Trump seems to be trying to intimidate the press. While thisÂ New York Post storyÂ appears mostly to have been generated by Matt Drudge’s fantasies, the Politico version of what happened when Trump met with 25 media executives yesterday — to discuss a “media reset” — was weirdÂ enough.
Trump turned to NBC News President Deborah Turness at one point, the source said, and told her the network wonâ€™t run a nice picture of him, instead choosing â€œthis picture of me,â€ as he made a face with a double chin. Turness replied that they had a â€œvery niceâ€ picture of him on their website at the moment. …
… Trump also singled out CNN, the source said, without elaborating on what the president-elect said about the network. A CNN spokeswoman wrote in an email that the network would not comment on an off-the-record meeting.
The Washington Post, which I understand was not represented at the meeting, was less kind.
But if the media elite attended in hopes of improving relations with the forthcoming Trump administration, that wasnâ€™t quite in the cards. The president-elect specifically called out reporting by CNN and NBC that he deemed unfair, according to four people who attended the meeting, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because the meeting was off the record.
Instead of striking a harmonious tone to build rapport following the election, Trump was combative, participants said. In a calm and deliberate voice, he told the group sitting around a conference table that they had failed to provide their viewers with fair and accurate coverage, and told them they failed to understand him or his appeal to millions of Americans.
But he made no mention of the enormous amount of airtime that the networks, especially on cable, devoted to his campaign. A number of analyses have noted that Trumpâ€™s presidential effort was boosted by the news mediaâ€™s fascination with him.
In a sign of another battle with the media to come, Trump also shrugged off the need for a constant press pool covering him, the people said, though he did not delve into specifics. Trump has repeatedly shirked his pool, upending a long-standing tradition of the president and president-elect.
WaPo currently is featuring an article saying that the Trump Foundation confessed to the IRS it had violated rules on “self dealing.”
But the New York Times had already published a story about how Trump and other billionaires are laying the groundwork for “an unprecedented legal assault on the media.”
Whatever Trumpâ€™s feelings about the media, New York Times v. Sullivan will surely survive his presidency. The case is revered, and in the last several years, the Supreme Court has moved to expand, not contract, the reach of the First Amendment. And states have taken steps, too: To prevent people from using the courts, and the discovery process, to silence or retaliate against their critics, 28 states and the District of Columbia have enacted anti-Slapp laws â€” the acronym stands for â€œstrategic lawsuit against public participation.â€ Itâ€™s possible, however, that Trump could appoint judges who would find a way around the usual press protections. More immediately, he could ask his Justice Department to prosecute journalists who report leaks from his administration. (President Obamaâ€™s Justice Department investigated reporters, but didnâ€™t charge them.) Itâ€™s also possible that the press will be a meeker watchdog because of subtler changes that are harder to track. As the head of the executive branch, the president exerts a great deal of control over access to information. Federal agencies have power to shape the state of the union; they also describe it for us by producing reams of facts and statistics, which in turn shape our assessment of our elected leaders. Trump could hire people who cancel funding for government reports or research that doesnâ€™t serve his interests, or who suppress findings the administration doesnâ€™t like.
The new president will be a man who constantly accuses the media of getting things wrong but routinely misrepresents and twists facts himself. â€œTheir single goal will be to burnish their reputation,â€ Tim Oâ€™Brien predicts of the Trump administration. There are signs, too, of new efforts to harness the law to the cause of cowing the press. Trumpâ€™s choice for chief adviser, Stephen Bannon, ran the alt-right Breitbart News Network before joining Trumpâ€™s campaign last summer. Breitbart announced last week that it was â€œpreparing a multimillion-dollar lawsuit against a major media companyâ€ for calling Breitbart a â€œâ€‰â€˜white nationalistâ€™ website.â€ Even if Breitbart is bluffing, the threat will discourage other news outlets from using that term to describe it, and that will in turn help Breitbart and Bannon seem more acceptable to the mainstream. Trump was right about one thing: You donâ€™t have to win every case to advance in the larger legal war.
Because of the proliferation of alternative news sources, the mainstream press doesn’t have the power to make or break a president as in the old days (think Lyndon Johnson, if you’re old enough to remember the news coverage he got). But they could surely pile a world of hurt on an administration if they were pissed off enough, and not cowed into compliance. We’ll see what happens.