Trump vs. Merkel

-->
Trump Maladministration

The meeting between the so-called president and German Chancellor Angela Merkel seemed a bit prickly to me, although of course I wasn’t there. Germans were upset that the so-called president failed to shake her hand at one point. But that seems the least of it.

Trump apparently believes that Germany is screwing the U.S. in trade deals.

Trump told Merkel and the press that Germany had gotten the better end of the stick in trade deals with the US in the past and that he was looking to rectify that situation.

“The negotiators for Germany have done a far better job than the negotiators for the United States,” he said. “But hopefully we can even it out.”

We know what “even it out” means, and it is an absurd notion. It means negotiating a bilateral trade deal with Germany and somehow ignoring the rest of the rest of the European Union.

Merkel explained to Trump that  “The European Union is negotiating those agreements for all of the member states,” but whether he grasped that is hard to tell

Of course, what Merkel says about it doesn’t matter in a White House that is gripped by the delusion that Germany can just tell the EU to take a hike — at least, it will be gripped by this for as long as that policy is directed by Trump’s trade head, Peter Navarro.

Navarro, in a much-derided speech this month, said Germany “uses the argument” of being in the eurozone to avoid trade deals with the US, and that because of this Germany would be “one of the most difficult trade deficits we’re going to have to deal with.”

Navarro has gone as far as to accuse Germany of being a currency manipulator for using the euro. He thinks that because countries with weaker economies than Germany’s are factored into the euro’s value, Germany can sell its manufactured goods more cheaply than it could if it had its own currency.

Obviously, that’s not currency manipulation. That’s just the reality of the euro’s makeup.

But it means Merkel faces a scenario in which the president of the United States and his top trade adviser think one of their closest and most important allies is lying to them about its need to respect the EU. Trump and Navarro think this is a choice Germany is making about the US, not an obligation that is part of the fabric of its political and economic systems.

Peter Navarro is director of the National Trade Council, a newly formed bureaucratic thingie in the executive branch somewhere. This is from an article about him:

It is sometimes difficult to get a detailed, direct answer from President Trump and his surrogates on their economic policy.

During the campaign he slid past substance by making sweeping claims of how, under a Trump administration, the US would ‘”win bigly” and “stop being taken advantage of.”

Those pronouncements continue.

But luckily there is one voice coming from the White House that clearly articulates the direction in which it wants this country to head economically. That voice belongs to Peter Navarro, the head of Trump’s newly formed National Trade Council.

Over the past few weeks, Navarro has given a number of interviews that explain the administration’s propensity for victimhood, an obsession with Germany, and a deep-seated desire to change the face of the American economy as we know it.

All these factors have contributed to growing fears that this administration will start a trade war with any of the countries it has scapegoated — Mexico, China, or, yes, now Germany.

I missed this, but in January Trump suggested a 35 percent tariff on BMWs imported into the U.S., and Germans probably are still pissed about that —

Germany’s deputy chancellor and minister for the economy, Sigmar Gabriel, said on Monday morning that a tax on German imports would lead to a “bad awakening” among US carmakers since they were reliant on transatlantic supply chains.

“I believe BMW’s biggest factory is already in the US, in Spartanburg [South Carolina],” Gabriel, leader of the centre-left Social Democratic party, told the Bild newspaper in a video interview.

“The US car industry would have a bad awakening if all the supply parts that aren’t being built in the US were to suddenly come with a 35% tariff. I believe it would make the US car industry weaker, worse and above all more expensive. I would wait and see what the Congress has to say about that, which is mostly full of people who want the opposite of Trump.”

In an interview with Bild and the Times, the US president-elect had indicated that he would aim to realign the “out of balance” car trade between Germany and the US. “If you go down Fifth Avenue everyone has a Mercedes Benz in front of his house, isn’t that the case?” he said. “How many Chevrolets do you see in Germany? Not very many, maybe none at all … it’s a one-way street.”

Asked what Trump could do to make sure German customers bought more American cars, Gabriel said: “Build better cars.”

