Kushner Money Blues

-->
Big Bill, Trump Maladministration

There’s a must-read report at Bloomberg News about the Kushner family finances. Executive summary: You think you have money problems? Boy howdy, you do not want to be them.

Here’s the story: Back in 2007, the Kushners bought a big ugly building on Fifth Avenue, Manhattan — 666 Fifth Avenue, in fact — that they couldn’t afford.

A kingmaker in New Jersey Democratic politics, Kushner had been out of prison just three months for making illegal campaign contributions and, in a bizarre episode that the tabloids couldn’t get enough of, hiring a prostitute to entrap his brother-in-law. He wanted a prestige Manhattan property to mark a fresh start for the family business, which would now be led, if mostly in appearance, by his eldest child, Jared Kushner, who frequently consulted his father. Charlie had recently been turned down for towers including the Seagram Building. He saw securing Tishman’s property as a way to plant his flag.

Over the weekend, the Kushners and their partners worked out a deal in which they would put down $50 million—a pittance. Barclays Bank Plc and UBS Group AG funded $1.75 billion of the purchase, $535 million of it in short-term, high-interest loans. The terms were demanding, bordering on untenable. Nevertheless, after the deal closed in January 2007, the group celebrated with a party at one of the most expensive restaurants in New York, Per Se. Everyone there was given a pair of silver cufflinks fashioned in the embossed look of the building’s exterior.

Note the date, 2007. Then came 2008. And the Kushners were stuck with this turkey.

At 1.5 million square feet, the 1950s building ranks nowhere near the largest of New York skyscrapers. Its low ceilings and closely built columns give it a dark, closed-off feel—anathema in the era of light-filled open-plan offices.

“If that building was beginning to look obsolete at the time of purchase, it is totally obsolete now,” says Jesse Keenan, a Harvard lecturer on architecture who wrote a 2013 report on the building for Kushner Cos. He notes that Manhattan is in the midst of its largest office-construction boom since the 1980s. The most prestigious occupants—hedge funds, private equity and law firms—are moving west to new buildings, shifting the center of gravity away from the Kushners.

Since the purchase there’s been some refinancing and some share selling, but the bottom line is that the Kushner company still holds half of a $1.2 billion mortgage, on which it hasn’t paid a cent, and the full amount is due in February 2019.  See, aren’t you glad you aren’t them?

And they’ve got this big turkey of a building that they probably couldn’t sell for that much. One guy they approached to help bail them out more or less said that the lot was worth more than the building.

Among other plans, the Kushners thought they might gut and renovate the building, turning it into luxury condominiums and high-end retail space. People who were asked to invest in this idea turned it down, saying that the potential return didn’t justify the cost. The New York luxury-retail market is already close to being saturated, apparently.

No American financiers would work with them, so the Kushners have been shopping abroad for someone to take some of the financial load off their hands. This was going nowhere, either, until Trump won the election. Suddenly, people would at least take meetings. The problem is that the thing is such an obvious money-loser that no honest investor wants to have anything to do with it. And those entities that might have other motives for dumping a ton of cash into a building owned by the president’s son-in-law have been frightened off by the scrutiny surrounding Kushner. Chinese and Saudi companies that nearly bought in earlier this year have backed out already.

On top of that, a lot of the Kushner family’s other projects aren’t doing much better, as CNN reported recently. Remember the time they got caught selling visas in China? That was to prop up another project, One Journal Square in Jersey City. Recently a Kushner family request for a 30-year tax abatement and $30 million in city-issued bonds to keep the project alive was turned down by Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop.

Fulop is a Democrat, and his political rival says the mayor didn’t support the tax break because of the political risk he faced for aligning himself with the Kushners in the past.

“This pivot away was clearly based upon Fulop’s identification of a shift in the political winds and recognition that Trump and Kushner are toxic in Jersey City,” said Bill Matsikoudis, a Democrat, who is running against Fulop in the city’s mayoral race.

I haven’t heard that the One Journal Square building project is now dead, but I suspect it is.

No one seems to be asking the obvious question — why isn’t the allegedly wealthy Trump family bailing out the Kushners? One suspects that the answer is that the Trumps are leveraged up to their eyeballs already. I trust Mr. Mueller will sort that out eventually.

The other part of this touches on Jared’s many meetings with people he shouldn’t have met with. Keep in mind that Kushner has kept 90 percent of his real estate holdings. How nervous is he getting, do you think?

Josh Marshall writes,

It was almost unquestionably this money hunt that led Kushner to meet with that chief of a Russian owned state bank during the transition – a source of many of his current troubles.

What all of this amounts to is that while Kushner has been given oversight of numerous key foreign policy issues and problems, his ‘family’ is simultaneously in a desperate hunt for money which basically has to come from abroad – from a lot of the people he meets with in his White House job. It’s like having a Secretary of State desperate for help getting money from every foreign potentate he meets with. In fact, it’s not ‘like’ that. It sort of is that.

This is, um, not good. All I’m going to say further, for now, is that we seriously need a Constitutional amendment that says presidents and their White House advisers must make complete tax returns public before general elections and also sell or place in a genuine blind trust all businesses and investments before taking office. But that’s not going to help us now.

