The Many Republican Excuses for Gun Violence

Behold the bullshit:

Since Tuesday’s massacre of children, Cruz has spoken several times of his grand plan to keep schools safer — we need school buildings with only one door that can be guarded by armed security officers. Just the thing if there’s a fire or bomb threat and the building must be evacuated quickly.

But let’s look at the many excuses Republicans make for U.S. gun violence.

Excuse #1: The Shooter Was Evil

I douldn’t find a transcript, but you’ve probably seen the video of the news conference in which Greg Abbott went on and on about how the shooter was evil and the shooting was senseless. He did so in a manner that almost looked like a shrug, as if the presence of evil and the senselessness of the act rendered him helpless to prevent it. He was trying to exonerate himself from blame. Here’s something I wrote a few years ago after another evil, senseless mass shooting:

Of all the labels being attached to Paddock, “evil” is the most useless. Calling something or someone “evil” is an avoidance strategy, in my opinion. It’s a way of absolving oneself or one’s culture, society or nation of responsibility for something. IMO our proclivity for sorting humanity into “good buys” and “bad guys” bins — we are always one of the “good guys,” of course — is the cause of most of the atrocities of the world. I’ve written about this in the past. Very few of the atrocities of human history were carried out by people who were fully aware they were doing something evil.

Calling the shooter “evil” doesn’t exonerate anyone. Same thing with calling them “crazy.” It doesn’t solve any problems. It serves no purpose. It provides no solutions.

And the fact remains that the U.S. hardly has a patent on evil, yet we have somehow cornered the market on school shootings. It’s a uniquely U.S. problem.

Excuse #2: The Shooter Was Mentally Ill

Gov. Greg Abbott said Wednesday that the Uvalde school shooter had a “mental health challenge” and the state needed to “do a better job with mental health” — yet in April he slashed $211 million from the department that oversees mental health programs.

In addition, Texas ranked last out of all 50 states and the District of Columbia for overall access to mental health care, according to the 2021 State of Mental Health in America report.

Prediction: Abbott will make no move to replace that $211 million. In a few weeks people will quit asking about it. We really do need better health services for people with psychiatric illnesses in this country, but I’m not seeing a big rush to supply such services coming from Republicans.

The “mental health” excuse may or may not have a basis in fact, but even if there were a law that prevented people with a diagnosed “mental illness” from purchasing firearms, it would make little difference because very few perpetrators of gun violence have a diagnosed mental illness at the time they obtained the firearm, whether legally or illegally, and when they committed the violence. I’ve written about this before, too. A lot.

Most of the time, mass shooters don’t have a definable “mental illness.” They do tend to have a similar complex of common personality and behavioral characteristics, however. They tend to be hotheads. They tend to be impulsive. Often they are socially awkward in some way; women may call them “creepy.” They don’t tend to have successful relationships, in other words, although sometimes they are married. Very often they have histories of domestic violence and animal abuse. They probably hoard several firearms and have for a while.

Guys like this are as common as toast. What they don’t have is any kind of brain or medically defined psychiatric illness that accounts for their decisions to kill people. They are not psychotic; they are not hearing voices in their heads or imagining that the nice people in the church are really space invaders.

And there is no way for the psychiatrists to know whether this or that creepy hotheaded asshole is the one who might be a mass shooter, or not.  Further, there is no medical treatment for being a creepy hotheaded asshole.

When I say that most perps are not mentally ill I don’t mean that mental illness is never a factor. A couple of our famous mass shooters — James Holmes (Aurora) and Adam Lanza (Sandy Hook) could both have qualified as mentally ill at the time of the shootings, I believe, according to their medical records. But that’s two out of how many? There have been 27 school shootings in the U.S. just this year, and over two hundred mass shootings. Not to mention other firearm violence to be sorted into other categories. Even if you could stop every diagnosed schizophrenic in the U.S. from owning or carrying a firearm — and that wouldn’t be a bad idea —  it would probably make no measurable difference in the gun violence data.

One study found that only 11% of all mass murderers (including shooters) and only 8% of mass shooters had a serious mental illness.

Excuse #3: Laws Don’t Work

Let’s get one fact out of the way — states with loose and permissive gun laws have higher rates of firearm related homicides than those with stricter gun laws. So, it would seem, gun laws DO work in the real world.

Here’s Ken Paxton making the same old argument that more gun laws don’t work because “criminals” won’t follow them:

Basically, this argument is an admission of helpessness, that there is nothing that can be done about gun violence. Laws won’t work. It just is what it is.

A variation of the “laws don’t work” argument is the Chicago myth — that Chicago has strict gun laws and yet it’s a shooting gallery. Greg Abbott made that argument in his press conference. “I hate to say it, but there are more people who are shot every weekend in Chicago than there are in schools in Texas,” Abbott said, according to CNN. “So, you’re looking for a real solution, Chicago teaches that what you’re talking about [gun regulations] is not a real solution. Our job is to come up with real solutions that we can implement.”

