Wisconsin Senate Republicans Screw Unions

I’m just learning that the Wisconsin Senate just passed a bill to strip pubic employees of collective bargaining rights. They did this by separating the union busting provision from the larger budget bill and making it a separate law. Apparently under Senate rules they didn’t need the quorum to pass it.

However, a Dem Wisconsin senator-in-exile is saying the maneuver violates Wisconsin “open meetings” laws that requires a certain amount of prior notice to such a vote. The senators-in-exile might go back to Wisconsin now, but their first priority is to explore legal remedies for overturning tonight’s Senate vote.

Meanwhile, Lee Fang at Think Progress says that state Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald admitted on Fox News that the whole point of the rights-stripping is to cripple the unions and make it easier for Republicans to get elected in Wisconsin.

FITZGERALD: Well if they flip the state senate, which is obviously their goal with eight recalls going on right now, they can take control of the labor unions. If we win this battle, and the money is not there under the auspices of the unions, certainly what you’re going to find is President Obama is going to have a much difficult, much more difficult time getting elected and winning the state of Wisconsin.

Update: See TPM for details.

Update: Howard Fineman on MSNBC say that today’s maneuver was ordered by the national leaders of the Republican Party in hopes that the students and union members in Madison (a college town) will hit the streets and overreact. They want violent demonstrations they can show to people nationwide so they can paint President Obama and Democrats generally as some kind of 1960s radicals.

High-Tech Kristallnacht

By now you’ve heard that NPR President and CEO Vivian Schiller resigned at the request of NPR’s board of directors because an outgoing NPR executive was caught on video expressing personal opinions that angered the teabaggers.

As Sean Paul Kelley said, “There is absolutely zero political courage in DC.” John Cole adds, “This approach of bending over and taking it every time you upset the wingnuts is proving to be really successful.”

This episode also proves that the teabaggers believe they have an absolute right to punish anyone who says anything they don’t like. They also believe they have an absolute right to destroy any institution they don’t like, by any means, honest or dishonest, including means outside the law or political processes. A propaganda campaign already destroy ACORN, and now they’re going after Planned Parenthood and NPR.

Remember when Clarence Thomas whined about a “high-tech lynching?” What Odious Toad [and accused hamster rapist] O’Keefe and the teabaggers are doing now amounts to a high-tech kristallnacht.

It’s especially galling that NPR is punished because somebody who believed he was speaking privately expressed commonly held and demonstrably accurate opinions. Yes, the exec also bit his tongue and did not refute outrageous statements being made by the disguised provocateurs, but at the time he was being offered $5 million for NPR.

As Jack Shafer said, “If you’ve ever hung out with rich people, you know they have a lot of crazy ideas and aren’t afraid of expressing them. … we’d last about 15 seconds in the fundraising business if every time a potential donor said something crazy or offensive, we told them to shut their pie hole.”

Getting back to what former NPR exec Ron Schiller said about the GOP being eaten by evangelicalism, check out Dana Milbank. The current model “centrist” among the presidential candidates, Tim Pawlenty, is channeling the ghost of Jerry Falwell.

At the Faith & Freedom event, he [Pawlenty] was dropping g’s all over the place, using “ain’t” instead of “isn’t,” and adding a syrup to his vowels not indigenous to Minnesota. He didn’t utter the word “jobs,” made only passing reference to economic woes, and instead gave the assembled religious conservatives a fiery speech about God, gays and gynecology.

“We have people in Washington, D.C., who believe the unborn do not have a right to life,” he roared. “Yes, they do! We have people in Washington, D.C., who say marriage will be defined however we feel like defining it. No, it won’t!” His central theme: “We need to be a country that turns toward God, not a country that turns away from God.”

Get this —

The Tea Party is morphing from an economic movement into a conventional moral crusade.

That pivot was best articulated by Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) in his speech at the Faith & Freedom event. “It’s not the economy,” he told the crowd, warning about gay marriage. “If we get the culture right, the economy will be right eventually,” he said to applause.

A similar message was offered by Rick Santorum, another presidential hopeful. “Everyone wants to talk about the economy, and it’s important,” he said. “But what’s the mission? What’s the what-for?” Santorum’s what-for was abortion. “Any child born prematurely, according to the president, in his own words, can be killed,” Santorum alleged.

