More More Junk Intelligence

This is an update to “Junk Intelligence” (and “More Junk Intelligence“), in which I revealed that the Right Blogosphere had mistaken an old document from the Federation of American Scientists for something generated by the Iraqi Intelligence Service: Juan Cole says I’m right. He also translates the mystery Arabic page.

What does the Arabic say?

    “The Institutions of the Apparatus of the Intelligence Service on the Internet:

    You will find enclosed information on the Apparatus that has been published on the internet. It has information on our organization, but it is clear that the information is relatively old. Otherwise, it does not do more than mention some correct and important matters . . .”

It then goes on to list the names of some agents. As an intelligence service, its main concern was with cover, apparently.

In other words, Iraqi intelligence notes the appearance of the document on the internet in 1997, and laments that it is very basic [‘does not do more than’] and then notes with some amusement how out of date it is (with the implication that Western intelligence on Iraq must be pretty bad). The “out of date” comment probably refers to the Western document’s preoccupation with WMD, which Iraqi Intelligence would have known was gone by then. It may also refer to personnel having been switched around. Note that the Iraqi comment does not endorse the internet document. It not only says it is “old” intelligence, which is very damning in intelligence work, but it also uses the word “some” when referring to what is accurate and important in it. “Some correct and important matters.” There will be those who read this as a blanket endorsement; it obviously is not.

Yeah, that’s a find, all right. Kind of makes the whole last three years worthwhile, all by itself.

Glenn Reynolds, who linked to the Investors Business Daily article that quoted the FAS document as proof of Saddam’s evil capabilities, has yet to print a retraction. He is, however, having a fine time making fun of a mistake made by the New York Times, for which the Times printed a correction.

As of this writing neither Lorie Byrd nor Cold Fury have issued corrections, either.

Being a rightie means never having to admit you’re wrong.

8 thoughts on “More More Junk Intelligence

  1. maha – they haven’t issued a retraction yet because they haven’t yet found anyone to translate the “mystery” Arabic page the way they want it translated.

  2. Pingback: Cold Fury

  3. Mebbe they could get MEMRI to translate…

    Anyway, cold hissy fit, as you can see by the trackback, has issued the most psychopathic non-mea culpa I’ve ever seen…

    What the hell is he yammering on about, anyway? Regardless, he must be really mortified, because he opened comments, meaning he wants some n00b to stumble in so Lord Admin may then alter the n00b’s comments in a self serving manner (read the comments disclaimer — this guy’s nasty, and as someone who posts half-naked men engaged in questionable activities, I do not use that word lightly).

  4. BTW, now the boy at Cold Fury has persuaded himself that he is right and is trying to goad me to come back to his blog and admit I’m wrong. This is beyond pathetic. I actually feel sorry for his delusional rightie ass …

  5. Pingback: Cold Fury » Don’t Hold Your Breath watch, day two

  6. Pingback: The Mahablog » The Persistence of Stupid

  7. Pingback: car in loan title wisconsin

Comments are closed.