<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surgical Bypass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/24/surgical-bypass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/24/surgical-bypass/</link>
	<description>Making the World Safe for Liberalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:04:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: erinyes</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/24/surgical-bypass/comment-page-1/#comment-624728</link>
		<dc:creator>erinyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=6989#comment-624728</guid>
		<description>Waxman kicks ass! 
I&#039;d hate to have him as an enemy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waxman kicks ass!<br />
I&#8217;d hate to have him as an enemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c u n d gulag</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/24/surgical-bypass/comment-page-1/#comment-624727</link>
		<dc:creator>c u n d gulag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=6989#comment-624727</guid>
		<description>Oh, and Badtux, love your site:-)  
Maybe you know.  When will Canadians switch from their beloved lumberboots to jackboots?  Those of us in the United States of Canadain Lebensraum want to know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Badtux, love your site:-)<br />
Maybe you know.  When will Canadians switch from their beloved lumberboots to jackboots?  Those of us in the United States of Canadain Lebensraum want to know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c u n d gulag</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/24/surgical-bypass/comment-page-1/#comment-624726</link>
		<dc:creator>c u n d gulag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=6989#comment-624726</guid>
		<description>Sowell is one of the dimmest bulbs on the Pundit Broadway.
I can summarize any of his columns in one sentence, courtesy of Groucho Marx:  If a Democrat proposes it, &#039;whatever it is, I&#039;m against it!&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sowell is one of the dimmest bulbs on the Pundit Broadway.<br />
I can summarize any of his columns in one sentence, courtesy of Groucho Marx:  If a Democrat proposes it, &#8216;whatever it is, I&#8217;m against it!&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porlock Junior</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/24/surgical-bypass/comment-page-1/#comment-624709</link>
		<dc:creator>Porlock Junior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 04:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=6989#comment-624709</guid>
		<description>Wow, that was strange. From the preamble, I went into Sowell&#039;s piece with the creepy idea that I was about to see him writing something &lt;i&gt;true&lt;/i&gt;. Fortunately he came through in good form, and the planets are still in their orbits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that was strange. From the preamble, I went into Sowell&#8217;s piece with the creepy idea that I was about to see him writing something <i>true</i>. Fortunately he came through in good form, and the planets are still in their orbits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/24/surgical-bypass/comment-page-1/#comment-624708</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 01:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=6989#comment-624708</guid>
		<description>Follow the money: &quot;Congressional investigators found that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/opinion/29mon1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;three big insurers canceled about 20,000 individual policies over a five-year period&lt;/a&gt; — allowing them to avoid paying more than $300 million in medical claims.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow the money: &#8220;Congressional investigators found that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/opinion/29mon1.html" rel="nofollow">three big insurers canceled about 20,000 individual policies over a five-year period</a> — allowing them to avoid paying more than $300 million in medical claims.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/24/surgical-bypass/comment-page-1/#comment-624707</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 01:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=6989#comment-624707</guid>
		<description>Follow the money: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/12/07/unitedhealth-ceo-mcguires-gives-back-620-million/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Corporate-medical-industry crook loots $1.42 BILLION out of the health-care system&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and after getting caught &lt;i&gt;only&lt;/i&gt; gets to keep $800 MILLION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow the money: <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/12/07/unitedhealth-ceo-mcguires-gives-back-620-million/" rel="nofollow"><b>Corporate-medical-industry crook loots $1.42 BILLION out of the health-care system</b></a> and after getting caught <i>only</i> gets to keep $800 MILLION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bil bush</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/24/surgical-bypass/comment-page-1/#comment-624703</link>
		<dc:creator>bil bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=6989#comment-624703</guid>
		<description>P.S.  I can spell my own name, I just can&#039;t type it.  bill bush</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  I can spell my own name, I just can&#8217;t type it.  bill bush</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bil bush</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/24/surgical-bypass/comment-page-1/#comment-624702</link>
		<dc:creator>bil bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=6989#comment-624702</guid>
		<description>Follow the money!!! It is just like the financial bubble -- lots of money at the top, and lots of people left with with zip at the bottom!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow the money!!! It is just like the financial bubble &#8212; lots of money at the top, and lots of people left with with zip at the bottom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moonbat</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/24/surgical-bypass/comment-page-1/#comment-624698</link>
		<dc:creator>moonbat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=6989#comment-624698</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/07/24-11&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;More dirt on the Blue Dogs&lt;/a&gt;, and their highly selective fiscal conservativism:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
...Certainly the Blue Dogs are astute players of the game, their power enhanced by their willingness to echo Republican rhetoric while enjoying the perks and prerogatives of Democratic power. But this is a cynical group indeed, whose reputation for fiscal probity is grossly inflated -- and whose loyalty to corporate interests, over and above the priorities of their party and the welfare of their constituents, is a darkening stain. 

