Only in the Blogosphere

The Talking Dog interviews Erik Saar, who was an Arabic linguist at Guantanamo Bay. You want to read this.

Dave Neiwert comments on those nasty liberal bloggers. Steve G. reminds us to remember Vince Foster.

More: Via Ezra, the Rude Pundit on those nasty liberal bloggers:

Why is it that whenever right-wingers wanna criticize the “viciousness” of the left, more often than not, they use e-mails and blog comments instead of, say, the words of writers (bloggy and non-bloggy) and leaders? Like Lanny Davis in the Wall Street Journal‘s OpinionJournal, making some big and brave statement about “McCarthyism” on the left towards Shoeless Joe Lieberman as indicated by the well-considered and crafted comments on blogs and e-mail responses. The Lieberman-lovin’ Davis writes, “The far right does not have a monopoly on bigotry and hatred and sanctimony. Here are just a few examples (there are many, many more anyone with a search engine can find) of the type of thing the liberal blog sites have been posting about Joe Lieberman” and then quotes the mean meanies of the left, like at Daily Kos. But not, you know, Kos, or Hunter, or McJoan, or DarkSyde, or any of the other posters. Nope, it’s commenter “tomjones.” …

… When the Rude Pundit wants to go trawling for right-wing hate, he doesn’t need to look to his hate e-mails, with their occasional threats of violence. He doesn’t need to point to the comments on right-wing blogs. He can just point to the blogs themselves, or turn on the goddamn radio or the fuckin’ Fox “News,” or open the newspaper to read the vomitous rantings of every other conservative columnist talking about liberals despising and destroying America. They can only pick nits; we have to swat hissing cockroaches.


More more:

Billmon’s Da Man:

This is really quite revealing of the neocon mind set — and the increasingly large gulf between that mind set and what American power and influence can support:

    “The position that we’re taking in the UN is just nuts,” a former White House official close to the US decision-making process said during the negotiations. “The US wants to put international forces on the ground in the middle of the conflict, before there’s a ceasefire. The reasoning at the White House is that the international force could weigh on the side of the Israelis — could enforce Hezbollah’s disarmament” . . .

    A former US Central Intelligence Agency officer confirmed this view: “I am under the impression that George Bush and Condoleezza Rice were surprised when the Europeans disagreed with the US position — they were running around saying, ‘But how can you disagree, don’t you understand? Hezbollah is a terrorist organization.'” (emphasis added)

And a tough and dangerous one to boot. This is supposed to encourage the French to plunk their people down in the middle of a hot LZ?

Ever since 9/11, there’s been this attitude among the Bushies that the most important thing is to convince the world that America’s enemies (who are now identical with Israel’s enemies) represent the ultimate in evil — the Wal-Mart of evil, the Pittsburgh Steelers of evil, the Dr. Evil of evil. Once that goal has been accomplished, why then of course the “free world” will line up and enlist in Uncle Sam’s army. Or so the thinking seems to be.

In other words, the PR strategy is also the diplomatic strategy — and, as we’ve seen in Iraq, the military strategy as well. Mike Gerson (Bush’s chief speechwriter, crafter of all those fine phrases about freedom and democracy) really is running the war. And when you let your speechwriters run your war, you have no right to complain when you lose.

6 thoughts on “Only in the Blogosphere

  1. Nicely put together articles. To complete the circle, all the speech writers do is accept the nonsense spewed by the right wing hate mongers as truth and reflective of public opinion, and the insular circle of delusion is complete. I hope I am not being too harsh on Dumbya and his administration, its just that apart from wanting no part of their ideology, I think they are moronic incompetents. But I mean that in a sincere and non hateful way.

  2. I hope I am not being too harsh on Dumbya and his administration

    It is not possible to be too harsh on Dumbya and his administration. I only regret that all harshness falls short of the terrible reality.

  3. If I wanted to prove some wing-nut point, and the only evidence I needed was a comment on some blog, if I couldn’t find one, I could plant one. But of course, the righties would never do something like that.

  4. And when you let your speechwriters run your war, you have no right to complain when you lose.

    Well said. Recall, for example, that arch-super-villain-state Iran was literally begging to help us after 9-11 with our little al Qaeda problem (Sunni AQ and its hard-ass Sunni Taliban allies were no friends to Shia Iran) and being on the border with Afghanistan… this was no idle offer. Instead, the White House famously rebuffed Iran, whose then figure head President was a “reformist” (rather than its current figure head lunatic) preferring instead to label it a member of the “Axis of Evil” for purposes of having a good tagline in a big speech, rather than getting some actual useful muscle on the ground where we could have used it.

    Just one of many typical moves… public relations first and foremost; public policy and actual results… somewhere behind, if at all.

Comments are closed.