Tiananmen Remix

The Australian news organization ABC reports:

Reports from Burma say at least three monks and a civilian have been killed by security forces in a crackdown on anti-government protests.

A source from inside the military says two monks were beaten to death, while another was shot as he tried to wrestle a gun away from a soldier.

Soldiers have released tear gas in various parts of the city of Rangoon and a western diplomat says up to 300 people have been arrested, including about 100 monks.

The soldiers’ actions against the monks have angered many people, because monks are revered in Burma and have remained peaceful throughout the past five weeks of action against the military government.

Buddhist monks have been leading peaceful street marches for the past nine days in the biggest pro-democracy demonstration since 1988.

The military junta used force to put down that uprising, killing about 3,000 people.

I wrote about the recent protests in Burma/Myanmar a couple of days ago, and mentioned President Bush was going to speak about Myanmar when he addressed the UN yesterday. This has resulted in mostly isn’t it nice that he mentioned Myanmar stories in the U.S. press. But Pepe Escobar writes for Asia Times:

The mystery of why US President George W Bush took center stage at the United Nations General Assembly in New York on Tuesday but did not promote the next neo-con war on Iran was solved when it became evident that the job has fallen to his new European poodle, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who in his speech once again assumed the inevitability of an Iranian nuclear bomb.

Bush instead announced new economic sanctions against the junta in Myanmar and urged the world to apply “diplomatic leverage to help the Burmese people regain their freedom”. Here is Bush engaging in another “liberation from tyranny and violence”, this time in Asia, while trying to start yet another war, as usual, in the Middle East.

The connection is clear: the Bush conception of “human rights” means “oil and gas”. Bush also claimed at the UN that Lebanon, Afghanistan and Iraq had “asked for our help”. Given the precedents, even the isolated people in Myanmar should be afraid, very afraid.

Myanmar has been in effect off the radar of the international community for years. Why this new, sudden, Bush administration interest in regime change in Myanmar? If the US and the West are so obsessed with “human rights”, why not put pressure on the ghastly practices of the House of Saud? Or the barely disguised repression under the glitz in Persian Gulf petromonarchies? Or the bloody Islam Karimov dictatorship in Uzbekistan?

A vast drug-money-laundering operation, plus full Asian cooperation – to the tune of billions of dollars – helped the Myanmar junta to build its new capital, Naypyidaw, in the middle of the jungle, almost 350 kilometers north of Yangon, in essence using slave labor. The 10-country Association of Southeast Asian Nations, of which Myanmar is a member, has been very lenient, to say the least, with the unsavory generals, in the name of a policy of “non-interference”. Thailand – for complex historical reasons – would rather co-exist with a weak neighbor. India coddles the generals to get natural-gas deals – like a recent agreement to invest US$150 million in gas exploitation in the west of the country.

Enter the dragon

But Myanmar is above all a key strategic pawn for China. Not only as a captive market for civilian goods in addition to weapons, but as a pawn to keep India in check and assure China of key strategic access to the Indian Ocean. Just like Britain – which twice invaded Burma, as Myanmar was known until 1989 – China’s utmost interest is natural resources. Oil and gas, of course, but also gems and timber: the once-pristine forests at the Myanmar-China border have been practically wiped out. According to the rights group Global Witness, Myanmar exported no less than $350 million in timber to China in 2005 alone, and the bulk of it was illegal.

I apologize for doing so much pasting, but this is a complex issue that I’m learning about myself. There’s more in the article about connections between the Myanmar miitary junta and China, including a 2,380-kilometer oil-and-gas pipeline from Myanmar into China. Escobar continues,

US sanctions are just for internal American consumption; they will have absolutely no impact. For starters, Myanmar is not under a military embargo. A really different story, for instance, would be the Bush administration telling the Chinese to drop the junta, otherwise no US athletes will be seen at the Beijing Summer Olympics next year. London bookies wouldn’t even start a bet on it. The French for their part now say they fear a terrible crackdown – but in fact they fear what happens to substantial oil business by French energy giant Total. The European Union should have a unified position, but for the moment that is hazier than sunrise at the sublime Shwedagon Pagoda in the heart of Yangon.

This year China vetoed a UN Security Council resolution condemning the junta’s human-rights record. It’s virtually impossible that the collective leadership in Beijing will let one of its neighbors, a key pawn in the 21st-century energy wars, be swamped by non-violent Buddhists and pro-democracy students – as this would constitute a daring precedent for the aspirations of Tibetans, the Uighurs in Xinjiang and, most of all, Falungong militants all over China, the embryo of a true rainbow-revolution push defying the monopoly of the Chinese Communist Party.

So this seems to be the trillion-yuan question: Will Chinese President Hu Jintao sanction a Tiananmen remix – with Buddhist subtitles – less than one year before the Olympics that will signal to the whole world the renewed power and glory of the Middle Kingdom? If only the Buddha would contemplate direct intervention.

Just think of it — if the U.S. and other western democracies put China on notice to put a leash on the Myanmar junta or face a boycotted Olympics, think of the good it would do for hundreds of thousands of people in Asia. And at no loss of blood and treasure.

Well, I can dream. Maybe some other nations would consider it.

Sue Pleming of Reuters reports that the White House is “very troubled” today.

The United States said on Wednesday it was “very troubled” by the harsh crackdown against protesters in Myanmar and pressed China to use its influence to get the military junta to change its repressive policies.