What supposedly troubles the Blue Dogs these days is the estimated cost of healthcare reform. By their calculations, a trillion dollars over 10 years represents an unsustainable expenditure, even if the program succeeds in providing universal quality coverage. The chairman of the Blue Dog healthcare task force, Rep. Mike Ross, D-Ark., has repeatedly threatened to kill any reform bill that increases the deficit. &quot;We have to take steps to hold healthcare costs to the rate of inflation, or we will never balance our federal budget again, and health insurance costs will continue to become less and less affordable for the American people,&quot; he said last week. 

Holding healthcare costs to the rate of inflation is a laudable if unlikely goal for Ross and his fellow Blue Dogs, but the simple fact is that their concern over costs and deficits is highly selective -- and their claim to fiscal conservatism is utterly unearned. That should be instantly obvious to anyone who glances at the Mike Ross House Web site, where all of his puffery about holding down the deficit and saving taxpayer money gives way to his boasting about the pork he brings home to Arkansas....

Chances are that the river and port improvement projects forming the bulk of the Ross earmarks are perfectly legitimate -- and that may well be true of most of the earmarks that the other Blue Dogs regularly grab for their home districts. But who knows? When talking to Washington reporters they proclaim their single-minded dedication to fiscal prudence; when talking to the home folks, they brag about their skill at pork barreling. So as sentinels of the public treasury, they have about as little credibility as the Republicans who used to control Congress. 

If the Blue Dogs were truly worried about wasteful spending, they might use their influence to curb the outrageous looting of the federal Treasury by defense contractors, which remains by far the largest drain on the public purse. They might have spoken out against the brazen theft of billions of dollars by private contractors in Iraq, whose thievery harmed troops as well as taxpayers. They might have cautioned against squandering hundreds of billions of dollars on programs that don&#039;t work and probably never will, from the F-22 jet fighterBallistic Missile Defense System. to the 

Yet with precious few exceptions, the Blue Dogs whisper nary a word against military extravagance. If they are like Ross, they mindlessly endorse the expansion of virtually any and all military programs, simply because some of those dollars end up in their districts....Their silence is regularly shamed, or should be, by the efforts of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., an actual conservative who at least tries to trim around the fattiest edges of the defense budget. 

If the Blue Dogs aren&#039;t really worried by wasteful spending, then what do they find so troubling about the prospect of change in healthcare? The unflattering answer, which may be found in a study just released by the Center for Public Integrity, is money. Corporate interests are showering dollars on the Blue Dogs and their political action committees in record amounts....These pooches heel when the lobbyists whistle. 

But why would we expect anything else from them? 

