conservatism, News Media

What’s the difference between Faux Nooz and a prostitute? I’d say prostitutes are more honest.

Share Button


  1. Bob Karmazsin  •  Apr 14, 2009 @10:59 pm

    I’d say ANY prostitute is more ethical than Rupert Murdoch will ever be. :^)

  2. uncledad  •  Apr 15, 2009 @12:37 am

    And cleaner as well.

  3. Mike G  •  Apr 15, 2009 @12:48 am

    The great thing about the rise of cable TV is that provides indivdual channels for many interest groups. You have H&G for the home improvement crowd, Speed Channel for car enthusiasts, and of course Fox News for the retarded and mentally ill.

  4. biggerbox  •  Apr 15, 2009 @1:20 am

    And, compared to the cost of the Iraq War, a prostitute is cheaper, too.

  5. justme  •  Apr 15, 2009 @5:43 am

    At least you get your money’s worth with a prostitute

  6. c u n d gulag  •  Apr 15, 2009 @7:57 am

    You can’t blame Michelle Malkin for getting upset.
    She misread the report. Instead of “Special FOrces” she misread ‘Special FArces,” and thought they were referreing to her and her ilk.
    BTW – how do ilk travel? In ‘heards?.’
    Yeah, I know that sucked. I just woke up.

  7. joanr16  •  Apr 15, 2009 @8:45 am

    What’s the difference between Faux Nooz and a prostitute?

    Faux Nooz will take Rush Limbaugh’s credit card, but a prostitute insists on cash.

  8. Swami  •  Apr 15, 2009 @10:44 pm

    how do ilk travel? In ‘heards?

    I think it’s pretty good.