While most of us are wallowing in the latest twists and turns of the investigations of Trump, the Right is holding its breath waiting for anÂ Inspector General’s report on — you guessed it — Hillary Clinton.
The completion of a long-awaited watchdog report on the FBI and DOJâ€™s Hillary Clinton investigation during the 2016 presidential campaign has put Washington on edge, as the clock counts down to its potentially explosive release.
â€œWeâ€™re all anxiously awaiting this report,â€ Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, told Fox Newsâ€™ â€œHannity.â€
Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz announced the draft report was done in a letter to members of Congress on Wednesday. He did not say when the results of the review will be officially released to the FBI, DOJ and congressional committees.
We’ve had so many “final” reports on whatever it was the Clintons are being investigated for at the time, and they never amount to anything. It would almost be a relief if the IG report found the Clintons guilty of something; at least, it would shut up her die-hard supporters, who are a continuing drag on the Democratic Party, IMO.
However, it’s my understanding that the anticipated Inspector General’s report is about why the FBI screwed Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2016 but treated Donald Trump with kid gloves.
This month, the Justice Department inspector general is expected to release the findings of its lengthy review of the F.B.I.â€™s conduct in the Clinton case. The results are certain to renew debate over decisions by the F.B.I. director at the time, James B. Comey, to publicly chastise Mrs. Clinton in a news conference, and then announce theÂ reopening of the investigationÂ days before Election Day. Mrs. Clinton has said those actionsÂ buried her presidential hopes.
Those decisions stand in contrast to the F.B.I.â€™s handling of Crossfire Hurricane. Not only did agents in that case fall back to their typical policy of silence, but interviews with a dozen current and former government officials and a review of documents show that the F.B.I. was even more circumspect in that case than has been previously known. Many of the officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the investigation publicly.
We all remember the infamous New York Times story of October 31, 2016 declaring that the FBI did not see a connection between Russia and Trump. I suspected at the time that was a lie. But my post of October 31, 2016 was about the damn emails. With this graphic:
Conservative writer and novelist Roger Simon, who is not the Roger Simon who is a journalist, writes at PJ Media (another blast from the past) that “The Inspector General’s Report Will Expose the MSM as Treasonous.” His “premise,” if you can call it that, is that by focusing so much on Trump and leaks from Trump’s administration, while ignoring the evil machinations of the Clintons, the mainstream media is guilty of treason.
He even compares today’s treasonous media to the “good” media that exposed Watergate, because the Watergate reporters (according to Simon) didn’t need leaks. Seriously, he said that. He even ran an image from the film All the President’s Men, which he apparently didn’t watch. (Un, Deep Throat, folks? For that matter, Pentagon Papers?) In fact, it was Nixon’s obsession with leaks from his own administration that led to his ruin, this article says.
The IG report may be very, very bad for James Comey, a man about whom I am ragingly ambivalent. But other than that, I doubt the Right is going to be very happy with it.
Stuff to Read:
Jennifer Rubin,Â Trumpâ€™s team underestimates the extent of his exposure
Washington Post,Â The GOPâ€™s campaign against the FBI makes the nation less safe
Also, Trump Blinks; he’s caved to Kim Jong Un rather than risk his Nobel Prize.
Update: The Trumprettes weren’t just colluding with Russia. The New York Times is reporting that anÂ Â emissary from crown princes of Saudi Arabia and the UAE also met with Donald Trump Jr. in Trump Tower in August 2016 and offered to help Trump win the election.