Yeah, we’re all waiting for you to come up with those real solutions, governor. Haven’t seen any yet. But I’ve written about the Chicago myth before. Chicago doesn’t have exceptionally tough gun laws. It used to, but the Supreme Court nixed those laws in 2010. And there are several other cities with higher homicide rates, or the rate of homicides per 100,000 population. (I couldn’t find city data for shooting deaths specifically, just state data.) St. Louis is still #1. See also griping from the Chicago Tribune.

School shootings aside, there is a strong correlation between domestic violence and mass shootings outside of schools. A high percentage of such shootings are linked in some way to domestic violence, and there is reason to believe that keeping firearms out of the hands of people with a history of domestic violence would stop at least some mass shootings, not to mention save the lives of intimate partners. But even where such laws exist, they are badly enforced. And the NRA doesn’t like them.

See How the US fails to take away guns from domestic abusers: ‘These deaths are preventable’ at The Guardian. Here we have an example of one kind of criminal who really should be stopped from possessing firearms, and the law ‘n’ order crowd often can’t bring themselves to carry this out. So don’t waste our time whining about how laws don’t work.

School shooters are a slightly different crew. A study of U.S. school shooters found that all school shooters are male, with an average age of 18. Most of the time, these shooters intend the shooting to be a final act that they’ve been thinking about for a while; they are not acting impulsively out of rage. They post about mass shootings on social media. They are deeply unhappy, but not psychotic.

Inspired by past school shooters, some perpetrators are seeking fame and notoriety. However, most school shooters are motivated by a generalized anger. Their path to violence involves self-hate and despair turned outward at the world, and our research finds they often communicate their intent to do harm in advance as a final, desperate cry for help. The key to stopping these tragedies is for society to be alert to these warning signs and act on them immediately.

Making it easy and acceptable for these young people to seek help, to just bleeping talk to someone instead of holding it in, would probably help a lot also. I didn’t hear Gov. Abbott talk about that, though.

Excuse #4: We Need More Guns to Make People Safer

It’s a myth that more guns equal less crime, of course. There is all kinds of data showing that higher rates of gun ownership correlate to higher rates of gun death, including homicide. Putting more guns in the hands of “law-abiding citizens” absolutely does not make anybody safer, especially considering that many if not most mass shooters (including, I believe, the Uvalde shooter) were law-abiding citizens up to the moment they shot their first victim.

So making guns easier to purchase does drive up homicide rates, as we’ve been seeing in the U.S. in recent years. And “stand your ground” laws are linked to an 11 percent rise in firearm homicdes.

If you can think of any other excuses, please put them in the comments. I want to write another post about what needs to be done to reduce gun violence in the U.S.

Next: More Republican Excuses for Gun Violence.

The Do-Nothing Committee

11 thoughts on “The Many Republican Excuses for Gun Violence

  1. The one line that drives me to the very tipping point of insanity, is "The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun."

    We rational people all know how many lethal fuster-clucks that can result from that one.  So I'll spare you the list.

    2
  2. I note that the Klondike gold rush had an American side and a Canadian side.  The American side was lawless but the Canadian side was patrolled by the RCMP.  It was illegal to possess a gun on the Canadian side and the Mounties enforced it with the result being that the Canadian side was mostly peaceful.

    4
  3. Further, there is no medical treatment for being a creepy hotheaded asshole.

    What about a lobotomy? It might not address the creepy aspect of their mental condition but, in all probability it would solve or at least alleviate their hotheaded asshole issue.

    1
  4. Polling shows about 90% of Americans support universal background checks.  Polling shows 63% support banning assault weapons.  Polling shows 64% support banning extended ammunition clips.

    The 'excuses' listed are not excuses for U.S. gun violence;  they are excuses to do nothing about gun violence.  

    A 'bi-partisan' group of senators are supposedly working to agree on 'solutions' that are acceptable to 'both sides'.  That group of 9 includes Manchin, sEnema, and the usual group of republicans who like publicity (Graham, Collins) as 'moderates'.  After lots of talk and delay, they will probably come up with some 'solution' that will eventually not result in meaningful legislation and even then will likely get defeated.  If history is any guide, some of the republicans proposing the solution will vote against it.

    It is all about playing out the clock on the short attention span theater known as the corporately owned media.  Nothing will get done but killing time awaiting the next killing outrage then rinse, lather, repeat.

    2
  5. Republican (and some Democrat) House Representatives in rural and deep red districts who fear there re-elections will be jeopardized by taking a stance on real gun control solutions involving banning of military style weapons will not be cooperative in political changes at the federal level.

    The same can be said about the Senate. 

    So we will be subjected to the same mindless dross about "Thoughts and Prayers" and American tradition and culture of freedom, and the NRA will go into chicken little mode telling their followers in the rural and red and some democrat districts that "they" will be taking our guns away and there will be no way to stem the invasion of immigrants who are not storming our borders or to express their unhappiness with brown people who happen to cook their breakfast eggs incorrectly. 

    Result: The action taken in Congress will meet the political level commonly known as "jack shit".

    All we can do about it is strap ourselves in and wait for the next mass shooting that is considered newsworthy for the next 24 hour news cycle.