The group’s chairman, Ralph Reed (formerly of the Christian Coalition), told the crowd that if the government violated the people’s God-given rights, “it was our duty and moral obligation to replace that government, by force if necessary.” Even aspiring candidates Newt Gingrich and Buddy Roemer, who between them have had six wives, spoke about moral values.

Yep, Ralph Reed is still with us. After Reed’s sleazy association with Jack Abramoff a sane audience would howl him off the stage for uttering words about “moral obligation.” And the fact that Newt Gingrich can stand in front of an audience and shamelessly talk about moral values is proof he has no moral compass whatsoever. A normal person who had lived Newt’s life would be ashamed enough to shut his pie hole.

Good Read

A Blueprint for a Takeover: Wisconsin Republicans Lied While the Kochs Schemed” at The Awl.

Update: The video below is a townhall meeting in Wauwatosa, WI, a community of about 46,000 people a few miles northwest of Milwaukee. The politicians are a U.S. congressman from Wisconsin, Rep. James Sensenbrenner, a Republican, and state Sen. Leah Vukmir, a Republican.

Whatever they’re selling, people ain’t buying it.

Think Progress explains that people were protesting Sensenbrenner’s endorsement of the GOP House budget proposals. Think Progress also points out that in 2009 Sensenbrenner was telling Democrats they should listen to the teabaggers being bussed around to disrupt Democratic town hall meetings.

The crowd’s greater wrath seems to be aimed at Sen. Vukmir, however.

If the Teabag Fits …

Here’s what Wingnut World is up in arms about today

A man who appears to be a National Public Radio senior executive, Ron Schiller, has been captured on camera savaging conservatives and the Tea Party movement.

“The current Republican Party, particularly the Tea Party, is fanatically involved in people’s personal lives and very fundamental Christian – I wouldn’t even call it Christian. It’s this weird evangelical kind of move,” declared Schiller, the head of NPR’s nonprofit foundation, who last week announced his departure for the Aspen Institute.

I had just read a piece at Salon by Steve Kornacki about how the Republican Party has morphed into a branch of evangelical fundamentalism. Kornacki compares a Republican presidential candidate forum held in Iowa recently with videos of similar functions held in Iowa 20 years ago. Of the recent event, Kornacki said,

The five candidates who did show up — Tim Pawlenty, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, Buddy Roemer, and Herman Cain — peppered their speeches with references to God and morality, denouncing abortion and gay marriage (and, of course, disparaging President Obama). As the Los Angeles Times put it, “the candidates essentially pledged the same thing, with a few variations in language and emphasis.” By now, we’re more than accustomed to national Republican politicians making these kinds of appeals to these kinds of audiences.

If you compare that with Republican presidential candidate rhetoric of just two decades ago, leading up to the 1988 elections, the difference is pronounced. And at that point, as most of us remember, the Christian Right already was a big factor in politics. But it hadn’t completely consumed the GOP. Back then, it still was possible for a major Republication politician to make campaign speeches and talk about stuff other than God, morality, abortion, etc.

As John Cole wrote, everything Ron Schiller said “should be met with a resounding -‘No shit.'”

Naturally, Ron Schiller was captured on a James O’Keefe video —

In a new video released Tuesday morning by conservative filmmaker James O’Keefe, Schiller and Betsy Liley, NPR’s director of institutional giving, are seen meeting with two men who, unbeknownst to the NPR executives, are posing as members of a Muslim Brotherhood front group. The men, who identified themselves as Ibrahim Kasaam and Amir Malik from the fictitious Muslim Education Action Center (MEAC) Trust, met with Schiller and Liley at Café Milano, a well-known Georgetown restaurant, and explained their desire to give up to $5 million to NPR because, “the Zionist coverage is quite substantial elsewhere.”

