Let’s Find the Joke

Is Rush Limbaugh about to have a Don Imus moment? Apparently Rush presented a little parody ditty called “Barack the Magic Negro”” on his radio show last month, and some of his own staff are fomenting mutiny over it.

The song ostensibly was inspired by this David Ehrenstein op ed in the Los Angeles Times, wherein the fabulous David E (who is African American) writes about how whites perceive Barack Obama. The Rush parody, unfortunately, has an entirely different point to it.

According to this site, in its most recent video incarnation the song (titled “U Da Real Negro Al, Screw Obama”) is performed by Paul Shanklin, a conservative political satirist, who tries to imitate the Rev. Mr. Sharpton’s voice. The video includes a slideshow of images of Sharpton and Barack pointing out the differences in their “blackness.” The song alleges that Barack Obama is not a “real” black man, which was not David Ehrenstein’s point at all.

The term “magic negro” (or “magical negro,” and other variations), refers to a stock character of (white) fiction — a benevolent African American who drops into the plot Deus ex machina-style to counsel and redeem the struggling white main character. Rita Kempley explained the “magic negro” in 2003:

Morgan Freeman plays God in “Bruce Almighty;” Laurence Fishburne a demigod in “The Matrix Reloaded,” and Queen Latifah a ghetto goddess in “Bringing Down the House. ”

What’s the deal with the holy roles?

Every one of the actors has to help a white guy find his soul or there won’t be a happy ending. Bruce (Jim Carrey) won’t get the girl. Neo (Keanu Reeves) won’t become the next Messiah. And klutzy guy Peter (Steve Martin) won’t get his groove on.

In movie circles, this figure is known as a “magic Negro,” a term that dates back to the late 1950s, around the time Sidney Poitier sacrifices himself to save Tony Curtis in “The Defiant Ones.” Spike Lee, who satirizes the stereotype in 2000’s “Bamboozled,” goes even further and denounces the stereotype as the “super-duper magical Negro.” …

… Historically, if a black person is thrust into a white universe, it is inevitable that the white people will become a better person,” says Thomas Cripps, author of “Making Movies Black: The Hollywood Message Movie from World War II to the Civil Rights Era” and other books on African American cinema. “Sidney Poitier spent his whole career in this position. Sidney actually carried the cross for Jesus in ‘The Greatest Story Ever Told.'”

See also “Stephen King’s Super-Duper Magical Negroes” by Nnedi Okorafor-Mbachu, written October 2004:

The archetype of the Magical Negro is an issue of race. It is the subordination of a minority figure masked as the empowerment of one. The Magical Negro has great power and wisdom, yet he or she only uses it to help the white main character; he or she is not threatening because he or she only seeks to help, never hurt. The white main character’s well-being comes before the Magical Negro’s because the main character is of more value, more importance.

I think it’s debatable whether presidential candidate Obama neatly falls into this stereotype. On the other hand, I do think there’s truth in the observation that white Americans are more, shall we say, comfortable with some African Americans than others; Colin Powell also comes to mind. This underscores the point that “race” is as much a social construct as anything else, but this is a huge topic I don’t have the energy to dive into right now. Some other time, maybe.

In his Los Angeles Times op ed, David Ehrenstein elaborates:

And what does the white man get out of the bargain? That’s a question asked by John Guare in “Six Degrees of Separation,” his brilliant retelling of the true saga of David Hampton — a young, personable gay con man who in the 1980s passed himself off as the son of none other than the real Sidney Poitier. Though he started small, using the ruse to get into Studio 54, Hampton discovered that countless gullible, well-heeled New Yorkers, vulnerable to the Magic Negro myth, were only too eager to believe in his baroque fantasy. (One of the few who wasn’t fooled was Andy Warhol, who was astonished his underlings believed Hampton’s whoppers. Clearly Warhol had no need for the accoutrement of interracial “goodwill.”)

But the same can’t be said of most white Americans, whose desire for a noble, healing Negro hasn’t faded. That’s where Obama comes in: as Poitier’s “real” fake son.

