How Bernie Sanders Already Won

I don’t know who the 2020 Democratic presidential nominee will be. I can’t even say who I’m going to vote for. But I do want to offer thanks to Sen. Bernie Sanders for accomplishing something remarkable.

Thanks in large part to the Senator’s 2016 presidential campaign, it’s now okay for Democrats to talk about what’s wrong with capitalism and what might be done to fix it.

For example, Paul Waldman writes that “In 2020, we may finally get to talk about what kind of capitalism we want.”

The upcoming presidential election is starting to look as though it will feature something extraordinary, even revolutionary: a genuine debate about whether American capitalism needs an overhaul. The only surprising thing may be that it took a decade after the worst financial crisis in 80 years for us to get deep into this discussion.

It isn’t just happening in the presidential race, but that’s also where this kind of debate can play out in the most high-profile, attention-grabbing way. With everyone thinking about 2020, a proposal such as the Green New Deal immediately gets tossed into the presidential campaign, with candidates forced to take positions on it and their own proposals compared with it. And though not all of the Democratic candidates were prepared to get down to the fundamental question of what sort of capitalism we ought to have, they may have no choice.

You can call it a result of the Democratic Party “moving left,” but that may be too simplistic a way to think about it. It’s also about a new refusal among liberals to accept that the system as it exists now is how it has to be.

I am remembering a moment in the 2016 primary campaign that annoyed the hell out of me. In one of the few Democratic primary debates, in October 2015, Sen. Sanders said,

And what democratic socialism is about is saying that it is immoral and wrong that the top one-tenth of 1 percent in this country own almost 90 percent — almost — own almost as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent. That it is wrong, today, in a rigged economy, that 57 percent of all new income is going to the top 1 percent.

That when you look around the world, you see every other major country providing health care to all people as a right, except the United States. You see every other major country saying to moms that, when you have a baby, we’re not gonna separate you from your newborn baby, because we are going to have — we are gonna have medical and family paid leave, like every other country on Earth.

Those are some of the principles that I believe in, and I think we should look to countries like Denmark, like Sweden and Norway, and learn from what they have accomplished for their working people.

To which Hillary Clinton responded,

But we are not Denmark. I love Denmark. We are the United States of America. And it’s our job to rein in the excesses of capitalism so that it doesn’t run amok and doesn’t cause the kind of inequities we’re seeing in our economic system.

But we would be making a grave mistake to turn our backs on what built the greatest middle class in the history of the world.

What built the greatest middle class in the history of the world was the New Deal, which “centrist” Democrats like Clinton had long ago abandoned in all but name. But worse, the “we are not Denmark” line smacks of American exceptionalism and the notion that everything we do is best and we have nothing to learn from those other, inferior countries, an attitude that is slowly strangling us. It prevents us from even dealing with problems that other nations have addressed successfully. It assumes the status quo is the only way things can possibly be and to think otherwise is just crazy. It’s why we can’t have nice things.

But this year, several of the candidates are more than ready to talk about big, bold programs that smack of Scandanavian socialism. I don’t believe any of the crew currently running would be so tone deaf to say “we are not Denmark.”

Liz Warren just trotted out a proposal for universal child care. Kamala Harris wants to reverse the Trump tax cuts, raising taxes on the rich and giving working- and middle-class tax cut akin to the Earned Income Tax Credit giving up to $500 a month to families. Cory Booker is promoting a “baby bond” program that would give every child a US Treasury bond at birth. Several  are willing to go beyond saving Obamacare and toward Medicare for All. Several candidates have expressed support for the Green New Deal. And, of course, Bernie is still running on the issues he’s been running on for many years. I’ve heard very few noises about being “pragmatic” and “incremental.” Thanks goodness.

(And I realize that a lot of Bernie fans are going to reject any candidate but Bernie. Booker and Harris in particular already are being vilified as “corporate whores.” I’m too old to be that picky. It will be okay, I say.)

Paul Waldman writes that Republicans frame all economic issues as if the only alternative to our present system is Venezuela, and any deviation from free market, cut-taxes-on-the-rich ideology is nothing but insanity. (See, for example, this Marc A. Thiessen column. Even better, skip to column and just read the comments.) But now even the “establishment” Democratic candidates are not afraid to say that a problem is a problem, even if the Right disagrees, and to propose something new and bold to fix it.

