<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Jacksonian Than Jackson</title>
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/</link>
	<description>Exposing the ugly truths about the Bush Administration.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: felicity</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-531063</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-531063</guid>
					<description>Maha, reminds me of Hillary's claim of responsibility - if not the sole mover and shaker - for establishing the Children's Defense Fund.  Actually it was Marion Wright Edelman who was responsible. I find it interesting that Edelman, a black woman highly respected in the black community, has yet to back Hillary???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maha, reminds me of Hillary&#8217;s claim of responsibility - if not the sole mover and shaker - for establishing the Children&#8217;s Defense Fund.  Actually it was Marion Wright Edelman who was responsible. I find it interesting that Edelman, a black woman highly respected in the black community, has yet to back Hillary???
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ppatt</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-531062</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-531062</guid>
					<description>GrannyEagle sez (how do you do italics?):

&quot;In my way of thinking, we (humans) need to have our head in the heavens while having our feet firmly planted in Mother Earth. So, in my analysis, yes, it is trusting a lot to think Obama will do what he claims he will do but I’m willing to take that chance. He comes across to me as a genuine person who does not let fear keep him from trying impossible things. &quot;

Nothing sets my threat klaxons blaring like a politician or one of their blind followers who starts by telling me why not to trust. I tend not to even want to go there because that descends to a level that we all need to rise above. I usually throw it right back at them and suggest that if they have any positive and compelling reasons for trusting a candidate then let them be known.

It should be easy to spot arguments from the rhetorically bankrupt. We hear things like &quot;they rose from the same slime as all the rest of them&quot; or &quot;he did nothing to fix it&quot; as caricatures that take a step back from the actual words and deeds of the candidates. This is what those who do not want to be confronted with the words and deeds of those who they advocate do.

You have my respect for being willing to state just why you trust but I doubt anyone who is more inclined to spout unsubstantiated ad hominem will be moved. I could easily have a discussion with you regarding my reasons to trust Obama over Clinton without being unduly negative but I'd be more inclined, with hettie, to ask &quot;whaddya got?&quot;, because I hear very little and see little willingness to answer that sort of question given the tired old negative myths with which she leads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>GrannyEagle sez (how do you do italics?):</p>
	<p>&#8220;In my way of thinking, we (humans) need to have our head in the heavens while having our feet firmly planted in Mother Earth. So, in my analysis, yes, it is trusting a lot to think Obama will do what he claims he will do but I’m willing to take that chance. He comes across to me as a genuine person who does not let fear keep him from trying impossible things. &#8221;</p>
	<p>Nothing sets my threat klaxons blaring like a politician or one of their blind followers who starts by telling me why not to trust. I tend not to even want to go there because that descends to a level that we all need to rise above. I usually throw it right back at them and suggest that if they have any positive and compelling reasons for trusting a candidate then let them be known.</p>
	<p>It should be easy to spot arguments from the rhetorically bankrupt. We hear things like &#8220;they rose from the same slime as all the rest of them&#8221; or &#8220;he did nothing to fix it&#8221; as caricatures that take a step back from the actual words and deeds of the candidates. This is what those who do not want to be confronted with the words and deeds of those who they advocate do.</p>
	<p>You have my respect for being willing to state just why you trust but I doubt anyone who is more inclined to spout unsubstantiated ad hominem will be moved. I could easily have a discussion with you regarding my reasons to trust Obama over Clinton without being unduly negative but I&#8217;d be more inclined, with hettie, to ask &#8220;whaddya got?&#8221;, because I hear very little and see little willingness to answer that sort of question given the tired old negative myths with which she leads.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: LongHairedWeirdo</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-531057</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-531057</guid>
					<description>Maha, my understanding is that Hillary Clinton was instrumental in getting Bill Clinton to sign the SCHIP bill. 

I'm on the fence about whether she deserves to be credited for it. I mean, no questions asked, she knew it was a good idea, but then, a lot of people did. 

But she's playing it up as part of her &quot;experience&quot; claims. And I'm willing to grant that she helped save it from a veto, and I grant that it was a good action for her to take. But I'm not sure you can call that &quot;experience&quot;. It's one thing to haggle with lawmakers, and another to convince your spouse. 