The senator’s famously stem-winding stump speeches have been drawing huge crowds to hear him talk of uniting rather than dividing. A praiseworthy goal. Consequently, even the mild criticisms thrown his way have been waved away, “magically.” He used to smoke, but now he doesn’t; he racked up a bunch of delinquent parking tickets, but he paid them all back with an apology. And hey, is looking good in a bathing suit a bad thing?

The only mud that momentarily stuck was criticism (white and black alike) concerning Obama’s alleged “inauthenticity,” as compared to such sterling examples of “genuine” blackness as Al Sharpton and Snoop Dogg. Speaking as an African American whose last name has led to his racial “credentials” being challenged — often several times a day — I know how pesky this sort of thing can be.

Obama’s fame right now has little to do with his political record or what he’s written in his two (count ’em) books, or even what he’s actually said in those stem-winders. It’s the way he’s said it that counts the most. It’s his manner, which, as presidential hopeful Sen. Joe Biden ham-fistedly reminded us, is “articulate.” His tone is always genial, his voice warm and unthreatening, and he hasn’t called his opponents names (despite being baited by the media).

Like a comic-book superhero, Obama is there to help, out of the sheer goodness of a heart we need not know or understand. For as with all Magic Negroes, the less real he seems, the more desirable he becomes. If he were real, white America couldn’t project all its fantasies of curative black benevolence on him.

This is too nuanced for righties, I realize, but you see that David isn’t writing about whether Barack Obama is inherently “black” enough, but rather about how he is perceived by whites. David says himself, “Speaking as an African American whose last name has led to his racial ‘credentials’ being challenged — often several times a day — I know how pesky this sort of thing can be.” His line about “Obama’s alleged ‘inauthenticity,’ as compared to such sterling examples of ‘genuine’ blackness as Al Sharpton and Snoop Dogg” was, as I read it, intended to ridicule people who make such comparisons. (Like Rush Limbaugh.)

When David’s column was published, a number of righties wallowed in feigned outrage over it. This blogger and his commenters oozed disgust at the racism of “White liberal elitists.” (I actually read through this muck; not one of them appears to have even a glimmer of what David’s op ed actually said.) “And is LIBERAL David Ehrenstein who coined ‘Magic Negro’ as a description for Barack Obama still writing for the L.A. Times?” writes this dimbulb.

I’ve been googling around trying to find the “lyrics” to the Rush parody song so that you don’t have to suffer through actually watching the putrid video. I had no luck, but Greg Sargent provides a description:

Let’s start with a particularly lovely Rush/Shanklin special. It has a voice parodying an Al Sharpton who is so illiterate that he spells the word “respect” like this: “r-e-s-p-e-c-k.” Here’s a transcript of the relevant bit, where the Sharpton stand-in is standing outside Barack Obama headquarters asking Obama for attention by singing the following lyrics to the tune of Aretha Franklin’s “Respect”:

    “R-E-S-P-E-C-K. Wha-choo mean it ain’t spelt that way? R-E-S-P-E-K-T? I need a dictionary!”

There’s more. As Media Matters reported the other day, Rush sang the ditty “Barack the Magic Negro” on his show on March 19, basing the lyrics on an L.A. Times Op-ed piece. But it gets better.

Now Rush is running a new, improved version of the “Magic Negro” song that’s way more fleshed out — and way, way, more eye-opening, too. It features a parody of Sharpton singing about “da hood” and saying that Obama is “ar-ti-coo-late.” Just give it a listen, it’s hard to describe how low it is.

There are also routines where the Sharpton stand-in insults Obama by saying “yo mama’s so fat” and so forth, as well as one where Sharpton demands that Obama explain himself to the “commooonity.”

The only racist slam Rush and Shanklin left out were watermelon jokes.

More Jokes:

Go see Bob Geiger’s Saturday cartoons. Read also about the senior Bush Administration official and former AIDS czar who resigned after his patronage of an “escort” service was uncovered.

Update: Garance has more:

There’s a big difference between a conservative Southern white man — in this case, Rush’s regular contributor Paul Shanklin, from Tennessee — doing these kinds of parodies of Al Sharpton and Barack Obama and, say, Kenan Thompson’s affectionate parodies on SNL. In addition to “Barack the Magic Negro,” Shanklin is also responsible for such tasteful Rush Limbaugh Show ditties as “Osama Obama.”

