Pay to Play?

Trump Maladministration

The simplest explanation for the recent Michael Cohen revelations is that Cohen was merely cashing in on his relationship to Donald Trump any way he could.

Trump’s unexpected win left corporations scrambling for someone who could give them insight into how the new administration would operate, and anyone with real or perceived access to Trump had plenty of opportunities to cash in.

“Everyone was hiring ‘Trump whisperers’ in 2017 — every single hanger-on in the Trump orbit made a fortune in 2017,” one Republican consultant told Politico. “And not necessarily to influence them, just to try to figure out who are the right people to talk to.”

“The question was ‘Who is the real influence?’” the consultant said. “Is it Gary Cohn? Steve Bannon? Wilbur Ross? How do we get to Jared and Ivanka? Does anyone know Dina Powell? Does anyone listen to Steven Mnuchin? There’s no point talking to Reince Priebus, right? Every single client we had was trying to figure it out.”

Cohen portrayed himself as the one person who could answer these questions. One GOP strategist described his pitch to CNN: “I don’t know who’s been representing you, but you should fire them all. I’m the guy you should hire. I’m closest to the president. I’m his personal lawyer.”

However, we don’t know where all the money went. And until we do …

Greg Sargent has a taxonomy of possibilities for what went on with Cohen’s “Essential Consultants” shell company.

  1. Trump didn’t know about “Essential Consultants” and received no benefits from it, except for the payment to Stormy Daniels, which he reimbursed.
  2. Trump didn’t know about “Essential Consultants” but benefited from it quite a bit. Cohen might have used it to pay off a lot of other people on Trumps behalf, for example.
  3. Trump knew about “Essential Consultants” and knew he was benefiting from it.
  4. Trump knew about “Essential Consultants’ and received money directly from it.

Cohen could get into deep trouble under all of these scenarios, but Trump probably wouldn’t for possibilities #1 or #2. And even under #3 and #4 he might not get into trouble unless someone can show there was a direct quid pro quo discussed with these payments.

Consider that none of the companies that paid Cohen can offer explanations for what they paid him for that aren’t downright laughable. As Amy Sorkin points out, Essential Consultants looks a whole lot like a Trump slush fund.

Cohen, in this scenario, was just doing the paperwork and providing a vehicle for payments. If there is anything else the companies that paid him were getting, they need to offer better explanations. To put the matter most bluntly, if Cohen was Trump’s bagman, was Essential Consultants anything more than the bag?

This returns to the basic who-is-paying-whom question. Trump, at one point, said that he did not know where the money that Cohen used to pay Clifford came from. Perhaps he just let other people take care of the getting-it-back-to-Michael part; using other people’s money is a prime Trump business directive. But, again, Cohen took care of Trump’s problems—Trump’s expenses. That’s what he was being paid back for, and that is the transaction that the companies that paid him risk being drawn into.

Consider that Trump may have actually baited some companies into giving money to Cohen:

What is important to keep in mind here is that when Trump came into office the pharmaceutical companies were terrified and flying blind as to what would happen under President Trump. There was actually an out of the blue statement Trump made in the second week of January 2017 about cracking down on the Big Phrma that had the big companies terrified. He told a press conference on January 11th that the pharmaceutical companies were “getting away with murder.” He had repeatedly talked about reining in drug prices on the campaign trail. But in January he seemed to be upping the ante dramatically. It even crosses my mind, in retrospect, whether this comment wasn’t intended to scare companies into Cohen’s arms.

So they sign up Cohen, based it seems simply on being a friend of the President. Then they meet with Cohen, decide he can’t deliver and have no more communication with him. Notwithstanding this, they decide to pay him the entire $1.2 million. “As the contract unfortunately could only be terminated for cause, payments continued to be made until the contract expired by its own terms in February 2018.”

The story is that Novartis had its first and only meeting with Cohen early in 2017, and at that meeting they realized he was an empty suit who was cashing in. They had no more dealings with him, yet they continued to pay him. Was that because they were afraid if they didn’t pay him they’d piss off Trump?

Plus you’ve got payments from AT&T (which wanted approval for a controversial merger with Time Warner) and Korea Aerospace Industries (looking for defense contracts), etc. Cohen had nothing to offer them except access to Trump.

