Let’s see, where was I … oh, yes, politics. I wrote last week — “Iâ€™m saying Romney is George W. Bush without the Texas accent, people. You elect him, youâ€™ll get tax cuts for the rich up the wazoo, huge cuts in benefit programs, and a return to foreign policy by the Marlboro Man.”
Well, now we have a confession, at least on the domestic side of the agenda. Pat Garofalo writes for Media Matters —
During an interview last week on The Fernando Espuelas Show, Alexandra Franceschi, Specialty Media Press Secretary of the Republican National Committee, said that the Republican partyâ€™s economic platform in 2012 is going to be the same as it was during the Bush years, â€œjust updatedâ€:
ESPUELAS: What do you mean by economic security? Regardless of who the ultimate nominee is, whatâ€™s the general idea that the RNC, or the Republican party in general, has in terms of this message?
FRANCESCHI: Well, itâ€™s a message of being able to attain the American dream. Itâ€™s less government spending, which a Tarrance Group poll, came out last week actually, shows that the majority of Hispanics believe that less government spending is the way out of this deficit crisis. Itâ€™s lowering taxes so small businesses can grow and they can employ more people, because we understand that the private sector is the engine of the economy. Itâ€™s not the government. […]
ESPUELAS: Now, how different is that concept from what were the policies of the Bush administration? And the reason I ask that is because thereâ€™s some analysis now that is being published talking about the Bush years being the slowest period of job creation since those statistics were created. Is this a different program or is this that program just updated?
FRANCESCHI: I think itâ€™s that program, just updated.
Of course, the RNC has its fingers crossed voters won’t remember that Bush’s policies are what screwed the economy. Paul Krugman writes,
Just how stupid does Mitt Romney think we are? If youâ€™ve been following his campaign from the beginning, thatâ€™s a question you have probably asked many times.
But the question was raised with particular force last week, when Mr. Romney tried to make a closed drywall factory in Ohio a symbol of the Obama administrationâ€™s economic failure. It was a symbol, all right â€” but not in the way he intended.
First of all, many reporters quickly noted a point that Mr. Romney somehow failed to mention: George W. Bush, not Barack Obama, was president when the factory in question was closed. Does the Romney campaign expect Americans to blame President Obama for his predecessorâ€™s policy failure?
Yes, it does.
Of course, I suspect a lot of voters need reminding by this point.