<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oops!</title>
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/</link>
	<description>Exposing the ugly truths about the Bush Administration.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Swami</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527427</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527427</guid>
					<description>Hillary's campaign workers say she acted intrepidly in the New Jersey post primary Cuban Sandwich Crisis. In military matters, where Hillary is well grounded, not everybody knows that an army of campaign workers travels on its stomach.

Obama's response to the 3 am. fear mongering ad was a perfect deflection. A classic implementation of the childhood saying.. &quot; I'm rubber, you're glue, whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you.&quot; He turned the intention of the ad around and clobbered both Hillary and McCain simultaneously for not having the wisdom nor the foresight to oppose Bush's blunder in Iraq. And both Hillary and McCain aren't left with any argument to counter with, other than to defend their decisions by defending Bush's failed policy. Well, I guess Hillary can always claim she was duped, but that won't fare well for her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hillary&#8217;s campaign workers say she acted intrepidly in the New Jersey post primary Cuban Sandwich Crisis. In military matters, where Hillary is well grounded, not everybody knows that an army of campaign workers travels on its stomach.</p>
	<p>Obama&#8217;s response to the 3 am. fear mongering ad was a perfect deflection. A classic implementation of the childhood saying.. &#8221; I&#8217;m rubber, you&#8217;re glue, whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you.&#8221; He turned the intention of the ad around and clobbered both Hillary and McCain simultaneously for not having the wisdom nor the foresight to oppose Bush&#8217;s blunder in Iraq. And both Hillary and McCain aren&#8217;t left with any argument to counter with, other than to defend their decisions by defending Bush&#8217;s failed policy. Well, I guess Hillary can always claim she was duped, but that won&#8217;t fare well for her.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: joanr16</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527419</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527419</guid>
					<description>I believe Webb supports telecomm immunity, though.  A serious Constitutional weak spot.  We can't afford that, going forward.  &lt;i&gt;Obey the law or do the time&lt;/i&gt; ought to be the next Dem president's motto.

Swami, you may have meant Hillary was &quot;Baptista'd&quot; by fire, and not realized it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I believe Webb supports telecomm immunity, though.  A serious Constitutional weak spot.  We can&#8217;t afford that, going forward.  <i>Obey the law or do the time</i> ought to be the next Dem president&#8217;s motto.</p>
	<p>Swami, you may have meant Hillary was &#8220;Baptista&#8217;d&#8221; by fire, and not realized it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: D.R. Marvel</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527401</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 07:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527401</guid>
					<description>&quot;Baptism of Fire&quot; is a very real experience and it's another example of such terms being subjected to prostitution for/by politicians...

 Advertisers are destroying what little is left of the Public Discourse...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Baptism of Fire&#8221; is a very real experience and it&#8217;s another example of such terms being subjected to prostitution for/by politicians&#8230;</p>
	<p> Advertisers are destroying what little is left of the Public Discourse&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Swami</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527391</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527391</guid>
					<description>Oh, that's&quot; baptized by fire&quot;..I'll be alright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh, that&#8217;s&#8221; baptized by fire&#8221;..I&#8217;ll be alright.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Swami</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527390</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527390</guid>
					<description>I've heard the claim by the Clinton campaign that Hillary has been &quot;baptisted by fire&quot;, but I haven't seen any indication of it. The closest I've seen to trials for Hillary is when she faced the public humiliation of her husband's infidelity..The whole cigar thing was just a tad over the top for public exposure...and Hillary carried herself well through the humiliation of that horrible ordeal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve heard the claim by the Clinton campaign that Hillary has been &#8220;baptisted by fire&#8221;, but I haven&#8217;t seen any indication of it. The closest I&#8217;ve seen to trials for Hillary is when she faced the public humiliation of her husband&#8217;s infidelity..The whole cigar thing was just a tad over the top for public exposure&#8230;and Hillary carried herself well through the humiliation of that horrible ordeal.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527389</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527389</guid>
					<description>Sachem -- You could be right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sachem &#8212; You could be right.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sachem</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527388</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 02:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527388</guid>
					<description>Listening to today's back and forth about who can make the best decisions at 3 am or any other time of day, I think Senator Webb is the best choice for Sen Obama's Vice Presidential running mate.  

There would be a distinct mixture of temperament and life experiences, not to mention enormous military credibility and all important Virginia.  (A democratic governor to clean up the succession and the coattails for the new Senator Warner (D) don't hurt either).

When Barack asks, &quot;What do you think Jim?&quot;, Sen Webb will offer a perspective that singularly outshines Sen McCain's inevitably tainted world view.  It buries the Nat'l Security weakspot in Barack's resume once and for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Listening to today&#8217;s back and forth about who can make the best decisions at 3 am or any other time of day, I think Senator Webb is the best choice for Sen Obama&#8217;s Vice Presidential running mate.  </p>
	<p>There would be a distinct mixture of temperament and life experiences, not to mention enormous military credibility and all important Virginia.  (A democratic governor to clean up the succession and the coattails for the new Senator Warner (D) don&#8217;t hurt either).</p>
	<p>When Barack asks, &#8220;What do you think Jim?&#8221;, Sen Webb will offer a perspective that singularly outshines Sen McCain&#8217;s inevitably tainted world view.  It buries the Nat&#8217;l Security weakspot in Barack&#8217;s resume once and for all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: calling all toasters</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527386</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/02/29/oops-3/#comment-527386</guid>
					<description>How about facing down bloodthirsty Obamabots that refuse to recognize her right to the nomination?

God, I am sick of the Clinton campaign.  And I'm sick of her, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>How about facing down bloodthirsty Obamabots that refuse to recognize her right to the nomination?</p>
	<p>God, I am sick of the Clinton campaign.  And I&#8217;m sick of her, too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