WaPo also reported today that a Russia-linked company that hired Michael Cohen registered alt-right websites during election.

Columbus Nova, a company whose U.S. chief executive, Andrew Intrater, and Russian investment partner Viktor Vekselberg have both reportedly been interviewed by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s team, is listed as the registrant behind a handful of domains for websites named after the alt-right that were created during the 2016 election.

It is unclear if any of these websites were launched or ever hosted content.

Scratch anything close to Trump, and there’s a Russian.

Share Button
12 Comments

12 Comments

  1. Doug  •  May 10, 2018 @3:00 pm

    These companies paid Cohen for doing nothing because there was a signed contract. How could Cohen have sued in open court without producing the contract? Any of those companies could have walked away at any time and didn't. Why?

  2. moonbat  •  May 10, 2018 @3:47 pm

    Good news from the left coast: California’s Republican voter ranks sink to almost even with Independents

    ..the percentage of registered Republicans in the state fell to a new low, with the number now almost equal in size to the voters unaffiliated with any political party.

    …While both major political parties lost ground from the last state registration report issued in January, Republicans are now inching perilously close to being the third largest bloc of California voters….

    The last time a GOP candidate won a statewide race in California was in 2006…

    This is one elephant I hope we can push into extinction out here…

  3. moonbat  •  May 10, 2018 @3:50 pm

    BTW, go see the movie Lady Bird. It was out a few months ago, and it has a couple good political jokes. The word “Republican” is used as an adjective, e.g. “Don’t be so Republican”.

  4. jrkrideau  •  May 10, 2018 @4:20 pm

    Would it not be unethical for a lawyer to be hired to lobby his client?

  5. maha  •  May 10, 2018 @4:30 pm

    jrkrideau — There’s nothing ethical going on here. None of it. The only question is, is it illegal?

  6. Swami  •  May 10, 2018 @4:28 pm

    (New York) —  America's mayor  Rudy Guiliani was admitted to New York Presbyterian Hospital early this morning. Emergency Services were called to the law office of Greenburg Traurig where Mr. Guiliani was found outside the door of his former law office covered in ten foot pole marks. His condition is not life threatening, but because of his age and deteriorating mental state he was transported to the hospital for observation. There are no witnesses to how this assault occurred. Mr Guiliani has no recall as to what happened.

  7. Eric Schmidt  •  May 10, 2018 @4:45 pm

    The country has been hypnotized.  

    Is there any other instance where it would be conceivable that a lawyer was arranging and paying for non disclosure agreements, ranging from $130,000 to a million, without his client's knowledge, or paying for the non disclosure agreements out of his own pocket?  

    It's ridiculous on its face.

  8. Swami  •  May 10, 2018 @11:08 pm
  9. uncledad  •  May 11, 2018 @9:06 am

    “Everyone was hiring ‘Trump whisperers’ in 2017 "

    It's really something that buying access government is legal and basically an accepted norm in this country, The United States of Corruption!

  10. elkern  •  May 11, 2018 @9:35 am

    Trump ALMOST deserves our thanks for exposing the corrupt process Corps use to control our government.  Yes, we all knew about Lobbying, but whoda thunk that they Corps would be so stupid as to give this creep millions of dollars for… "insight"!?

    I want to know about every dollar that Novartis, AT&T, etc, paid for "insight"/influence/etc.  Follow the money – to Congress – to win back control of OUR government.

  11. jrkrideau  •  May 11, 2018 @10:30 am

    @Swawi

    I loved the "every American in entitled to the presumption of innocence" just before he claims Cohen is a member of a corrupt cabal and things go downhill from there.

    Except for the sanctimonious patriotism, it was hilarious.

  12. Swami  •  May 12, 2018 @12:50 am

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/giuliani-says-cohen-never-spoke-225018879.html

    Looks like Cohen is being prodded into a roll over. It's like mamma used to say…When you're in trouble, you're in trouble alone! So much for loyality, huh Cohen?

     Cohen better start singing and hoping for a lenient deal because if and when Cohen gets to Attica, Chico is going to be parting Cohen's butt cheeks with less effort than it took Moses to part the Red Sea.