<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health Care Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/27/health-care-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/27/health-care-updates/</link>
	<description>Making the World Safe for Liberalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:46:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: News Reference</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/27/health-care-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-624803</link>
		<dc:creator>News Reference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=7044#comment-624803</guid>
		<description>The WashingtonPost&#039;s David Broder has been a Rovian concern troll for years.

But it&#039;s excellent to read Paul Krugman call out Broder on specifically torpedoing progressive legislation in a way that repudiates Broder&#039;s concern trolling about costs: It&#039;s a front for Broder to push right wing policies.

...

As for the question: &lt;i&gt;&quot;Why is it that Blue Dogs will act like Republicans...&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Answer: &quot;Blue Dogs&quot; are moderate to conservative Republicans that don&#039;t fit in the current right wing extremist Republican Party.

Some &quot;Blue Dogs&quot; are usually (a little) better than the Republican that might replace them and occasionally reflect the &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; of their constituencies (if not those constituencies best interests).

Unfortunately, many (though not all) &quot;Blue Dogs&quot; are just corporate shills that make the larger Democratic Party look bad.

&lt;b&gt;There are a good number of good Progressive Democratic leaders in Congress, but they are still a minority within the Democratic Party&lt;/b&gt;. And while &quot;Progressive&quot; Dems might outnumber &quot;Blue Dogs&quot; there are still a good number of &quot;middle Dems&quot; to contend with.

Until Progressive voters learn to distinguish good Progressive Democratic leaders from &quot;Blue Dogs&quot; Democrats and the middle Dems and stop blaming the larger &quot;Democratic Party&quot; for things done by those &quot;Blue Dogs&quot;, many middle Dems will not feel they have the support needed to stand up for Progressive causes.

And in fact, because many Progressive&#039;s are so quick to blame and attack and generalize about what constitutes the &quot;Democratic Party&quot;, even while there are excellent people in it doing good work, the feelings by the middle Dems that they aren&#039;t being supported isn&#039;t off the mark.

If you want to be helpful, target the &quot;Blue Dems&quot;, celebrate the Progressive Dems, and work to support the &quot;middle Dems&quot; to feel confident that they can support Progressive legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WashingtonPost&#8217;s David Broder has been a Rovian concern troll for years.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s excellent to read Paul Krugman call out Broder on specifically torpedoing progressive legislation in a way that repudiates Broder&#8217;s concern trolling about costs: It&#8217;s a front for Broder to push right wing policies.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>As for the question: <i>&#8220;Why is it that Blue Dogs will act like Republicans&#8230;&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Answer: &#8220;Blue Dogs&#8221; are moderate to conservative Republicans that don&#8217;t fit in the current right wing extremist Republican Party.</p>
<p>Some &#8220;Blue Dogs&#8221; are usually (a little) better than the Republican that might replace them and occasionally reflect the <i>will</i> of their constituencies (if not those constituencies best interests).</p>
<p>Unfortunately, many (though not all) &#8220;Blue Dogs&#8221; are just corporate shills that make the larger Democratic Party look bad.</p>
<p><b>There are a good number of good Progressive Democratic leaders in Congress, but they are still a minority within the Democratic Party</b>. And while &#8220;Progressive&#8221; Dems might outnumber &#8220;Blue Dogs&#8221; there are still a good number of &#8220;middle Dems&#8221; to contend with.</p>
<p>Until Progressive voters learn to distinguish good Progressive Democratic leaders from &#8220;Blue Dogs&#8221; Democrats and the middle Dems and stop blaming the larger &#8220;Democratic Party&#8221; for things done by those &#8220;Blue Dogs&#8221;, many middle Dems will not feel they have the support needed to stand up for Progressive causes.</p>
<p>And in fact, because many Progressive&#8217;s are so quick to blame and attack and generalize about what constitutes the &#8220;Democratic Party&#8221;, even while there are excellent people in it doing good work, the feelings by the middle Dems that they aren&#8217;t being supported isn&#8217;t off the mark.</p>
<p>If you want to be helpful, target the &#8220;Blue Dems&#8221;, celebrate the Progressive Dems, and work to support the &#8220;middle Dems&#8221; to feel confident that they can support Progressive legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/27/health-care-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-624802</link>
		<dc:creator>s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=7044#comment-624802</guid>
		<description>I am worried.  Everything I have heard indicates them delaying until after the break means they won&#039;t get it done, or will not be working for the people when they do.  This is just time to shore up commitments from the insurance companies and drug companies.  I guess they want to make sure they will get the big bucks before ignoring the  will of the people.  If that happens, I will be looking for someone who will represent me, not their pocket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am worried.  Everything I have heard indicates them delaying until after the break means they won&#8217;t get it done, or will not be working for the people when they do.  This is just time to shore up commitments from the insurance companies and drug companies.  I guess they want to make sure they will get the big bucks before ignoring the  will of the people.  If that happens, I will be looking for someone who will represent me, not their pocket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c u n d gulag</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/27/health-care-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-624799</link>
		<dc:creator>c u n d gulag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=7044#comment-624799</guid>
		<description>Whoever got the idea that government was created to help people?  Jesus, what an outmoded idea that is!
Everyone know that those who govern are there to be helped along by their corporate allies.  Those corporate allies pay for advertizing that make their elected official look like they care about the average citizen.  When the propaganda is absorbed and the asshole is re-elected, this helps to forward whatever agenda the corporation has. 
And your friendly neighborhood MSM pundit?  He/she is there to sugarcoat everything so that the bitter medicine (which is the only kind we can afford) is swallowed in a digestible form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever got the idea that government was created to help people?  Jesus, what an outmoded idea that is!<br />
Everyone know that those who govern are there to be helped along by their corporate allies.  Those corporate allies pay for advertizing that make their elected official look like they care about the average citizen.  When the propaganda is absorbed and the asshole is re-elected, this helps to forward whatever agenda the corporation has.<br />
And your friendly neighborhood MSM pundit?  He/she is there to sugarcoat everything so that the bitter medicine (which is the only kind we can afford) is swallowed in a digestible form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buckyblue</title>
		<link>http://www.mahablog.com/2009/07/27/health-care-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-624797</link>
		<dc:creator>buckyblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahablog.com/?p=7044#comment-624797</guid>
		<description>Why is it that Blue Dogs will act like Republicans but you never see Red Dogs acting like Democrats. Don&#039;t they get it, the country has given the course of government over to the Democratic agenda,(much more so than Republicans ever had) and yet they still act like scared little boys. Grow a pair and get it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that Blue Dogs will act like Republicans but you never see Red Dogs acting like Democrats. Don&#8217;t they get it, the country has given the course of government over to the Democratic agenda,(much more so than Republicans ever had) and yet they still act like scared little boys. Grow a pair and get it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
