +0000

wes clark admitted on charlie rose after he bowed out that he was pushed into the race by senior democratic people (guess from which camp? hint: he’s endorsing one of the candidates now running.) to enter the race late to act as spoiler. guess who he took votes away from?

i just adore the clintons lust for power and how they think they can manipulate and hold the party hostage for their own ends. i mean why even bother with a primary? let’s just crown her nominee. how can we deny what is owed to her?

By: calling all toasters

calling all toasters — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:56:59 +0000

But what will the eventual nominee campaign on if Senator Clinton is not his opponent? The poor dear will have to run on issues.

You’re kidding, right?

By: Bonnie

Bonnie — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:48:46 +0000

I have a girlfriend who on several major election days was asked by a press person who she voted for (exit poll, I guess). She told me she told that person she voted for X when in fact she had voted for Y. She thought it was funny to lie to the poll takers. I wonder how many other people do that.

Mah said, “So tell me again why the bobbleheads keep talking about a Clinton-Giuliani race in 2008?”

Because that is who these bobbleheads want in the race. They will do any thing to get what they want even very bad journalism. I wish if these guys got degrees in journalism in some college that that college would take their degrees away from them since they are using them improperly.

By: maha

maha — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:08:29 +0000

Dan — I read that also, but if the lesson of 2004 still holds, if someone gets decisive wins in Iowa and New Hampshire that candidate will gain an advantage in the other primaries as well. I think Giuliani’s strategy is an admission of weakness on his part.

By: Dan

Dan — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:53:20 +0000

The “perceived wisdom” is that Giuliani is not spending time or money in any of the small runup states before the big splash (Florida? for Reps). So he polls lightly in the harbinger states. Just the opposite strategy taken by Bush, and by the Dems in ‘06.