And I say credit for this new boldness goes to Bernie Sanders. Even though he came up short in primary votes in 2016, he showed the Democratic Party that a whole lot of voters were tired of being told what they can’t have and that their concerns are not important. And many Democratic politicians now have a clue that “safe” and “cautious” and “incremental” doesn’t win elections. Even if he doesn’t claim the nomination this time — and I suspect it will be even harder for him than it was in 2016 — in a sense, he’s already won.

So now all we have to do is take back all of Congress and the White House, and we can start turning the country around again. Let’s hope.

10 thoughts on “How Bernie Sanders Already Won

  1. We are not Clinton, anymore.  Suck on it Hillary.

    Sequeing in from the last post, I may have to give pats on the head to my conservative evangelical family members.  They seem to be starting to understand that unregulated capitalism leads to crony kleptocracy.  Maybe their children is making them be learning.

    • You're right.  I should love what the Clintons inspired.  Beijing has the best airport.  Dubai has the tallest building.  Europe makes the best planes.  China makes the best trains (and dams, infrastructure, networking technologies and cell phones…).  Japan makes the best automobiles and consumer electronics. India has the best software engineers.  And the Russian concept of oligarchy is spreading everywhere else.

      But Americans?  The Clintons helped make Trump, the greatest thing ever. 

  2. I mostly agree, but with the caveat that so far we're mostly talking about talking about capitalism.  

    When Americans understand sharing with easy clarity and that they can make choices about who shares and how much, we will be somewhere.

    Leaders need to help restore pride in the fact that tax dollars build the roads and feed the poor.  There is such a disconnect from the sense that tax money does good, its receded every year since WWII. 

    There is so much shaming associated with giving. We need to reiterate endlessly that the police, the army, the roads, the prisons, the museums are all public works, and make people feel connected and proud of that, not embarrassed that their money goes to scofflaws, as the skinflint narrative has gone on forever. (And able to demand that they are well run, because these things belong to us).

    From that standpoint, of pride in giving, we might finally ask about the rich pitching in.

    I think this can't happen on a fractured stage, and that it needs to be a slow softball, very wholesome, very sane.  Bernie did get this going, but whoever manages to get this on the dinner table is my heroine.


    • The day that Americans as a whole are appalled by Trump's remark about avoiding taxes "because I'm smart", is the day that this country will finally begin to get past its juvenile Me, me, me, me.

  3. Thank bernie for the idea that you can raise 6 million with average donation of 24 dollars.

    I was listening to NPR interview Chris Christie  and he said a room of 40 billionaires wanted him to run in 2012. That is our problem. 

    So many norms destroyed. We need  laws to enforce ethics. Trust but verify. We can no longer depend on the boys club honor system. Look at senate confirmation of rotten labor secretary. I'm a little encouraged at the reception Howard Schultz got. A little political maturity in America? 

  4. The thing about unregulated capitalism is that it fits with the current American ethos (especially among the Trumeteers): laziness. Regulation takes work, time, and constant attention, whereas capitalism just runs by itself as a distributed processing system. This feature makes it almost guaranteed to be corrupt.

    The last time unfettered capitalism was tried was mid-18th to early-20th centuries, and it ended in the Great Depression. You know why it was called the “Great Depression?” To distinguish that signal even from the once-a-generation vanilla depressions that were the normal economic outcomes of unregulated capitalism. Unfettered capitalism is a diverging oscillating system by nature, bound to end in catastrophic failure after the base capital has been extracted (mined) by those with means and motivation to do so.

  5. Hillary Clinton was merely channeling her inner Republican – recall that this was her party before she met Bill. So deep was the spell of Reagan that we fell for it.

  6. Saying "we're not Denmark" is on par with "Venezuala!"  Its a simple-minded formulation designed to play to the simple-minded, and does nothing to further any substantive discussion.  

    Hopefully this is a politics on both sides that is about to sunset.

  7. No disrespect to Bernie, but not taking corporate money isn't difficult in a state with a couple of thousand people and a Sasquatch searching for a mate.

    I'm very happy with all of the Democratic candidates so far (ok, maybe not Tulsi – and even she's not horrible).  And all the other ones rumoured to be thinking about it.

    And yes, maha, we liberals owe a debt of gratitude to the (non-religious) Apostle Bernie.  I don't think he'll be the nominee, but we should all be thankful for the crew he's inspired!

Comments are closed.