Let&#039;s recall that the founder of the House Blue Dog caucus -- and still a guiding mentor to its members -- is Billy Tauzin, a Democrat from Louisiana who helped start the group in 1994 and then jumped ship to the Republicans a year later. Just months before he retired from Congress in 2005, he pushed through the Medicare prescription drug bill, guaranteeing hundreds of billions in waste and enormous profits for the drug companies....
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
As soon as he left Congress, Tauzin became the chief lobbyist for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, where he makes sure the Blue Dogs never get carried away with any of that rhetoric about fiscal prudence or holding down costs -- by writing generous checks. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/07/24-11" rel="nofollow">More dirt on the Blue Dogs</a>, and their highly selective fiscal conservativism:</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8230;Certainly the Blue Dogs are astute players of the game, their power enhanced by their willingness to echo Republican rhetoric while enjoying the perks and prerogatives of Democratic power. But this is a cynical group indeed, whose reputation for fiscal probity is grossly inflated &#8212; and whose loyalty to corporate interests, over and above the priorities of their party and the welfare of their constituents, is a darkening stain. </p>
<p>What supposedly troubles the Blue Dogs these days is the estimated cost of healthcare reform. By their calculations, a trillion dollars over 10 years represents an unsustainable expenditure, even if the program succeeds in providing universal quality coverage. The chairman of the Blue Dog healthcare task force, Rep. Mike Ross, D-Ark., has repeatedly threatened to kill any reform bill that increases the deficit. &#8220;We have to take steps to hold healthcare costs to the rate of inflation, or we will never balance our federal budget again, and health insurance costs will continue to become less and less affordable for the American people,&#8221; he said last week. </p>
<p>Holding healthcare costs to the rate of inflation is a laudable if unlikely goal for Ross and his fellow Blue Dogs, but the simple fact is that their concern over costs and deficits is highly selective &#8212; and their claim to fiscal conservatism is utterly unearned. That should be instantly obvious to anyone who glances at the Mike Ross House Web site, where all of his puffery about holding down the deficit and saving taxpayer money gives way to his boasting about the pork he brings home to Arkansas&#8230;.</p>
<p>Chances are that the river and port improvement projects forming the bulk of the Ross earmarks are perfectly legitimate &#8212; and that may well be true of most of the earmarks that the other Blue Dogs regularly grab for their home districts. But who knows? When talking to Washington reporters they proclaim their single-minded dedication to fiscal prudence; when talking to the home folks, they brag about their skill at pork barreling. So as sentinels of the public treasury, they have about as little credibility as the Republicans who used to control Congress. </p>
<p>If the Blue Dogs were truly worried about wasteful spending, they might use their influence to curb the outrageous looting of the federal Treasury by defense contractors, which remains by far the largest drain on the public purse. They might have spoken out against the brazen theft of billions of dollars by private contractors in Iraq, whose thievery harmed troops as well as taxpayers. They might have cautioned against squandering hundreds of billions of dollars on programs that don&#8217;t work and probably never will, from the F-22 jet fighterBallistic Missile Defense System. to the </p>
<p>Yet with precious few exceptions, the Blue Dogs whisper nary a word against military extravagance. If they are like Ross, they mindlessly endorse the expansion of virtually any and all military programs, simply because some of those dollars end up in their districts&#8230;.Their silence is regularly shamed, or should be, by the efforts of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., an actual conservative who at least tries to trim around the fattiest edges of the defense budget. </p>
<p>If the Blue Dogs aren&#8217;t really worried by wasteful spending, then what do they find so troubling about the prospect of change in healthcare? The unflattering answer, which may be found in a study just released by the Center for Public Integrity, is money. Corporate interests are showering dollars on the Blue Dogs and their political action committees in record amounts&#8230;.These pooches heel when the lobbyists whistle. </p>
<p>But why would we expect anything else from them? </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s recall that the founder of the House Blue Dog caucus &#8212; and still a guiding mentor to its members &#8212; is Billy Tauzin, a Democrat from Louisiana who helped start the group in 1994 and then jumped ship to the Republicans a year later. Just months before he retired from Congress in 2005, he pushed through the Medicare prescription drug bill, guaranteeing hundreds of billions in waste and enormous profits for the drug companies&#8230;.
</p></blockquote>
<p>As soon as he left Congress, Tauzin became the chief lobbyist for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, where he makes sure the Blue Dogs never get carried away with any of that rhetoric about fiscal prudence or holding down costs &#8212; by writing generous checks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeany</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/24/surgical-bypass/comment-page-1/#comment-624697</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=6989#comment-624697</guid>
		<description>When did we Americans get to love the notion of blackballing so much? Health insurance companies blackball whole categories of illness, they blackball covering women who might be fertile. 

Now certain groups of elected representatives can assemble behind a label and blackball legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did we Americans get to love the notion of blackballing so much? Health insurance companies blackball whole categories of illness, they blackball covering women who might be fertile. </p>
<p>Now certain groups of elected representatives can assemble behind a label and blackball legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