Trump was never a manufacturing guy, so he doesn’t understand supply chains. And he doesn’t understand how the EU works, and neither does his trade guy, Navarro. What else doesn’t he know?

After tweeting from Mar-a-Lago that he had a GREAT meeting with Angela Merkel, in spite of what the FAKE NEWS said, he stepped in more doo doo.

Um, what is he talking about? I didn’t think the U.S. collected money to run NATO. 

And, of course, it doesn’t. Nobody owes NATO money. Nobody owes the U.S. anything on behalf of NATO. The issue is that NATO members commit to spend 2 percent of their gross domestic product on defense, and most of them don’t. Germany spends 1.2 percent, although Merkel has said that will increase. But framing this issue as if Germany is somehow victimizing the United States is just  … weird.

See also Oops, he did it again: Donald Trump just can’t stop himself from blurting out state secrets.

Share Button
5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. c u n d gulag  •  Mar 18, 2017 @11:05 pm

    Oy!
    I just can’t……..

    I guess that all I can say, is that in every marriage, in every culture, there’always a Crazy Uncle Boris (or Manny, Don, Ed, Stan, Ming, Ichiru, etc…).
    It’s just that we happened to elect that assclown President.

    I would lay money, that the average drunk at the end of the bar, is smarter, wiser, more intelligent, better versed in national and international affairs, and is much more compassionate, than Donald J. Trump!

    Oy!
    I just can’t……………

  2. Tom_b  •  Mar 18, 2017 @11:37 pm

    So, the guy who doesn’t really like NATO, who doesn’t fully comprehend what NATO does, who probably can’t SPELL NATO continues to bitch about how other countries aren’t paying their share? The same guy who proposes to axe two other key peacekeeping organizations, the US Department of State and the United Nations? Not to mention foreign aide.

    It seems daily I must explain to my teenaged children how an unstable, blithering idiot can become POTUS without any of our much-touted checks and balances actually working. I mean, the Electoral College could have drafted Romney, who is also dense and steeped in Republican voodoo economics, but, at least, is probably not mentally ill and has been known to speak in complete sentences.

    And as for American cars– yes, if they were good, people would buy them. But it doesn’t matter a rat’s butt, because plenty of BMW’s, Hondas, and Toyotas are made or assembled in the US. US jobs. Global economy, you know. And, no, no one is going to let you slap a 35% tariff on the new car they want. They’ll get them in gray market or something, with that much incentive.

  3. Swami  •  Mar 19, 2017 @12:22 am

    The meeting between the so-called president and German Chancellor Angela Merkel seemed a bit prickly to me, although of course I wasn’t there.

    You didn’t have to be there to know it was a disaster. Trumps body language and facial expressions were screaming for all the world to see that he is an obstinate and arrogant big bag of shit. His narcissism and bullheaded stupidity was radiating .

  4. Billikin  •  Mar 19, 2017 @1:17 am

    To remedy our trade imbalances we need a “weaker” dollar. Exchange rates float these days, so we can’t just devalue. IIUC, one reason the dollar is so strong is that a strong dollar gives us more clout to maintain the American Empire. Another is that the dollar serves as an international reserve currency. Oil contracts are denominated in dollars, for instance. Also, loans by the IMF and World Bank are dollar loans. Nations that got burned by the IMF in the 1990s are hoarding US dollars to avoid having to borrow from the IMF.

    This is not something I know a lot about, but I do know that the strong dollar hurts exports, and that a weaker dollar would make it less profitable to move US jobs abroad. Nixon devalued the dollar, didn’t he? I don’t think that Trump can just do that, but surely something can be done.

  5. Bonnie  •  Mar 19, 2017 @4:39 pm

    If an etiquette book wishes to illustrate boorish behavior, using the clip of Merkel and Trump would do the job. What a truly awful person he is.

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



    About this blog

    About Maha
    Comment Policy

    Vintage Mahablog
    Email Me
















    eXTReMe Tracker













      Technorati Profile