  6. President Uncle Joe will travel to Uvalde Sunday to share his capacity to feel sorrow. Then it is time to just STFU and move on to the next 'crisis'.

    President Uncle Joe and Chuck 'Wall Street' Schumer have already decided to move on. A group of 9 'moderate' senators (Manchin, sEnema, Ms. Lindsay, Susie Collins, etc.) are going to meet and 'find solutions' so Uncle Joe and Chuck will wait a few weeks or months before the 'moderates' arrive at a 'solution'. At best, that solution will be a toothless red-flag law and a bunch more money for police. As long as there is nothing more innocuous to the NRA than more money for cops and weapons, they may even pass some legislation.

    This group of 9 'moderates' has already taken universal background checks, eliminating assault weapons , and eliminating high capacity magazines 'off the table'.

    1
  7. Any excuse for insane behavior is just more insane behavior.  When one purchases a fetish weapon, they have already shown they are too crazy to own one.  By then they have probably entertained a number of fantasies in which they might use such a weapon.  Politicians who think otherwise are pandering to crazy and dangerous people and have not really critically listened to and watched their gun nuts constituents.  I have.  Rarely do I find an individual with a sane explanation about their gun purchases and ownership.  Most commonly I hear fetish tales and fantasy banter with only the thinnest of a rational veneer.  Almost never does one hear an admission that they might have a bit of a gun problem.  Most do. 

    1
  8. The "duty to retreat" component of legitimate self-defense was the rule in Early  America. (John Adams referenced it.) That was when human life was considered sacrosanct.

    Today there is no recognition that human life is sacred. We are taught not to respect the rights of others, including the right to live. "Other people" are merely targets when they get in the way of our sacred prerogative to go anywhere and do anything we please. "Other people" is code for blacks, hispanics and "foreigners". There are no good guys or bad guys, just "us" and "them".

    Much of this is a product of culture. We have been lied to since childhood. Westerns taught that killing is something not only understandable but laudable. The Westerns that took over popular culture bore no relation to how things actually were. We were supposed to admire John Wayne for his manly ways and willingness to dispense hot lead without anyone noting that Wayne sat out World War II while less "iconic" actors like Jimmy Stewart and Clark Gable actually stopped making movies and went to fight. Significantly, Stewart and Gable never talked publicly about their service – they just did it. But ask any gun-totin' nimrod who his hero is, and Stewart and Gable are never mentioned. Wayne's name still has totemic  power to this day.    

    We have never stopped fighting the Civil War. Hostilities were suspended during World War II, but since then we have retreated back to our corners. Half the country hates the other half. The multitude of Confederate battle flags flown at anti-government rallies are not symbolic: They are the essence of today's hate. Richard Thompson's words are apt: Guns are the tongues we use around here.

    6
  9. I think we're all missing something here. To understand my thesis, you might read up on the Wall Street Plot to overthrow the government under FDR when republicans fell out of favor in the Great Depression before WWII. The key point is this – the GOP and big business wanted to keep power when they could not win elections.

    Sound familiar?

    The demographics of this country are changing against the GOP. That's why AZ NV and GA are in play. They are holding back the tide for now with gerrymandering and voter suppression but every election cycle the backbone of the GOP decays. Old white guys are dying off.

    What's that got to do with school shootings. The weapon of choice for mass murderers is the AR-15. An 18-year-old with body armor and an AR has tactical superiority over any beat cop. Which is why they did not take him down for an hour.  Sane gun legislation would eliminate assault weapons (or limit them in public venues). Limiting the capacity of gun mags would give cops an advantage, or at least parity. 

    The J6 insurrection was organized by Trump and it was armed – there's evidence they had a significant arms cache in VA and were waiting to see the outcome before committing with military weapons. Members of the administration planned and coordinated the assault AND members of Congress gave aid assistance and tours of the Capitol Building to the insurrectionists in the days immediately prior.

    Getting the picture? The GOP and their corporate allies have zero loyalty to the will of the majority. When (not if) they can no longer win with the obstacles they are putting in place, they will refuse Democrats' power by force of arms (or the viable threat of force.) This was the plan with Smedley Butler, I've read. The crowd General Butler was to lead would be comprised largely of armed WWI veterans. FDR would remain as a figurehead and General Butler would direct Roosevelt as Butler was himself directed by the financiers of the coup.

    Am I being hysterical? When a former president posts an article calling for Civil War, it's time to take guns and militias seriously.

    Not long after the J6 insurrection, there was a rally in DC in support of the insurrectionists. I was there with a sign that said, "There Is No Right of Insurrection!" They think there is, implicitly, in the Declaration of Independence and the Second Amendment, authorization to use force against the government of the US. This is fed continually by puppeteers who would never risk participating -but they are calling for others to take that step.

    If the government bans assault weapons for sale and buys back AR-15s as soon as they are available… if you limit the size of mags to 5 rounds, if you implement background checks for every new and used weapon that changes hands, you are not violating the Second Amendment but you're making insurrection a suicide mission. 

    3

Comments are closed.