There Is No Climategate

-->
environment, science, Wingnuts Being Wingnuts

As you know, when it comes to facts righties operate with the mother of all double standards. A rightie can pull completely fabricated “facts” out of his (and her) ass with impunity, but if anyone they don’t like is even a tad imprecise, the Right flames it into a scandal that never dies.

So it is with “Climategate.” As you probably have heard, a few days ago more than 3,000 private emails and other documents from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (CRU) were published on the Internet, allegedly by hackers. (I read an argument yesterday that CRU wasn’t necessarily hacked, but in any event emails that were meant to be private were made public.)

By misconstruing scientific colloquialisms — for example, the use of the word “trick” — and seizing upon peer-review type criticism of a few research papers, the Right has managed to misinterpret the emails into “proof” that global climate change is not just a mistaken idea, but a deliberate hoax — a conspiracy so immense it includes most of the world’s earth scientists, including 97 percent of climatologists. Amazing.

The reason this non-scandal will not go away anytime soon is revealed in a Wall Street Journal headline: “Cap and Trade Is Dead.” In other words, vested interests are involved. Vested interests trump truth every day of the week and twice on Tuesday.

A blogger at RealClimate grumbles,

More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our socialist/communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though.

At The Guardian, George Monbiot calls on scientists to stop waiting for the screeching righties to shut up and move on to the next non-issue. Monbiot has been on the front lines battling climate-change deniers and knows how crazy — and how obsessed — they are. But, he says, it is true that a few sloppily researched papers were published that should not have been published, a point that was the topic of many of the emails. The fact that this happened is genuinely damaging. The deniers have lied with impunity for years, Monbiot says, but that is all the more reason for science to be much more careful.

Of course, in Rightieworld Monbiot’s article was interpreted to be an admission that climate change might be a hoax. Never forget that these people have the reading comprehension level of turnips.

I know it can be exhausting to deal with righties; while you are correcting one lie, they’ve thought of ten more. There is no more point in “debating” issues with them than in explaining physics to an anthill. But I think it is important to get facts out for the public record, if only because the world is full of lazy hack journalists who don’t bother to check facts, either, unless you do it for them and then rub their noses in the facts so they notice.

I also think Monbiot is right in that care must be taken not to give whackjobs any molehills they can turn into a mountain. For example, one of the several reasons I stopped giving money to the National Abortion Rights Action League several years ago, in spite of my being adamantly pro-choice, is that sometime in the mid-1990s I observed NARAL spokespeople stupidly and unnecessarily handing ammunition to the troglodytes.

This was in the 1990s, when the fetus people seized upon so-called “partial birth” abortions (more accurately called a “D&X” procedure) as an issue to crusade against. NARAL released some figures on the number of such procedures done in the U.S. each year. Unfortunately, the NARAL numbers were only of third-trimester procedures, and the spokespeople didn’t make that clear. Since D&X was mostly performed in the second trimester, the actual number of D&X procedures in total was at least three times higher (the total was between 1,500 and 3,000, depending on who you asked, so it still was a small number). Further, NARAL spokespeople said the D&X was only performed when medically necessary, which was true of third trimester procedures but not always of second-trimester procedures.

I realize the NARAL people probably were taken in by the Right’s incessant yapping about “late-term abortion” and conflation of “late-term abortion” and “partial birth abortion” to be the same thing. To most sane people, a second-trimester abortion is not late term. Still, there is no excuse for being sloppy when presenting data.

Not surprisingly, the abortion criminializers seized upon this discrepancy, and for several months after the opinion section of nearly every newspaper in America was given over to denouncements of the lies of NARAL. And it became an article of faith among “pundits” that pro-rights activists were just as likely to lie as anti-rights activists, never mind that the criminalizers couldn’t string together two truthful statements in a row if they tried. Not that they ever try. From “rapes don’t cause pregnancies” to “abortions cause breast cancer” (they don’t, btw) it would take encyclopedias to catalog all of the misinformation that has come out of the Right on abortion. But NARAL trips up just once, and we never hear the end of it.

So it is with “climategate”; we’ll never hear the end of it. Unfortunately, this will likely slow our response — already too slow — to global climate change.

Update: Talk about a tool — this guy goes on and on about the glory of truth and the wonders of science, then sides with the liars. Amazing. But to really plum the depths of this guy’s critical thinking skills, check this out:

The concept of honor comes from the base of truth and is why it is so prominent in the military and also explains why the vast majority of people in the military come from Judeo/Christian backgrounds.

Yes, in nations in which the vast majority of people are either Christian or Jewish to one degree or another, it’s a safe bet that most people in the military come from Judeo-Christian backgrounds. Hysterical. And the idea that the concept of “honor” is unique to the Abrahamic religions reveals a grotesque ignorance of other religions and cultures. (See, for example, the Code of Bushido).

The phony climategate non-scandal does reveal a divide, but it’s not so much a cultural divide as a social-psychological divide. But we’ve had this discussion before, so I’ll stop now.

Update: The Economist has a good backgrounder on the “Climategate” mess.