— which makes me suspect Schiller isn’t exactly the brightest bulb in the lamp store. I’m sure the video was subjected to O’Keefe’s famously creative editing, but this has “entrapment” written all over it. But then, the teabaggers are upset over this —

On the tapes, Schiller wastes little time before attacking conservatives. The Republican Party, Schiller says, has been “hijacked by this group.” The man posing as Malik finishes the sentence by adding, “the radical, racist, Islamaphobic, Tea Party people.” Schiller agrees and intensifies the criticism, saying that the Tea Party people aren’t “just Islamaphobic, but really xenophobic, I mean basically they are, they believe in sort of white, middle-America gun-toting. I mean, it’s scary. They’re seriously racist, racist people.”

All together now — ‘No shit.’ See also (and I still can’t believe I’m saying this) Charles Johnson.

And — Peter King, anyone? Steve Benen says the GOP is divided over Rep. King’s over-the-top-Islamophobic witch-hunt hearings, adding, “Just as aside, we now have House Republicans targeting abortion rights, access to health care, Muslim Americans, and domestic priorities, but the elusive GOP plan to create jobs is still nowhere to be seen.”

Bill-O Tells a Fib

I just came across a column by Bill O’Reilly in which the Big Giant Head says,

Here’s a lesson that is both ironic and sad at the same time. According to the U.S. Department of Education, two-thirds of the eight graders in Wisconsin cannot read proficiently. But assuming the kids are skilled enough to watch TV, they can now see their teachers demonstrating to keep their generous union benefits. So, while things do not seem to be going well in the classroom, any thought of holding teachers somewhat responsible is cause for a protest march.

Bill-O provides no link to wherever the Department of Education said such a thing. Since I just did a post about education statistics last week, however, I knew where to look for Department of Education statistics. And according to the Department of Education’s National Center for Education Statistics, the average reading score on the National Assessment of Educational Progress for Wisconsin eighth grade students is comfortably above the national average.

So either kids in other states are mostly illiterate, or Bill-O told a fib.

Through another page I learned that the average reading scale score for eighth graders nationwide was 262 (out of what I do not know), and the Wisconsin average was 266, Wisconsin’s eight-graders ranked 21st among the states. Massachusetts was first at 274, and last among the states was Mississippi, at 251.

I did some keyword searches on the Department of Education site and found nothing that said two-thirds of Wisconsin eighth graders don’t read proficiently.

Bill-O attributes his own superior education to St. Brigid’s School on Long Island, where there were 60 students and one nun in the classroom. “The nun brooked no nonsense,” he said. “She forced us to learn.” However, she forgot to teach him it’s not nice to pull data out of his ass.

Not So Fast …

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Wisconsin Senate Democrats are about to end their exile and come home. However, it appears Mr. Murdoch was indulging in wishful thinking. The senators told a Milwaukee NBC affiliate that the report was “more fiction than fact.”

Elsewhere — Throughout this episode, conservatives have said the Wisconsin senators are trying to overturn the last election by obstructing the judgment of the Senate majority. Ezra Klein makes the point that the senators are “filibustering with their feet.” Their delaying tactics have given the voters of Wisconsin an opportunity to learn more about the union-busting “budget” bill, and polls show they don’t like it much. Further, Ezra says, “The Democrats have shown the voters exactly what it is that they voted for in Walker.” Heh.

And what’s in Walker’s budget? Amanda Terkel writes that some of Walker’s “savings” come from de-funding Planned Parenthood and other family planning programs. The bill even repeals a state law that requires commercial health insurers in the state to cover birth control pills. Exactly what does that have to do with balancing Wisconsin’s budget?

Further, someone might point out to Walker that contraceptives are a lot cheaper than paying for pregnancy, childbirth, and infant care. The state’s health department said in 2008 that “expanding family planning services prevented an estimated 11,064 unplanned pregnancies and saved nearly $140 million in expenditures that would have been used to cover the births and health care costs of those children,” Terkel writes.

This is not a difficult thing to understand. Either Walker is extremely stupid, or he doesn’t really care about saving money as much as using the budget to impose his moral “values” on Wisconsin.

Equal Discrimination

John Blake of CNN asks if whites are racially oppressed. Blake doesn’t present evidence or anecdotes of white oppression, however. He presents evidence and anecdotes that many whites perceive themselves to be racially oppressed.

And if you read even closer, you see that many whites are offended at being defined as a race. Whites are, after all, the default norm; it’s those non-whites that are races.