The Bush administration was responding to word from hospital and monastery sources that two monks and a civilian had been killed, as Myanmar security forces tried to quell the biggest protests in 20 years.

“If these stories are accurate, the U.S. is very troubled that the regime would treat the Burmese people this way,” White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said as President George W. Bush pressed his foreign policy agenda in New York on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly.

I’m sure the Myanmar military is “very worried.” Oh, and the UN Security Council is meeting today to consider action against the junta. They might decide to send an envoy. Yeah, that’ll fix it.

History can be a prickly thing. Back in the1990s Hallliburton CEO Richard Cheney grumbled because Congress got in the way of business deals with places like Myanmar.

He cited Iran, which is making overtures toward renewed trade with the West, Myanmar (formerly Burma), and Nigeria as oil-rich regions that have come under fire in Congress because of their internal politics and accusations of wrongdoing.

Some are suggesting boycotts of countries that fail to protect religious liberties, he said.

“I don’t agree with that approach,” Cheney said.

There’s no profit in that approach, you see. It’s better to start a war; then Halliburton can get the contracts.

Jawahara Saidullah writes of the monks,

There are thousands of them but they are unarmed. Their saffron and maroon robes, their heads shaved, they march down the streets of Yangon. With dignity and non-violence, exhorting people to stay away for they don’t want others to face the wrath of the army. They are Buddha’s warriors.

They converge at the two pagodas: Shwedagon and Sule though they have been closed. With no weapons except their will and the belief in a cause that is just, these are the monks of Burma.

This really is a Tiananmen remix.

13 thoughts on “Tiananmen Remix

  1. For the Monks and the People:

    With a wish to free all beings
    I shall always go for refuge
    To the Buddha, Dharma and Sangha,
    Until I reach full enlightenment.

    Enthused by wisdom and compassion,
    Today in the Buddha’s presence
    I generate the Mind for Full Awakening
    For the benefit of all sentient beings

    As long as space remains,
    As long as sentient beings remain,
    Until then, may I too remain
    And dispel the miseries of the World.

  2. [Maha, I resent e-mail just now…..took awhile to re-read earlier post and get your on-line reply]

    Meanwhile, our total dead in Iraq just went over 3,800.

    There is something wonderful about those monks. I have great admiration for them.

  3. http://www.serbia-info.com/news/2001-02/16/22419.html
    My dear Maha, this problem will be with us for the rest of our lives. There will be blood for oil, diamonds ,arms,and opiates well into the future because that’s where the big money is. Burma has two out of three( and we could arm both sides, as usual). The sad thing is that it won’t matter which(of the two) party has the “conn”.It’s good cop/bad cop, anf there’s a lot of “folks” to control or kill. We have entered the era of the “new great game”, the big players being China and the U.S.. Russia is a major oil producer. China and the U.S. are trying to get the other oil producers under their “umbrella”.
    My guess is that Venezuela, Bolivia, Sudan, Burma, and Iran will go to China. The U.S. will have the Saudis and the rest of OPEC (and Colombia) UNTIL the dollar gets into a major freefall ( which may happen soon).I have read that Israel has demanded payment (loans, grants, etc.) from the U.S. in Euros.The U.K. is poised to go into the Faulklands once again.
    The War on Terror ain’t nothing compared to what may come.
    We gave China everything and now we’re going to set limits?
    Hell, that’s like me telling my wife she’s cut off! Give me a break……..
    We need leaders that want to do the right things, not drones beholding to foreign or corporate interests.

  4. Is there a media presence there? Because if there is no way to get pictures and facts out, I fear the sacrifice will be for nothing. The tactic is sound; they have the discipline, but the situation needs the spotlight of global publicity.

  5. A week or two ago, I read somewhere that Laura came back from some trip all concerned about this situation, and passed her concern on to the Decider. Looks like he decided to get involved, maybe for her sake.

  6. Maha,
    Any one of these monk’s has shown more courage than the most, if not all, of the Democrat’s.

    BTW – did you watch any of the debate? They can’t promise we’ll get out by 2113!!! WTF?!?
    Wow, what courage. What fortitude. What forsight.
    What a bunch of gutless pandering clowns…

    Dennis Kucinich, keep talking. Some of us are starting to listen.

  7. I think you’re a little off with your analogy, Maha…

    Sending the goon-squad into the pagodas and dragging out monks and followers is more of a replay of Saigon in ’64…

    And we all know how well that turned out…

  8. “They might decide to send an envoy. Yeah, that’ll fix it..”

    You scoff but wait until they issue the strongly worded joint statement. That will bring the Burmese junta to its knees.

    Frank Burns: I warned them. I warned them not to do this.

    Colonel Flagg: Why didn’t you order them?

    Burns: Well uh ,a warning can be like an order. I mean if you warn hard enough.

  9. Pingback: Mike the Mad Biologist

    (who’s there???)
    (“boota?” boota who?)

    I’m glad to see Escobar’s article here. His remarks about the Buddha, though, treat him like any other externalized salvific figure. BTW, you can substitute any such figure in the joke and it works just as well at forming a more perfect union of seeker and sought.

  11. treat him like any other externalized salvific figure.

    I don’t hold that against Escobar. It’s rare for someone who hasn’t entered the stream to perceive Thusness.

  12. Pingback: Mike the Mad Biologist | Mirror | rorriM

Comments are closed.