It's like (I have *NO* idea what charitable contributions the Clintons have made; I'm going to make up an example), if they made a charitable donation to food banks, I wouldn't count that as &quot;experience in helping feed the hungry&quot;. But I wouldn't deny that it proves that she and Bill *care* about the hungry, and that matters too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maha, my understanding is that Hillary Clinton was instrumental in getting Bill Clinton to sign the SCHIP bill. </p>
	<p>I&#8217;m on the fence about whether she deserves to be credited for it. I mean, no questions asked, she knew it was a good idea, but then, a lot of people did. </p>
	<p>But she&#8217;s playing it up as part of her &#8220;experience&#8221; claims. And I&#8217;m willing to grant that she helped save it from a veto, and I grant that it was a good action for her to take. But I&#8217;m not sure you can call that &#8220;experience&#8221;. It&#8217;s one thing to haggle with lawmakers, and another to convince your spouse. </p>
	<p>It&#8217;s like (I have *NO* idea what charitable contributions the Clintons have made; I&#8217;m going to make up an example), if they made a charitable donation to food banks, I wouldn&#8217;t count that as &#8220;experience in helping feed the hungry&#8221;. But I wouldn&#8217;t deny that it proves that she and Bill *care* about the hungry, and that matters too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-530979</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-530979</guid>
					<description>hettie -- Hillary Clinton lied about her role in passing SCHIP. She claimed credit for it, but several lawmakers, staffers, and healthcare advocates involved in the issue say &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/03/14/clinton_role_in_health_program_disputed/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;she actually had little to do with it&lt;/a&gt;. 

And may I say it's pretty pathetic that the only other example you can come up with is something her HUSBAND did nearly several years ago.

And didn't I already ban you for insulting everyone else's intelligence? I believe I had. Well, you're banned again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>hettie &#8212; Hillary Clinton lied about her role in passing SCHIP. She claimed credit for it, but several lawmakers, staffers, and healthcare advocates involved in the issue say <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/03/14/clinton_role_in_health_program_disputed/" rel="nofollow">she actually had little to do with it</a>. </p>
	<p>And may I say it&#8217;s pretty pathetic that the only other example you can come up with is something her HUSBAND did nearly several years ago.</p>
	<p>And didn&#8217;t I already ban you for insulting everyone else&#8217;s intelligence? I believe I had. Well, you&#8217;re banned again.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hettie</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-530978</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-530978</guid>
					<description>My daughter is an elementary school principal, and she thinks  CHIP is a great program. Before CHIP children were coming to school sick and parents said they couldn't afford to take them to the doctor. Ask any elementary school nurse or principal if they believe CHIP is a huge achievement in the lives of American children.
I also know a personal trainer and her sister who is an OT. They tell about how their mother as a geriatric nurse in Arkansas went to Governor Clinton with her concerns about the quality of the lives of seniors in their state. She asked Clinton if he would support a statewide program to help improve the lives of seniors. He said he supported the idea and appointed her and Hillary to co-chair the committee that put the program together and got it started. They say their mother is proud of her work on that program and the improvement in the quality of life for seniors. They also say that their mother told them it would not have been possible without the tireless work and energy that Hillary put into the project. These are just two examples. I realize, however, that some people have been brainwashed and will never believe anything good about Hillary. That is their right, but please stop exulting (as he says in his campaign ads that are running in IN) a politician &quot;from the southside of Chicago.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My daughter is an elementary school principal, and she thinks  CHIP is a great program. Before CHIP children were coming to school sick and parents said they couldn&#8217;t afford to take them to the doctor. Ask any elementary school nurse or principal if they believe CHIP is a huge achievement in the lives of American children.<br />
I also know a personal trainer and her sister who is an OT. They tell about how their mother as a geriatric nurse in Arkansas went to Governor Clinton with her concerns about the quality of the lives of seniors in their state. She asked Clinton if he would support a statewide program to help improve the lives of seniors. He said he supported the idea and appointed her and Hillary to co-chair the committee that put the program together and got it started. They say their mother is proud of her work on that program and the improvement in the quality of life for seniors. They also say that their mother told them it would not have been possible without the tireless work and energy that Hillary put into the project. These are just two examples. I realize, however, that some people have been brainwashed and will never believe anything good about Hillary. That is their right, but please stop exulting (as he says in his campaign ads that are running in IN) a politician &#8220;from the southside of Chicago.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: felicity</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-530973</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-530973</guid>
					<description>'Cling to religion' within the context of the 'bitter' speech?   (April 28 'New Yorker,')  &quot;Obama was not saying that people acquire religious belief on account of worldly troubles.  He was saying that when such troubles appear insurmountable the already religious seek comfort and help from a higher power.&quot;