Lest you think such things are limited to brief moments on the radio, Shanklin’s “Magic Negro” song has already been turned into a YouTube clip which makes its highly offensive lyrics even more apparent. It’s like a slap in the face, nothing but pure racial insult against Obama, who is charged with being inauthetically black and pictured in a Klan robe.

12 thoughts on “Let’s Find the Joke

  1. Maha, I haven’t watched or listened to the video….don’t think I need to in order to make a comment: blustery white men like Rush probably are reminded [watching Barack] of their viagra-dependent inadequacies, then cover their jealousy/fascination with teen-level put-downs of a virile black guy [not to mention a black guy married to a beautiful six-foot tall accomplished woman].

  2. I wasn’t aware of the notion of the Magic Negro, although I saw “Six Degrees of Separation” and enjoyed it.

    My take on this is that Rush is doing his usual racist schtick, which has these additional components: he bashes a leading Democratic candidate, and he tries to regain ground lost to the racists in the Imus firing. And he does all of this, while hiding behind someone else’s writing (Ehrenstein’s). It’s almost like he’s saying “I dare ya” to make something out of this, and his base eats it up.

  3. What sad, sad people rush and his fans are.Not to mention those low life scum who would put their corporate logo on such trash by advertising , companies have sent a loud and clear message to me that they promote racism and the lowest form of thought our country has to offer..Their products will never be of use to me.I would not be able to use them without thinking of what and who they represent.The only product sold during rushs show should be a bedding store pawning white sheets…shoot right for the hard core base listeners needs!…
    I am sickened by the fact that there are still people out there like him who seek to inflame and encourage people to expand their lowest feelings of hate with regard to issues of race.
    I see racism as a wound. We are the collective body .What rush does is the equal of picking the scab off before the sore has healed intentionally to reinfect the wound…The wound cannot heal if we keep letting morons like him continue to pick off the scab.
    What a sad state of affairs it is when people applaud that.

  4. I am so clueless. I have been thinking of Barack Obama as an admirable man, a charismatic, worthy candidate for president. Now I find he’s only a negro. I claim the protections afforded by the fifth ammendment not to disclose my thoughts regarding Rush Limbaugh and his colleagues.

  5. 8) he might… I emailed Barnes and Noble and told them I would not be buying from anyone who advertises on radio shows that have racist “comedy” and they emailed me back that they had a policy of having every type of book including ones some people found offensive.

  6. Pingback: Brain Shavings

  7. I am well…I mean….are you for real? The song was about Jackson feeling upset that he was not considered, “the first articulate BLACK canidate” by the democrat party. Furthermore I have found more racism in this column and post’s than I even expected. Racism is seperation because of race. “PERIOD” I realize that some black people went through a tremendous struggle with slavery, but to act today like they were alone or even the most numerous in this struggle is ludicrous. White’s, latino’s, asians, and indians all shared in this dark time in the histrory of our country. We have all had our own stuggles in life and black people are in no way special or should they be treated thus. One of the first parts of this column caught my eye in that it stated that white’s are ok with some blacks ie; Colin Powel but still have a problem with skin color. I mean if that is not oxymoronic I am confounded. If white’s are ok with some black’s but not others wouldn’t that lead you to believe that it is in fact not skin color but something deeper that causes seperation in our country? Now, before you retort with something like “well, they (White’s) only like black people who act white.” remember that would be a racsist thing to say. Another item I would like answered is why is it necessary to have the title of African American? That title does not reflect skin color or country of origin, unless of course Charlize Theron is African American. Can’t we all be just Americans? When did that cease to be enough?

    Very interested in exchange, Jeremy

  8. If white’s are ok with some black’s but not others wouldn’t that lead you to believe that it is in fact not skin color but something deeper that causes seperation in our country?

    Race is a social construct, as is racism. That means it’s not really about physical differences, like skin color. It’s about social distinctions and inequalities created by ignorance and prejudice..

    Another item I would like answered is why is it necessary to have the title of African American?

    My understanding is that a lot of Americans with African ancestry prefer that to some other nomenclatures. I don’t see why anyone but the hopelessly anal would have a problem with it.

Comments are closed.