Share
10 Comments

10 Comments

  1. Scorched Earth  •  Nov 28, 2009 @1:48 pm

    You know, all these knee jerk liberal tree huggers are bad for business. We really SHOULD just eliminate the EPA and all those annoying environmental regulations. Corporate America KNOWS what’s best for America and will protect the environment. Oh, and coal burns SO cleanly these days – here’s a REAL fun way of mining it.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountaintop_removal_mining

  2. moonbat  •  Nov 28, 2009 @3:16 pm

    I’ve steered clear of this phony “controversy” (why trouble the finite brain cells with infinite permutations of stupidity), but it is interesting that this erupts on the eve of the Copenhagen conference. Then again, Al Gore’s new book Our Choice: A Plan to Solve the Climate Crisis also just came out. BTW, great interview of Gore and his book on Charlie Rose (key in “Al Gore” in the search box on the right, and the interview will come up. Click it to get it to stream).

  3. c u n d gulag  •  Nov 28, 2009 @3:48 pm

    They’re against all abortion. And what ‘mester’ it is doesn’t matter, Mrs. and Mr.
    And as for climate change – what climate change, the righties argue? It still gets cold every fourth trimester.
    Maybe they’ll admit there’s climate change when Todd’s ‘snow-machine’ bogs down in the Alaska mud in February and Sarah Palin has to shoot and dress her moose in between the palm trees.

  4. Charles  •  Nov 28, 2009 @4:56 pm

    Unfortunately, human nature being what it is, there are going to be some dishonest and some sloppy researchers on the AGW bandwagon. That’s just a fact. Among the nearly unanimous mass of climate scientists (not the mixture of meteorologists, scientists whose expertise is either in something far removed from climate, or who retired twenty years ago that the deniers will bring up at every chance) who find the AGW theory explains the current warming, some will be in it for the money, and who can possibly be surprised? Anyone with a minimal sense of proportion sees this as nothing but a few people, either taken out of context, incautious or misunderstood in their wording, and the occasional truly bad paper, which following papers will correct.

    But then those on the right have no sense of proportion (or, I would argue, any other kind of sense, but I digress), and their eager facilitators in the press, for whom a fight is an opportunity, will flog this horse until they drown in the rising waters or starve because of the crop failures.

  5. Bonnie  •  Nov 28, 2009 @7:40 pm

    Just for the record for the EPA haters, the EPA was created by the very Republican Richard Nixon administration.

  6. moonbat  •  Nov 28, 2009 @8:18 pm

    The concept of honor comes from the base of truth and is why it is so prominent in the military and also explains why the vast majority of people in the military come from Judeo/Christian backgrounds.

    Apart from being oblivious to the notion that the common military background might just mirror the common background of the population at large, there’s the lovely, unstated assumption that the Judeo/Christian understanding of reality is the only one that’s True. The only thing missing is “My God is bigger than yours, nyah-nyah-nyah-nyah”. This guy’s writing just sounds so totally circular, half-asleep, confusing cause and effect, and unaware that he’s living in a box.

    Because climate change isn’t in the Bible, it can’t be true.

  7. peter vernon  •  Nov 28, 2009 @8:37 pm

    Burning fossil fuel is wrong in many ways: finite supply, escalating cost, most of it must be imported from very bad countries, the pollution it causes kills and sickens tens of thousand yearly, it poisons the environment, it will cause the ice caps to melt and flood our coast where the majority of us live.

  8. Sam Simple  •  Nov 28, 2009 @11:33 pm

    How sad that CO2 levels are going to build and catastrophic climate change will accelerate, thanks to misreading, misreporting and misinterpretation of a few e-mails. People are so stupid.

    Speaking of stupid, a true story about how the absolutism of the anti-abortion crowd hurts women: In the mid-1990s, after the hubbub over “partial birth abortion” a woman was informed that the baby (27 weeks along) she was carrying was dead; no heartbeat. When she asked her doctor what she should do, she was told, she could wait for the dead fetus to spontaneously abort, which could take days or weeks, or try to find a doctor who would perform a dilation and extraction (D&X). However, due to the publicity around “partial birth abortion” and threats of violence from the far right – no doctor in her area would perform one. As a result, she was forced to carry a dead fetus for 10 days then labor for 8 hours, only to deliver a still-born child. That is the sort of horror the right-wing has created, with their insistence that “all abortion is murder”. And this story is not unique…

  9. Doug Hughes  •  Nov 29, 2009 @12:10 am

    The tobacco industry blew smoke up our ass (figuratively) for decades after they knew the health risks. But they delayed every step of the way, killed God knows how many smokers, and made huge profits. The oil & coal industries know what the truth is, but they don’t want to make changes that will interrupt the money machine. The tactics are the same as tobacco – they want to drag out progress for decades, and THEN claim that they lead the charge to reform. Hell has a special section reserved for Wall Street CEOs, fueled one woould hope with coal and oil..

  10. Steven Lewis  •  Nov 29, 2009 @2:42 pm

    [Concern troll. Comment deleted. See comment policy.]



    About this blog



    About Maha
    Comment Policy

    Vintage Mahablog
    Email Me


















    Support This Site





    site design and daughterly goodness

    eXTReMe Tracker












      Technorati Profile