Hillary's take on the 'religious' part of the speech?   Not only is Obama an elitist, he's condescending and demeaning to those he considers beneath him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8216;Cling to religion&#8217; within the context of the &#8216;bitter&#8217; speech?   (April 28 &#8216;New Yorker,&#8217;)  &#8220;Obama was not saying that people acquire religious belief on account of worldly troubles.  He was saying that when such troubles appear insurmountable the already religious seek comfort and help from a higher power.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Hillary&#8217;s take on the &#8216;religious&#8217; part of the speech?   Not only is Obama an elitist, he&#8217;s condescending and demeaning to those he considers beneath him.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: grannyeagle</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-530971</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-530971</guid>
					<description>Hettie:

You ask why would anyone believe in Obama.  I can tell you why I choose to believe in him and you may think it's naive and silly, but here it is.  

I spent 25+ years as a psych nurse in addition to exploring Eastern ways of seeing the world in addition to learning to eliminate fear and shoot for the stars.  In my way of thinking, we (humans) need to have our head in the heavens while having our feet firmly planted in Mother Earth.  So, in my analysis, yes, it is trusting a lot to think Obama will do what he claims he will do but I'm willing to take that chance.  He comes across to me as a genuine person who does not let fear keep him from trying impossible things.  And I know he generates that feeling in others cause I feel it even through the TV screen.  All of his expressions, beginning with his smile, are natural and uplifting.  That is what we need.  Our problems begin in the spirit and can only be solved in the spirit.  On the other hand, Clinton appears regimented, her smile and expressions look forced and phony.  I'm sure there is a real person in there somewhere but she is too scared to let us know it. And if she gets elected, she definitely will not show it because that will prove to her that she got what she wanted by acting the way she does and she will continue. McCain is simply a military man, has been all his life and is not about to change at this point in his life.  This is his last chance to become something more than what he became in the Navy.  His father and grandfather were Admirals and I guess his career was over when he got captured and tortured.  So now he is angry but Commander-in-Chief sounds so much better than Admiral so he desperately wants that and probably will do anything he can to get it.

Yes, I got very jaded working in psych but that is my burden to overcome and I work on it every day.  I want a president I can feel proud of and look forward to seeing his face and listening to him speak.  I see that in Obama.  I know he is only human but I do believe that we need a LEADER and I have faith in him. This country needs to be turned around NOW, why should we wait until  he gets more experience. Just because Washington has always been the way it is doesn't mean it is supposed to be that way or that it has to go on being that way. If that makes me naive, so be it.  IMHO, you need to get out of the doldrums and think more positively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hettie:</p>
	<p>You ask why would anyone believe in Obama.  I can tell you why I choose to believe in him and you may think it&#8217;s naive and silly, but here it is.  </p>
	<p>I spent 25+ years as a psych nurse in addition to exploring Eastern ways of seeing the world in addition to learning to eliminate fear and shoot for the stars.  In my way of thinking, we (humans) need to have our head in the heavens while having our feet firmly planted in Mother Earth.  So, in my analysis, yes, it is trusting a lot to think Obama will do what he claims he will do but I&#8217;m willing to take that chance.  He comes across to me as a genuine person who does not let fear keep him from trying impossible things.  And I know he generates that feeling in others cause I feel it even through the TV screen.  All of his expressions, beginning with his smile, are natural and uplifting.  That is what we need.  Our problems begin in the spirit and can only be solved in the spirit.  On the other hand, Clinton appears regimented, her smile and expressions look forced and phony.  I&#8217;m sure there is a real person in there somewhere but she is too scared to let us know it. And if she gets elected, she definitely will not show it because that will prove to her that she got what she wanted by acting the way she does and she will continue. McCain is simply a military man, has been all his life and is not about to change at this point in his life.  This is his last chance to become something more than what he became in the Navy.  His father and grandfather were Admirals and I guess his career was over when he got captured and tortured.  So now he is angry but Commander-in-Chief sounds so much better than Admiral so he desperately wants that and probably will do anything he can to get it.</p>
	<p>Yes, I got very jaded working in psych but that is my burden to overcome and I work on it every day.  I want a president I can feel proud of and look forward to seeing his face and listening to him speak.  I see that in Obama.  I know he is only human but I do believe that we need a LEADER and I have faith in him. This country needs to be turned around NOW, why should we wait until  he gets more experience. Just because Washington has always been the way it is doesn&#8217;t mean it is supposed to be that way or that it has to go on being that way. If that makes me naive, so be it.  IMHO, you need to get out of the doldrums and think more positively.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-530965</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-530965</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;why would anyone believe a politician from Chicago who has done nothing to clean up the dirty politics in Chicago is going to clean up anything in Washington.&lt;/i&gt;

