<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just Say No</title>
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/</link>
	<description>Exposing the ugly truths about the Bush Administration.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: biggerbox</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537867</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 03:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537867</guid>
					<description>What woman &lt;em&gt;would&lt;/em&gt; be an acceptable candidate? 

Well, how about one who hadn't acted like she deserved the nomination from the start, one who doesn't seem a little miffed that everyone doesn't automatically agree? How about one who can hire campaign staff as competent and populist as Obama's, instead of bozoes like Mark Penn and Terry McAuliffe, (apologies to Bozo and clowns everywhere.) How about one who didn't vote to authorize the stupidest military misadventure in American history? How about one who could, after positioning herself for the job for close to a decade, was actually able to convince an overwhelming majority of the party that she really &lt;em&gt;was&lt;/em&gt; the one they wanted? (I mean, come on. It shouldn't even be close, given how long she's been planning on this campaign...) 

Seriously, the idea that there couldn't be a stronger female candidate than Hillary strikes me as the most bizarre sexism. It's not about her being a woman, it's about her not being as good a politician as she thinks she is.

As for the veep slot, the traditional way one applies for that job is to end one's campaign as soon as it's clear you can't win without extraordinary measures, and to give your endorsement to the one you want to run with. NOT by continuing to slam the most likely nominee, and sending protesters to the Rules Committee meeting to game the system. I think Bill Clinton is a real smart guy, but sometimes he is completely idiotic, and this is another one of those times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What woman <em>would</em> be an acceptable candidate? </p>
	<p>Well, how about one who hadn&#8217;t acted like she deserved the nomination from the start, one who doesn&#8217;t seem a little miffed that everyone doesn&#8217;t automatically agree? How about one who can hire campaign staff as competent and populist as Obama&#8217;s, instead of bozoes like Mark Penn and Terry McAuliffe, (apologies to Bozo and clowns everywhere.) How about one who didn&#8217;t vote to authorize the stupidest military misadventure in American history? How about one who could, after positioning herself for the job for close to a decade, was actually able to convince an overwhelming majority of the party that she really <em>was</em> the one they wanted? (I mean, come on. It shouldn&#8217;t even be close, given how long she&#8217;s been planning on this campaign&#8230;) </p>
	<p>Seriously, the idea that there couldn&#8217;t be a stronger female candidate than Hillary strikes me as the most bizarre sexism. It&#8217;s not about her being a woman, it&#8217;s about her not being as good a politician as she thinks she is.</p>
	<p>As for the veep slot, the traditional way one applies for that job is to end one&#8217;s campaign as soon as it&#8217;s clear you can&#8217;t win without extraordinary measures, and to give your endorsement to the one you want to run with. NOT by continuing to slam the most likely nominee, and sending protesters to the Rules Committee meeting to game the system. I think Bill Clinton is a real smart guy, but sometimes he is completely idiotic, and this is another one of those times.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Swami</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537866</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 01:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537866</guid>
					<description>Ha, McCain kicked Hagee and his highly coveted political endorsement to the curb. &quot;Get thee behind me Satan!&quot;?  Gee, I wonder why McCain found it offensive that Hagee said Hitler was doing God's will in conducting the holocaust? It amazes me that McCain would turn from the truth of God's holy word for the sake of political advantage. Weep for the Daughter of Zion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ha, McCain kicked Hagee and his highly coveted political endorsement to the curb. &#8220;Get thee behind me Satan!&#8221;?  Gee, I wonder why McCain found it offensive that Hagee said Hitler was doing God&#8217;s will in conducting the holocaust? It amazes me that McCain would turn from the truth of God&#8217;s holy word for the sake of political advantage. Weep for the Daughter of Zion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: uncledad</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537863</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537863</guid>
					<description>I still stand by my theory thatMcCain, Hill and Bubba have signed a deal with bu$hco to let all the past indecresions (umm understatement) remain uninvestigated. If she wants on the ticket it is only to have the best position to undermine Obamas chance of winning. I hope Obama is tough enough to keep her at arms length, oh and don't turn your back!