The face of America is changing, says Wise, author of “White Like Me.” American culture has become so multicultural that many of the nation’s icons — including celebrities, sports heroes, and other leaders — are people of color.

“The very definition of being an American is going through a profound change,” Wise says. “We can no longer take it for granted that we (whites) are the dictionary definition of an American.”

This was my favorite part:

For many decades, white people saw themselves as individuals, not as members of a race, says Matt Wray, a sociologist at Temple University in Pennsylvania, who writes books about white studies.

“We are often offended if someone calls attention to our race as shaping how we view the world,” says Wray, author of “Not Quite White.” “We don’t like to be pigeon-holed that way. Non-white Americans are seldom afforded this luxury of seeing themselves as individuals, disconnected from any race.”

Of course nobody likes to be pigeon-holed that way, and of course racial identity shapes our experiences, which also shapes our worldview. There is no one more pigheaded than somebody who doesn’t see that.

But what it all boils down to is this:

Many white Americans have lived under the assumption that if they worked hard, they would be rewarded. Now more white Americans are sharing unemployment lines with “those people” — black and brown, Wise says.

“For the first time since the Great Depression, white Americans have been confronted with a level of economic insecurity that we’re not used to,” he says. “It’s not so new for black and brown folks, but for white folks, this is something we haven’t seen since the Depression.”

Melissa McEwan reminds us

The dispossession of poor whites is a legitimate class issue, which the GOP has endeavored to mendaciously reframe as a race issue, so that they might then summarily exploit white insecurity to support their classist agenda. This is the very crux of how the GOP has successfully convinced so many poor whites to vote against their own interests; exploiting this insecurity is the heart of the Southern Strategy.

I couldn’t explain it any more succinctly, except to add — yeah, karma’s a bitch.

One of the people in the article slipped up and identified white males as the genuinely oppressed group. I am old enough to remember when newspaper classified employment ads were grouped by race and gender, but for a long time after the ads stopped specifying “white men” the columns continued to be headed “Help Wanted Men” and “Help Wanted Women,” any any job that paid a living wage was listed under the “men” head.

And that didn’t stop until the early 1970s. Even then, for a long time if you called about a traditionally male-type job and had a woman’s voice, you were told the position was filled.

And this takes us to the next item, which is that the median real wage for men has dropped 28 percent since its peak in 1972, The article linked doesn’t say so, but I suspect the loss of union manufacturing jobs is the chief culprit. However, I remember reading years ago that downsizing companies often laid off more white collar men than white collar women, because they were paying women less for doing the same jobs.

This isn’t really news; lots of people have been saying that median real wages peaked in 1972 and have been dropping ever since. Of course, other people have been saying that real wages are merely stagnant, and other people — conservatives — swear up and down that wages have gone up, if only during Republican administrations.

I would really like to see the real wage reduction broken down by race and gender, but one suspects white men are taking the biggest hit, if only because they have farther to fall. Fifty years ago, any job that paid decently automatically went to a white man. You could even turn that around and say that traditionally “male” jobs paid better than “female” jobs because men were doing them. I don’t have a link, but I am willing to bet that fifty years ago, a female registered nurse with a bachelor’s degree made less than white male janitors working in the same hospital.

When I entered the workforce in the early 1970s, middle management was riddled with colossally incompetent men whose jobs mostly were done by their secretaries, who of course were women, and who of course were paid a tiny fraction of what their bosses were making. I saw this over and over. Women and minorities could pile up years of exemplary work and still be passed over for the good jobs.

I’m not saying all male managers were incompetent; I knew some who were excellent. And to be fair, I’ve worked for some women managers who were nightmares on steroids. But back then, white men were assumed to be competent and given one benefit of the doubt after another, and they were nearly immune from being fired.

(One clown I used to work for finally did lose his job when his incompetence led to an annual directory being printed, bound and shipped with entire pages of nothing but the letter Y. And no, it wasn’t sabotage. He made his deadline and stayed under budget by rushing the typesetting and eliminating the proofreading stage. The directory was the company’s single biggest money maker. But several hard-working, talented people — all women — left the company because of him before that happened.)

So what we’re seeing now is equal discrimination. There is, finally, a great evening out, but because the evening out is happening while the tide is going out, so to speak, we’re being rounded down instead of up.