Deal or No Deal?

Trump has been back from China for several hours now, and as near as anyone can tell he came back empty-handed. He claimed he had made some trade deals, but so far these claims have been unconfirmed by China. Maybe the Chinese will be buying soybeans and Boeing jets, and maybe they won’t.

See Franklin Foer, Xi Jinping Was Only Humoring Trump. It begins,

Spare a moment, please, for the lame-duck superpower. It calls itself the leader of the free world, but the free world no longer believes it. When it extends its hand, nobody rushes to accept. When it threatens, nobody trembles.

Foer’s piece argues that Trump, the lame-duck president, is turning the U.S. into a lame-duck superpower.

After President Trump arrived in Beijing this week, Xi Jinping showered him with pomp befitting a summit of great powers. Yet the Chinese leader permitted potshots at his guest to go viral on his country’s internet rather than suppressing them, as some observers expected he would during a state visit. Xi answered Trump’s lavish praise by sternly lecturing him about meddling with Taiwan. In the end, Xi offered nothing of great substance—no solutions to the war in Iran, no sweeping trade deals, no promises of access to rare earth minerals. Xi used the visit to humor the lame-duck president, waiting for his time to pass.

Xi believe the U.S. is in a decline from which it will not recover.

During the first Trump administration, foreign leaders flattered and accommodated the president out of deference to American power. They feared it; they relied on it. During the second administration, and especially since the beginning of the Iran war, their calculus has quietly shifted—not because the strategy of obsequiousness has failed, but because it’s no longer worth the trouble. Like many of his counterparts around the world, Xi has begun to assume that it’s not just Trump who is term-limited; it’s also his nation.

Trump’s war in Iran was meant to showcase American power. It did the opposite. In the course of failing to remove a much weaker regime or eliminate its nuclear threat, the United States blew through its arsenal—so much so that allies in the Pacific reasonably wonder whether enough munitions remain to protect them. According to The Wall Street Journal, the Pentagon is now worried that it lacks the firepower to execute contingency plans for defending Taiwan.

Trump really is running the U.S. the way he ran his businesses. He was a terrible businessman also. But Trump’s biggest problem is that he can’t bully the whole world. Nobody is afraid of him any more. And Trump’s folly in Iran has shown the world our military limitations, which are becoming more limited by the hour. Both China and Iran, Foer says, are not interested in cutting deals; they are just waiting us out.  It’s a bleak assessment, but I can’t say he’s wrong.

Regarding Taiwan, do keep in mind that Taiwan has a near-monopoly on the production of the advanced semiconductor chips that are essential to pretty much all the technology you can think of. If this production capacity fell into China’s hands, this could create a situation worse than what’s going on in the strait of Hormuz.

Trump has complained that Taiwan “stole” the U.S. semiconductor industry, but that’s not true. What happened, as much as I understand it, is that beginning in the 1970s Taiwan invested considerable money and resources into developing ways to mass produce chips precisely and efficiently. They don’t design the chips themselves but produce chips for other companies. It’s less expensive for other companies around the world to have Taiwan make their chips than to make the chips themselves.  The Taiwanese didn’t “steal” anything. They did something very smart that paid off for them.

Several months ago Congress approved the sale of $14 billion in arms, including missiles, air-defense systems, and anti-drone equipment, to Taiwan. This has been waiting for Trump’s sign off. Now Trump is saying he’s withholding approval in order to use the arms sale as leverage to force China to make a deal. It doesn’t seem to be working. Chris Buckley in the New York Times:

Taiwan’s government has been waiting for months for Mr. Trump to sign off on a $14 billion package of missiles, anti-drone equipment and air-defense systems intended to fortify the island against Beijing’s military threats.

Mr. Trump himself had pressured Taiwan to spend more on its own defense. Now he is using the very arms his administration had pushed the island to buy as leverage with China, the United States’ main adversary.

Mr. Trump told reporters on Air Force One after leaving China on Friday that he had discussed the weapons package with China’s president, Xi Jinping, during their summit this past week in Beijing. He was asked in an interview with Fox News whether he would approve the Taiwan deal.

“No, I’m holding that in abeyance and it depends on China,” he said in the interview, which was recorded in Beijing but aired after he left. “It depends.”

“It’s a very good negotiating chip for us, frankly,” he said. “It’s a lot of weapons.”

He did not go into details about what he wanted in return, but Mr. Trump has pushed China to make major purchases of American airplanes, ethanol, soybeans, beef and sorghum.

It’s not working, dumbass. Just sign off on the sale. Assuming we still have the weapons to sell and haven’t burned them out in Iran already.

7 thoughts on “Deal or No Deal?

  1. I wish I could start a meme among his buttkissers to say that "among NK, the PRC, and Putin's Circle of Power, a 'donald' is a room-clearing fart that, even when it's obvious who laid it, no one claims responsibility because it was just that toxic. Better to fib "OMG, something crawled up *SOMEONE'S* butt and died!" than say "man, sorry folks, I'm human too."

    It's just… right for Trump isn't it? To watch his supporters sputter and scream, about literal FAKE NEWS? I'm not saying it's moral to perform this kind of deception, I'm merely stating there's justice if it occurred!!

    I'm sorry – I know my brain damage sometimes makes me juvenile, but, seriously, wouldn't there be some form of rough justice there?

    Still: I do hope it can at least merit a giggle from a brain damaged imagining of a cranky old man fearing that people think his name is attached to a wretched, unavoidable, stink.

    1
  2. "…a 'donald' is a room-clearing fart that, even when it's obvious who laid it, no one claims responsibility because it was just that toxic."

    Best description  of Pedonald I have heard in quite a while.

    1
  3. Paul Krugman admits he is not error free, and as such his credibility grows.  Others, following their leader never do.  Consequently, their credibility sinks and continues to do so in all but cult circles.  Some are so personally invested in the quazi/quasi deity they would need to totally reengineer their ego to separate from the cult.  Enough said there.  They are exceptions and true believers of the untrue. 

    Most of us know humans are imperfect, as are all human institutions.  A sure sign of a failing institution is one that publicly claims or shows infallibility.  Having a quazi-deity as a leader suffices as a sure sign of a failing institution.  Quazi seems the preferable spelling here as it has the accurate fascist aura.

    Krugman, in his podcast, stated that 40% of American companies are foreign owned.  He also stated what is good for Elon Musk is not always best for America.  

    Both statements merit remembering.  Both statements come free of cult bias.  Add also, national debt held by foreign interests.  Interest of 231 billion was paid in 2024 to foreign holders according to computer query.  Don't worry though.  Only citizens own all our liabilities. 

    2
  4. I am reading that the WH announced a 17B deal on ag products to China. Crickets from China. So is it true? Usually, these things are announced by both parties, like in China in front of cameras. It may be there is a deal. It may be that articles noting the lack of any deal caused Trump to cook up a complete lie under the assumption that China would not be so rude as to call Trump out. 

    Soybean farmers should not pop Champagne corks too soon.

    1

Comments are closed.