The political establishment aint just afraid of Obama, they are afraid of the past. It haunts them and they won't stop running from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I still stand by my theory thatMcCain, Hill and Bubba have signed a deal with bu$hco to let all the past indecresions (umm understatement) remain uninvestigated. If she wants on the ticket it is only to have the best position to undermine Obamas chance of winning. I hope Obama is tough enough to keep her at arms length, oh and don&#8217;t turn your back!</p>
	<p>The political establishment aint just afraid of Obama, they are afraid of the past. It haunts them and they won&#8217;t stop running from it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mikefromtexas</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537856</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537856</guid>
					<description>Also keep in mind that this is a fight to the death for the DLC. After how badly they have botched her campaign, why would anyone ever hire Penn, Wolfson or any of these other morons again. It's more than just the Clintons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Also keep in mind that this is a fight to the death for the DLC. After how badly they have botched her campaign, why would anyone ever hire Penn, Wolfson or any of these other morons again. It&#8217;s more than just the Clintons.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Swami</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537855</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537855</guid>
					<description>Character is the most important quality of leadership. It's easier to build experience than to rehabilitate a flawed character. I hear that Obama seeks imput from all quarters because he understands the value of counsel that doesn't tickle the ears. Unlike assholes like Bush, or McCain who demean people of contrary opinions because they think their own status and power imparts some sort of infallability. Hillary is no different.. she doesn't understand the power of humility. you can't benefit from other peoples knowledge and experience when you've got all the answers yourself.

 Obama is.. &quot;yes we can&quot;, &quot;si, se puede&quot;..inclusive, offering us a sense of empowerment rather than coming off as a big daddy,messiah, decider, commander guy, sheepherder. I want somebody who at least recognizes that my voice should have a place at the table of the American dream. McCain and Clinton won't want to know me after they've gotten my vote. They'll love me all the way into the voting booth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Character is the most important quality of leadership. It&#8217;s easier to build experience than to rehabilitate a flawed character. I hear that Obama seeks imput from all quarters because he understands the value of counsel that doesn&#8217;t tickle the ears. Unlike assholes like Bush, or McCain who demean people of contrary opinions because they think their own status and power imparts some sort of infallability. Hillary is no different.. she doesn&#8217;t understand the power of humility. you can&#8217;t benefit from other peoples knowledge and experience when you&#8217;ve got all the answers yourself.</p>
	<p> Obama is.. &#8220;yes we can&#8221;, &#8220;si, se puede&#8221;..inclusive, offering us a sense of empowerment rather than coming off as a big daddy,messiah, decider, commander guy, sheepherder. I want somebody who at least recognizes that my voice should have a place at the table of the American dream. McCain and Clinton won&#8217;t want to know me after they&#8217;ve gotten my vote. They&#8217;ll love me all the way into the voting booth.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537853</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537853</guid>
					<description>As long-standing candidate for the Democratic nomination, she certainly deserves, and Obama has alluded to, consideration for the second place on the ticket.  That's all.  On the basis of her reluctance to cede the nomination to Obama, that we may be looking at an attempt to have the courts overturn the primary/convention results a la Bush 2000.  It will get nasty, my friends.

A joke heard on a local radio this morning: A reporter asked Bill Clinton, &quot;where does Hillary find the strength to continue fighting?&quot;  Bill replied, &quot;Our marriage is none of your business.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As long-standing candidate for the Democratic nomination, she certainly deserves, and Obama has alluded to, consideration for the second place on the ticket.  That&#8217;s all.  On the basis of her reluctance to cede the nomination to Obama, that we may be looking at an attempt to have the courts overturn the primary/convention results a la Bush 2000.  It will get nasty, my friends.</p>
	<p>A joke heard on a local radio this morning: A reporter asked Bill Clinton, &#8220;where does Hillary find the strength to continue fighting?&#8221;  Bill replied, &#8220;Our marriage is none of your business.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: moonbat</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537852</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537852</guid>
					<description>In a way, it's good that this primary season has dragged on so interminably long - because it's shown us - and I hate to say this - just how crazed Billary can get when push comes to shove. They say power corrupts, and I'm thinking this is what 8 years at the top of the world did to these people - they think they are owed this election. They apparently so very badly miss living at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, and will say or do anything to regain it. 