Share Button
12 Comments

12 Comments

  1. Ed  •  Aug 31, 2017 @4:22 pm

    If I were in his shoes, I would embezzle the money from the government and get my father-in-law to pardon me.

  2. Swami  •  Aug 31, 2017 @5:09 pm

    During Charlie Kushner’s 14-month incarceration in an Alabama penitentiary, Jared flew down every Sunday. For years, he carried a wallet his dad had made him in the prison workshop.

    Aw, isn’t that sweet!

  3. Swami  •  Aug 31, 2017 @5:35 pm

    The appropriate scripture for Charlie and his penitentiary built wallet is: May the blessings of the Lord be upon us; and establish the work of our hands.
    I guess the government knows that idle hands are the devil’s workshop.

  4. bernie  •  Aug 31, 2017 @5:47 pm

    Wise sources have taught me that real estate operates on the biggest fool theory. Are we to believe that the son in law is the biggest fool? 

  5. Diane  •  Aug 31, 2017 @6:23 pm

    Why should Trump bail them out?
    It is a Trump family tradition to declare bankruptcy.
    If it’s good enough for the Trump family, gosh darn it, it’s good enough for the Kushners!

    I’m wondering if Trump will pardon Jared’s dad. That should make Chris Christie good and mad.
    Should be an interesting Fall.
    Because honestly, if the Kushner’s get into legal trouble in NJ, I can’t imagine Chris Christie pardoning any of them. Nor Eric Schniderman in NY. And it appears Mueller is covering all the bases and working with the states to make sure these people get EVERYTHING they deserve.

  6. Swami  •  Aug 31, 2017 @10:06 pm

    Just as a point of observation…The building is numbered 666. Not that we can draw any firm conclusions from that, but that is considered the mark of the beast. just sayin’

  7. uncledad  •  Aug 31, 2017 @11:02 pm

    “hiring a prostitute to entrap his brother-in-law”
    Any real reason to delve any further?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSl0w5Cqj-Y

  8. priscianus jr  •  Aug 31, 2017 @11:14 pm

    Bwaaaahahahahahaha

  9. LongHairedWeirdo  •  Aug 31, 2017 @11:29 pm

    What’s kind of messed up about this is, we shouldn’t *need* to make President’s tax returns public. We should be able to count on the Congress to maintain some level of oversight.

    They’re literally arguing that, if people use Trump’s hotels, and spend boatloads of money there, because doing so would help out the POTUS who might be able to do them a favor, it’s not an emolument – it’s just, you know, business. And it sure isn’t a BRIBE. Good lord, how DARE you insult the PRESIDENT in such a callow manner!

    What’s REALLY messed up: we know that the Republicans can spot problems with ethics and possible illegality. We know they hounded Clinton – using their official powers to harass her – for far, far, far, far, far, far, far less.

    But no one even so much as suggests there’s something surprising that Congress won’t do that because Republicans are in control.

    I mean, seriously, pause, think about that. “You don’t expect a political party to investigate something that might harm their interests do you? WHY? For ‘the good of the nation’ I suppose?!”

    Seriously: What would we say of another nation that let widespread corruption run without so much as a meaningful investigation, because the perps were members of the dominant party?

    (Of course, we know what we call a nation where the investigative powers of government are turned on particular targets for rank partisan purposes. AMERICA! No, wait… we call such a nation corrupt, and a fake democracy.)

  10. c u n d gulag  •  Sep 1, 2017 @12:36 am

    LOL!
    Yet another case of someone so rich, to avoid boredom, and to satiate at least some of the ever-increasing, relentless greed, s/he overreaches for more money – because, really, why the hell not?

    But, while overreaching, wraps her/his handos around their own throat, snd starts choking themselves.
    Let’s hope In this case, it’s to death.

    Btw, back in the mid-80’s, I ran a small satellite TV company for a psycho millionaire who was a commercial real estate VP at Cushman Wakefield.
    So, I’ve been in that 666 5th Ave shithole hundreds of times.
    And every time I was in there, I felt kind of strange.
    I couldn’t ever figure out why?
    Not then.
    Not for years.

    Well, when I first turned on ” Mad Men,” it hit me!
    Every time I entered 666 5th, I felt like a man out of my own time period – like I was in a rather lame “Twilight Zone” episode.
    I had to wear a suit and tie whenever I went there – at a time when that was just beginning to change.
    The characters in ” Mad Men” reminded me of my former boss and his richie-rich pals.

    So, while I finally figured out why 666 5th made me feel hinky, I could never tolerate another second of what everyone tells me was a great series.

  11. KC  •  Sep 1, 2017 @12:54 am

    The whole thing makes me ill. Add in the upcoming tax giveaways to the few and very rich, and it makes me feel even worse.

    The Legt has to stop bitching at itself over 2016. We gotta vote in 2018.

  12. grannyeagle  •  Sep 1, 2017 @7:43 pm

    Jared is Jewish so he’s not skeered of that 666. I really am grateful right now that I am not wealthy, it’s nice to be poor, just have my kids, my soulmate dog and love, love, love.
    I have a roof over my head, plenty to eat and nobody’s shooting at me. Life is good.



    About this blog

    About Maha
    Comment Policy

    Vintage Mahablog
    Email Me
















    eXTReMe Tracker













      Technorati Profile