More about those pesky Russians —
Kremlin trolls burned across the Internet as Washington debated options (Washington Post)
After you’ve read that, check out this:
Kremlin Troll â€˜Alice Donovanâ€™ Reportedly Writing News As Recently As October (Talking Points Memo)
Regarding the word of Kremlin Troll Alicce Donovan, from the TPM article:
Perhaps predictably, some of the sites that published Donovanâ€™s work have reacted largely with shrugs in much the same way that right-wing organizations felt too much was made of pro-cop memes, anti-Hillary jokes, and anti-immigrant sentiment. The origin of the articles was unimportant, suggested both Veterans Today editor Gordon Duff and Counterpunch editors Jeffrey St. Clair and Joshua Frank. â€œI donâ€™t edit what people do. If itâ€™s original, Iâ€™ll publish it,â€ Duff told the Post. â€œI donâ€™t decide whatâ€™s real and not real.â€ Today Duff wrote his own conspiracy-filled piece about the Post story, primarily to criticize Counterpunch, at Veterans Today.
There are news sites and there are junk news sites; know the difference. IMO Counterpunch used to be better than it is now, though.
Counterpunch took a more philosophical tack: â€œSo why did we run five pieces by Alice Donovan?â€ asked St. Clair and Frank. â€œFirst, because they were interesting and timely. The short pieces on Syria, in particular, came at a moment when Trump was engaged in his first big military action and we were eager, perhaps too eager, to publish as many different perspectives as possible on his new, more aggressive policy.â€
Another site, We Are Change, didnâ€™t respond to the accusations at all, though it did remove Donovanâ€™s work from its public web presence.
See also, Russia Wants Americans to Doubt Mueller, Experts Warn (Newsweek)