I wouldn't want either of them near any levers of power. Chris Dodd is my choice for Senate Majority Leader, and he can't take the reins of this job from Harry Reid any time too soon. It would be grand if Bill at least could morph into Jimmy Carter, Nobel Prize Winner, which could still happen, but both Clintons have sadly become caricatures of themselves this year. I'm hoping that Obama wins not just because he's the better candidate IMO, but because the Clintons need a good dose of humble pie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>In a way, it&#8217;s good that this primary season has dragged on so interminably long - because it&#8217;s shown us - and I hate to say this - just how crazed Billary can get when push comes to shove. They say power corrupts, and I&#8217;m thinking this is what 8 years at the top of the world did to these people - they think they are owed this election. They apparently so very badly miss living at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, and will say or do anything to regain it. </p>
	<p>I wouldn&#8217;t want either of them near any levers of power. Chris Dodd is my choice for Senate Majority Leader, and he can&#8217;t take the reins of this job from Harry Reid any time too soon. It would be grand if Bill at least could morph into Jimmy Carter, Nobel Prize Winner, which could still happen, but both Clintons have sadly become caricatures of themselves this year. I&#8217;m hoping that Obama wins not just because he&#8217;s the better candidate IMO, but because the Clintons need a good dose of humble pie.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Hayden</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537851</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537851</guid>
					<description>One can claim to promote unity just as one can claim to be opposed to the war on Iraq.

But everywhere I look, I see dead people.

While Obama campaigns in Florida and Michigan so Rome can be united, someone asks for the role of understudy? Not to worry... Brutus &lt;i&gt;always&lt;/i&gt; accessorizes with daggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>One can claim to promote unity just as one can claim to be opposed to the war on Iraq.</p>
	<p>But everywhere I look, I see dead people.</p>
	<p>While Obama campaigns in Florida and Michigan so Rome can be united, someone asks for the role of understudy? Not to worry&#8230; Brutus <i>always</i> accessorizes with daggers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: fidelio</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537850</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/05/22/just-say-no/#comment-537850</guid>
					<description>You know, the thing that turned me dubious about Clinton's capacity to handle the job was the shortcomings of her staff, because if they're picked for loyalty, rather than capability, and she keeps them around even when they mess up and so screw her over--will she keep doing that as POTUS? Seems to me we've had enough of that aleady/

VPOTUS may seem more prestigious, but I have to say I think the smarter choice would be for her to push for Senate Majority Leader, if there's any chance of her getting it. She'd have all the power she could stand, for as long as she shows she can handle the job, and I think it would make just as many heads explode.

Just because the Right made their lives a living hell during Bill's terms does not entitle the Clintons to a do-over, and I keep hearing more and more things that sound like that what some feel she's supposed to get out of this election.

Also, for better or worse, the 1960s are over, and I'd like a president who gets that. I'm just sayin'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You know, the thing that turned me dubious about Clinton&#8217;s capacity to handle the job was the shortcomings of her staff, because if they&#8217;re picked for loyalty, rather than capability, and she keeps them around even when they mess up and so screw her over&#8211;will she keep doing that as POTUS? Seems to me we&#8217;ve had enough of that aleady/</p>
	<p>VPOTUS may seem more prestigious, but I have to say I think the smarter choice would be for her to push for Senate Majority Leader, if there&#8217;s any chance of her getting it. She&#8217;d have all the power she could stand, for as long as she shows she can handle the job, and I think it would make just as many heads explode.</p>
	<p>Just because the Right made their lives a living hell during Bill&#8217;s terms does not entitle the Clintons to a do-over, and I keep hearing more and more things that sound like that what some feel she&#8217;s supposed to get out of this election.</p>
	<p>Also, for better or worse, the 1960s are over, and I&#8217;d like a president who gets that. I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
