<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Random News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mahablog.com/2008/07/28/random-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/07/28/random-news/</link>
	<description>Making the World Safe for Liberalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:41:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the exile</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/07/28/random-news/comment-page-1/#comment-545801</link>
		<dc:creator>the exile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=2648#comment-545801</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been leaving this comment everywhere, so forgive me, but if a muslim shot up a church and then jihad literature was found in his house, the organizations that published the jihad literature would be put on the FBI&#039;s terroist list and their assets would be seized.  Either Savage and Hannity should face the same legal consequences, or islamic organizations that support jihad without actually engaging in violence should similarly be protected by our free speech laws. It&#039;s about time the borderline terrorist right stopped being able to play this double standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been leaving this comment everywhere, so forgive me, but if a muslim shot up a church and then jihad literature was found in his house, the organizations that published the jihad literature would be put on the FBI&#8217;s terroist list and their assets would be seized.  Either Savage and Hannity should face the same legal consequences, or islamic organizations that support jihad without actually engaging in violence should similarly be protected by our free speech laws. It&#8217;s about time the borderline terrorist right stopped being able to play this double standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphael</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2008/07/28/random-news/comment-page-1/#comment-545792</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=2648#comment-545792</guid>
		<description>&quot;until the accused is thoroughly evaluated it’s a tad premature to call what he did a hate crime, or terrorism. He might be psychotic, for example.&quot;

I think a lot of political hate crimes are committed by people with serious mental issues (allthough a lot of others are committed by generally well-adjusted people, too). Doesn&#039;t stop those crimes from being political hate crimes, IMO.

Anyway, best wishes to the survivors, and cudos to the church members who overpowered him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;until the accused is thoroughly evaluated it’s a tad premature to call what he did a hate crime, or terrorism. He might be psychotic, for example.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think a lot of political hate crimes are committed by people with serious mental issues (allthough a lot of others are committed by generally well-adjusted people, too). Doesn&#8217;t stop those crimes from being political hate crimes, IMO.</p>
<p>Anyway, best wishes to the survivors, and cudos to the church members who overpowered him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