Obama was never an elected official of the city of Chicago, nor is he &quot;from&quot; Chicago. So your criticism is dishonest. You're learning well from Hillary Clinton, I see.

Obama was in the Illinois Senate, yes, and while he was there he was instrumental in reforming ethics and health care laws,  enhancing tax credits for low-income workers, and increasing subsidies for childcare, among other things.

However, Hillary Clinton has been in Washington for 15 years and has accomplished very little in all that time. She goes on and on about how she fights for people, but when you look at what she has actually accomplished, it doesn't add up to much. Little tweaks here and there; that's about it. Why should I believe she's going to do anything at all for anybody?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>why would anyone believe a politician from Chicago who has done nothing to clean up the dirty politics in Chicago is going to clean up anything in Washington.</i></p>
	<p>Obama was never an elected official of the city of Chicago, nor is he &#8220;from&#8221; Chicago. So your criticism is dishonest. You&#8217;re learning well from Hillary Clinton, I see.</p>
	<p>Obama was in the Illinois Senate, yes, and while he was there he was instrumental in reforming ethics and health care laws,  enhancing tax credits for low-income workers, and increasing subsidies for childcare, among other things.</p>
	<p>However, Hillary Clinton has been in Washington for 15 years and has accomplished very little in all that time. She goes on and on about how she fights for people, but when you look at what she has actually accomplished, it doesn&#8217;t add up to much. Little tweaks here and there; that&#8217;s about it. Why should I believe she&#8217;s going to do anything at all for anybody?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hettie</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-530964</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-530964</guid>
					<description>I never said there was anything wrong with the way our founding fathers set us our government. I think lobbyist perform an important function in our system of government. Even the Catholic Church employs lobbyists. What I am saying in my comment is not that the system needs changing, but why would anyone believe a politician from Chicago who has done nothing to clean up the dirty politics in Chicago is going to clean up anything in Washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I never said there was anything wrong with the way our founding fathers set us our government. I think lobbyist perform an important function in our system of government. Even the Catholic Church employs lobbyists. What I am saying in my comment is not that the system needs changing, but why would anyone believe a politician from Chicago who has done nothing to clean up the dirty politics in Chicago is going to clean up anything in Washington.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: maha</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-530963</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/04/23/more-jacksonian-than-jackson/#comment-530963</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;People are plain and simply naive to think a Chicago politician who certainly hasn’t shown that HE is any different from the Chicago politicians who have come before him is going to change Washington?&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, that's the Hillary Clinton message in a nutshell. Everything's bleeped up, it will never get any better, nobody's going to do shit to change it, so vote for Hillary Clinton. You can count on her not to do much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>People are plain and simply naive to think a Chicago politician who certainly hasn’t shown that HE is any different from the Chicago politicians who have come before him is going to change Washington?</i></p>
	<p>Yes, that&#8217;s the Hillary Clinton message in a nutshell. Everything&#8217;s bleeped up, it will never get any better, nobody&#8217;s going to do shit to change it, so vote for Hillary Clinton. You can count on her not to do much.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
